Common physical properties of DNA affecting target site selection of sleeping beauty and other Tc1/mariner transposable elements.

Sleeping Beauty (SB) is the most active Tc1/mariner-type transposable element in vertebrates, and is therefore a valuable vector for transposon mutagenesis in vertebrate models and for human gene therapy. We have analyzed factors affecting target site selection of SB in mammalian cells, by generating transposition events from extrachromosomal plasmids to chromosomes. In contrast to the local hopping observed when transposition is induced from a chromosomal context, mapping of 138 unique SB insertions on human chromosomes showed a fairly random genomic distribution, and a 35% occurrence of transposition into genes. Inspection of the DNA flanking the sites of element integration revealed significant differences from random DNA in both primary sequence and physical properties. The consensus sequence of SB target sites was found to be a palindromic AT-repeat, ATATATAT, in which the central TA is the canonical target site. We found however, that target site selection is determined primarily on the level of DNA structure, and not by specific base-pair interactions. Computational analyses revealed that insertion sites tend to have a bendable structure and a palindromic pattern of potential hydrogen-bonding sites in the major groove of the DNA. These features appear conserved in the Tc1/mariner family of transposons and in other, distantly related elements that share a common catalytic domain of the transposase, and integrate fairly randomly. No similar target site preference was found for non-randomly integrating elements. Our results suggest common factors influencing target site selection of a wide range of transposable elements.

[1]  H. Varmus,et al.  DNA bending creates favored sites for retroviral integration: an explanation for preferred insertion sites in nucleosomes. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[2]  W. Reznikoff,et al.  Tn5 in Vitro Transposition* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  C. Hutchison,et al.  Insertion site specificity of the transposon Tn3. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  S. Devine,et al.  Integration of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1 is targeted to regions upstream of genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III. , 1996, Genes & development.

[5]  N. Craig,et al.  Target DNA structure plays a critical role in Tn7 transposition , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[6]  M. Sudoł,et al.  Mapping domains of retroviral integrase responsible for viral DNA specificity and target site selection by analysis of chimeras between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and visna virus integrases , 1995, Journal of virology.

[7]  E. Rassart,et al.  Association of a host DNA structure with retroviral integration sites in chromosomal DNA. , 1994, Virology.

[8]  N. Craig Target site selection in transposition. , 1997, Annual review of biochemistry.

[9]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  J. Boeke,et al.  Targeting of human retrotransposon integration is directed by the specificity of the L1 endonuclease for regions of unusual DNA structure. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[11]  N. Craig,et al.  Tn7 transposition: Target DNA recognition is mediated by multiple Tn7-encoded proteins in a purified in vitro system , 1993, Cell.

[12]  J. Lodge,et al.  Mutations that affect Tn5 insertion into pBR322: importance of local DNA supercoiling , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[14]  M. Junop,et al.  Factors responsible for target site selection in Tn10 transposition: a role for the DDE motif in target DNA capture , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[15]  G M Rubin,et al.  Gene disruptions using P transposable elements: an integral component of the Drosophila genome project. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  E. Trifonov,et al.  Mammalian retroposons integrate at kinkable DNA sites. , 1998, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[17]  M. Kay,et al.  Somatic integration and long-term transgene expression in normal and haemophilic mice using a DNA transposon system , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[18]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Molecular Reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty , a Tc1-like Transposon from Fish, and Its Transposition in Human Cells , 1997, Cell.

[19]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Sleeping Beauty, a wide host-range transposon vector for genetic transformation in vertebrates. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  W. Reznikoff,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the Tn5 synaptic complex transposition intermediate. , 2000, Science.

[21]  S. Sandmeyer,et al.  Requirement of RNA polymerase III transcription factors for in vitro position-specific integration of a retroviruslike element , 1995, Science.

[22]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Resident aliens: the Tc1/mariner superfamily of transposable elements. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  Ivanov Vi,et al.  [The A-form of DNA: in search of the biological role]. , 1994 .

[24]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Involvement of a Bifunctional, Paired-like DNA-binding Domain and a Transpositional Enhancer in Sleeping BeautyTransposition* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  G. S. Lee,et al.  Targeted Transposition by the V(D)J Recombinase , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  M. Breindl,et al.  Transcriptionally active genome regions are preferred targets for retrovirus integration , 1990, Journal of virology.

[27]  S. Haapa-Paananen,et al.  DNA Transposition of Bacteriophage Mu , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  D. Voytas,et al.  The Saccharomyces retrotransposon Ty5 integrates preferentially into regions of silent chromatin at the telomeres and mating loci. , 1996, Genes & development.

[29]  D. Voytas,et al.  Transposable elements and genome organization: a comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. , 1998, Genome research.

[30]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target-site consensus sequence. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H. Robertson,et al.  Factors affecting transposition of the Himar1 mariner transposon in vitro. , 1998, Genetics.

[32]  G M Rubin,et al.  Insertion site preferences of the P transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  B-DNA twisting correlates with base-pair morphology. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Target site choice of the related transposable elements Tc1 and Tc3 of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  W. Reznikoff,et al.  Tn5/IS50 target recognition. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Christina A. Cuomo,et al.  DNA sequence and structure requirements for cleavage of V(D)J recombination signal sequences , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[37]  A. Bradley,et al.  Chromosomal transposition of a Tc1/mariner-like element in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Regulated transposition of a fish transposon in the mouse germ line , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  A. Skalka,et al.  A Preferred Target DNA Structure for Retroviral Integrasein Vitro * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  P. Pribil,et al.  Substrate recognition and induced DNA deformation by transposase at the target-capture stage of Tn10 transposition. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from protein-DNA crystal complexes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  I. Brukner,et al.  Sequence‐dependent bending propensity of DNA as revealed by DNase I: parameters for trinucleotides. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[43]  R. Bryan,et al.  The crystal structure of EcoRV endonuclease and of its complexes with cognate and non-cognate DNA fragments. , 1993 .

[44]  J. Delcour,et al.  IS231A insertion specificity: consensus sequence and DNA bending at the target site , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[45]  F. Bushman,et al.  The influence of DNA and nucleosome structure on integration events directed by HIV integrase. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.