Using Heteroskedastic Ordered Probit Models to Recover Moments of Continuous Test Score Distributions From Coarsened Data

Test score distributions of schools or demographic groups are often summarized by frequencies of students scoring in a small number of ordered proficiency categories. We show that heteroskedastic ordered probit (HETOP) models can be used to estimate means and standard deviations of multiple groups’ test score distributions from such data. Because the scale of HETOP estimates is indeterminate up to a linear transformation, we develop formulas for converting the HETOP parameter estimates and their standard errors to a scale in which the population distribution of scores is standardized. We demonstrate and evaluate this novel application of the HETOP model with a simulation study and using real test score data from two sources. We find that the HETOP model produces unbiased estimates of group means and standard deviations, except when group sample sizes are small. In such cases, we demonstrate that a “partially heteroskedastic” ordered probit (PHOP) model can produce estimates with a smaller root mean squared error than the fully heteroskedastic model.

[1]  Mazen,et al.  Authors , 2019, 2019 IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy (CPERE).

[2]  David K. Park,et al.  The Plateau Problem in the Heteroskedastic Probit Model , 2015, 1508.03262.

[3]  Sean F. Reardon,et al.  Practical Issues in Estimating Achievement Gaps From Coarsened Data , 2015 .

[4]  Larry V Hedges,et al.  Reference Values of Within-District Intraclass Correlations of Academic Achievement by District Characteristics , 2014, Evaluation review.

[5]  R. Goddard,et al.  Assessing the Use of Aggregate Data in the Evaluation of School-Based Interventions , 2014 .

[6]  Derek C. Briggs Measuring Growth With Vertical Scales , 2013 .

[7]  G. Cizek,et al.  Setting performance standards : foundations, methods, and innovations , 2012 .

[8]  Richard Williams,et al.  Fitting Heterogeneous Choice Models with Oglm , 2010 .

[9]  W. Greene,et al.  Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer , 2010 .

[10]  Andrew D. Ho A Nonparametric Framework for Comparing Trends and Gaps Across Tests , 2009 .

[11]  Richard Williams,et al.  Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups , 2009 .

[12]  R. Kohn,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of a Random Effects Heteroscedastic Probit Model , 2008 .

[13]  Andrew D. Ho The Problem With “Proficiency”: Limitations of Statistics and Policy Under No Child Left Behind , 2008 .

[14]  L. Hedges,et al.  Intraclass Correlation Values for Planning Group-Randomized Trials in Education , 2007 .

[15]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[16]  Paul W. Holland,et al.  Two Measures of Change in the Gaps Between the CDFs of Test-Score Distributions , 2002 .

[17]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values , 1995 .

[18]  C. Cox,et al.  Location-scale cumulative odds models for ordinal data: a generalized non-linear model approach. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  E. Muraki,et al.  Chapter 3: Scaling Procedures in NAEP , 1992 .

[20]  Michael Keane,et al.  A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model , 1992 .

[21]  佐竹 元一郎,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models--Regression,Analysis of Variance,and Experimental Designs 3rd ed./John Neter et al.(1990) , 1991 .

[22]  C B Begg,et al.  A General Regression Methodology for ROC Curve Estimation , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  J. Horowitz,et al.  An Investigation of the Accuracy of the Clark Approximation for the Multinomial Probit Model , 1982 .

[24]  F. Lord Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[25]  R. E. Carlson,et al.  Monotone Piecewise Cubic Interpolation , 1980 .

[26]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[27]  L. A. Goodman On the Exact Variance of Products , 1960 .

[28]  Sean F. Reardon,et al.  Estimating Achievement Gaps from Test Scores Reported in Ordinal "Proficiency" Categories , 2011 .

[29]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  A mixed ordinal location scale model for analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data. , 2009, Statistics and its interface.

[30]  Luke Keele,et al.  Difficult Choices: An Evaluation of Heterogenous Choice Models , 2005 .

[31]  P. McCullagh Regression Models for Ordinal Data , 1980 .

[32]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .