Stability and change in typical intellectual engagement in old age across 5 years.

OBJECTIVES Typical intellectual engagement (TIE) is related to cognitive development across the life span, but the development of TIE itself has not been examined. In the present study, structural change, differential change, absolute change, stability of divergence, and the generality of changes in the 4 TIE-factors abstract thinking, problem solving, reading, and intellectual curiosity across 5 years were examined in older adults. METHOD Data came from the Zurich Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging. Two hundred and thirty-three individuals, 73 years on average at first measurement occasion (2005), were reassessed after 5 years. Confirmatory factor analyses and latent change score models were applied. RESULTS Factor covariances were equal across time, implying structural stability. Coefficients for differential stability were around .80, implying small significant mean-level changes for problem solving and intellectual curiosity. No changes in divergence emerged. Change correlations between the factors were in the medium to large range. DISCUSSION Across 5 years, TIE remained relatively stable on a group level. However, pronounced interindividual differences emerged. Also, although the changes in factors shared a substantial amount of variance, the development of the factors was not completely parallel.

[1]  D. Zimprich,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Typical Intellectual Engagement Between Young and Old Adults , 2012, Experimental aging research.

[2]  P. Mussel Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity , 2010 .

[3]  D. Zimprich,et al.  Five views of a secret: does cognition change during middle adulthood? , 2010, European journal of ageing.

[4]  Mike Martin,et al.  Comparing age effects in normally and extremely highly educated and intellectually engaged 65 - 80 year-olds: potential protection from deficit through educational and intellectual activities across the lifespan. , 2009, Current aging science.

[5]  Matthew,et al.  Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy , 2009 .

[6]  Mike Martin,et al.  Cognitive Abilities in Old Age: Results from the Zurich Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging , 2008 .

[7]  Mike Martin,et al.  Long-term correlated change in personality traits in old age. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[8]  A. Furnham,et al.  Cognitive ability, learning approaches and personality correlates of general knowledge , 2008 .

[9]  D. Zimprich,et al.  Typical Intellectual Engagement and Cognition in Old Age , 2008, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[10]  P. Harms,et al.  Integrating personality and intelligence: Typical intellectual engagement and need for cognition , 2007 .

[11]  R. Forsterlee Personality, Interest, and Motivational Determinants of Maximal and Typical Performances on a Verbal Knowledge Task , 2007 .

[12]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adulthood and old age. , 2007, Journal of personality.

[13]  Jeanne A. Teresi,et al.  An Essay on Measurement and Factorial Invariance , 2006, Medical care.

[14]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Incremental Validity of the Typical Intellectual Engagement Scale As Predictor of Different Academic Performance Measures , 2006, Journal of personality assessment.

[15]  M. Riediger,et al.  Focusing and restricting: two aspects of motivational selectivity in adulthood. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[16]  I. Deary,et al.  The personality-intelligence interface : insights from an ageing cohort , 2005 .

[17]  R. Dixon,et al.  Stability and change in adult personality over 6 years: findings from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[18]  Keith F. Widaman,et al.  New Methods for the Analysis of Change , 2003 .

[19]  Heinz-Martin Süß,et al.  Interindividuelle Unterschiede im typischen intellektuellen Engagement , 2003 .

[20]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[21]  B. Roberts,et al.  Personality development and growth in women across 30 years: three perspectives. , 2002, Journal of personality.

[22]  C. Schooler,et al.  The reciprocal effects of leisure time activities and intellectual functioning in older people: a longitudinal analysis. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[23]  C. Schooler,et al.  The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Eamonn Ferguson,et al.  A facet and factor analysis of typical intellectual engagement (TIE): Associations with locus of control and the five factor model of personality , 1999 .

[25]  R. Keefover,et al.  Aging and cognition. , 1998, Neurologic clinics.

[26]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. , 1995 .

[27]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Typical intellectual engagement and personality: Reply to Rocklin (1994). , 1994 .

[28]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Personality-intelligence relations: assessment of typical intellectual engagement , 1992 .

[29]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Aging and cognition: Research methodologies and empirical advances. , 2009 .

[30]  B. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Mike Martin,et al.  Cognitive Development in Midlife , 2005 .

[32]  S. Willis,et al.  Middle adulthood : a lifespan perspective , 2005 .

[33]  J. Mcardle,et al.  Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. , 2001 .

[34]  William Meredith,et al.  The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. , 2001 .

[35]  Linda M. Collins,et al.  New methods for the analysis of change , 2001 .

[36]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[37]  Spiridon Penev,et al.  Nested structural equation models: Noncentrality and power of restriction test , 1998 .

[38]  K. Schaie,et al.  The relationship between prior functioning on cognitive and personality dimensions and subject attrition in longitudinal research. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[39]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .