Prognosis of cancer survivors: estimation based on differential equations

Summary We present a method for estimating several prognosis parameters for cancer survivors. The method utilizes the fact that these parameters solve differential equations driven by cumulative hazards. By expressing the parameters as solutions to differential equations, we develop generic estimators that are easy to implement with standard statistical software. We explicitly describe the estimators for prognosis parameters that are often employed in practice, but also for parameters that, to our knowledge, have not been used to evaluate prognosis. We then apply these parameters to assess the prognosis of five common cancers in Norway.

[1]  B. Rachet,et al.  Summarizing and communicating on survival data according to the audience: a tutorial on different measures illustrated with population-based cancer registry data , 2019, Clinical epidemiology.

[2]  K. Røysland,et al.  On null hypotheses in survival analysis , 2018, Biometrics.

[3]  Maja Pohar Perme,et al.  Nonparametric Relative Survival Analysis with the R Package relsurv , 2018 .

[4]  R. Merrill Conditional relative survival among female breast cancer patients in the United States , 2018, The breast journal.

[5]  K. Straif,et al.  Lung cancer and socioeconomic status in a pooled analysis of case-control studies , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  K. Røysland,et al.  Transforming cumulative hazard estimates , 2017, Biometrika.

[7]  O. Aalen,et al.  Exploring Selection Bias by Causal Frailty Models: The Magnitude Matters. , 2017, Epidemiology.

[8]  B. Rachet,et al.  Analysing population-based cancer survival – settling the controversies , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[9]  M. Banerjee,et al.  Conditional survival in advanced colorectal cancer and surgery. , 2016, The Journal of surgical research.

[10]  O. Aalen,et al.  Does Cox analysis of a randomized survival study yield a causal treatment effect? , 2015, Lifetime Data Analysis.

[11]  Richard J. Cook,et al.  Does Cox analysis of a randomized survival study yield a causal treatment effect? , 2015, Lifetime data analysis.

[12]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Cancer survival: an overview of measures, uses, and interpretation. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[13]  H. Wulf,et al.  Socioeconomic status and cutaneous malignant melanoma in Northern Europe , 2014, The British journal of dermatology.

[14]  Janez Stare,et al.  On Estimation in Relative Survival , 2012, Biometrics.

[15]  B. Møller,et al.  Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway , 2011 .

[16]  Hermann Brenner,et al.  Clinical relevance of conditional survival of cancer patients in europe: age-specific analyses of 13 cancers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Miguel A Hernán,et al.  The hazards of hazard ratios. , 2010, Epidemiology.

[18]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Prognosis for long-term survivors of cancer. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  O. Aalen Effects of frailty in survival analysis , 1994, Statistical methods in medical research.

[20]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes , 1993 .

[21]  F. Ederer,et al.  The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. , 1961, National Cancer Institute monograph.