Do assessment methods matter? A sensitivity test

A good assessment method should be able to distinguish between deep learners and surface learners in a way so the former are rewarded while the later are punished. Using data of a survey conducted at the Institute of Contemporary Chinese Studies, University of Nottingham, the study finds strong evidence that assignment essays serve to reward deep learners and punish surface learners, while formal examinations fail to do so. The policy implication of the study is clear and straightforward: assignment essays should be preferable over formal examination in higher education, at least in so far as the humanities and social sciences are concerned. The study is, however, limited in the scope of empirical coverage, and further effort should be made to find out whether the findings in this study are applicable to other settings.

[1]  L. Ritter.  The Quest for an Effective Form of Assessment: The evolution and evaluation of a controlled assessment procedure (CAP) , 2000 .

[2]  Keithia Wilson *,et al.  Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs , 2005 .

[3]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  David Watkins,et al.  Depth of processing and the quality of learning outcomes , 1983 .

[5]  J. Baird.  Quality: What Should Make Higher Education ‘Higher'? , 1988 .

[6]  Bill Cox,et al.  Practical Pointers for University Teachers , 1994 .

[7]  E. Maclellan,et al.  How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education , 2004 .

[8]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[9]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations , 1992 .

[10]  Paul Ramsden.  Context and strategy: Situational influences on learning. , 1988 .

[11]  K. Scouller.  The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[12]  J. B. Biggs.  Study Behaviour and Performance in Objective and Essay Formats , 1973 .

[13]  Anton Havnes,et al.  Examination and learning: an activity‐theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice , 2004 .

[14]  Caroline Baillie,et al.  The ‘Power Test’: its impact on student learning in a materials science course for engineering students , 1997 .

[15]  K. A. Percy,et al.  Student and staff perceptions and “the pursuit of excellence” in british higher education , 1976 .

[16]  D. Bligh.  Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[17]  David Kember,et al.  Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students , 2000 .

[18]  J. Fuente,et al.  The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level , 2008 .

[19]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[20]  Michael Prosser,et al.  The “How” and “What” of learning physics , 1989 .

[21]  E. V. Rossum,et al.  The Relationship between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome. , 1984 .

[22]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Educational Testing , 1989 .

[23]  K. G. Collier.  Teaching Methods in Higher Education: The Changing Scene, with Special Reference to Small‐group Work , 1985 .

[24]  Mantz Yorke,et al.  Coursework Marks High, Examination Marks Low: Discuss , 2002 .