A toolkit for optimizing fish passage barrier mitigation actions

Summary The presence of dams, stream–road crossings and other infrastructure often compromises the connectivity of rivers, leading to reduced fish abundance and diversity. The assessment and mitigation of river barriers is critical to the success of restoration efforts aimed at restoring river integrity. In this study, we present a combined modelling approach involving statistical regression methods and mixed integer linear programming to maximize resident fish species richness within a catchment through targeted barrier mitigation. Compared to existing approaches, our proposed method provides enhanced biological realism while avoiding the use of complex and computationally intensive population/ecosystem models. To estimate barrier passability quickly and at low cost, we further outline a rapid barrier assessment methodology. The methodology is used to characterize potential passage barriers for various fish species common to the UK but can be readily adapted to different planning areas and other species of interest. We demonstrate the applicability of our barrier assessment and prioritization approach based on a case study of the River Wey, located in south-east England. We find that significant increases in species richness can be achieved for modest investment in barrier mitigation. In particular, dams and weirs with low passability located on mid- to high-order streams are identified as top priorities for mitigation. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows the benefits of combining a coarse resolution barrier assessment methodology with state-of-the-art optimization modelling to cost-effectively plan fish passage barrier mitigation actions. The modelling approach can help inform on-the-ground river restoration decision-making by providing a recommended course of action that best allocates limited resources in order to restore longitudinal connectivity and maximize ecological gains.

[1]  C. Pringle What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important? , 2003 .

[2]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer , 2004 .

[3]  Jesse R. O’Hanley,et al.  Recommendations for a "coarse-resolution rapid-assessment" methodology to assess barriers to fish migration, and associated prioritization tools , 2008 .

[4]  Min-Ho Jang,et al.  Availability of and access to critical habitats in regulated rivers: effects of low‐head barriers on threatened lampreys , 2009 .

[5]  A. Bednarek Undamming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal , 2001, Environmental management.

[6]  Jesse R. O’Hanley Using the right tool to get the job done : Recommendations on the use of exact and heuristics methods for solving resource allocation problems in environmental planning and management , 2009 .

[7]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .

[8]  Yolanda F. Wiersma,et al.  A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  J. Nelson,et al.  Changes in the Habitat and Fish Community of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin, Following Removal of the Woolen Mills Dam , 1997 .

[10]  C. Revelle,et al.  A multiobjective optimization model for dam removal: an example trading off salmon passage with hydropower and water storage in the Willamette basin , 2005 .

[11]  Y. Wiersma,et al.  Barriers to fish passage and barriers to fish passage assessments: the impact of assessment methods and assumptions on barrier identification and quantification of watershed connectivity , 2011, Aquatic Ecology.

[12]  Rebecca Ng,et al.  Implications of Dam Obstruction for Global Freshwater Fish Diversity , 2012 .

[13]  Y. Wiersma,et al.  Evaluating the Barrier Assessment Technique Derived from FishXing Software and the Upstream Movement of Brook Trout through Road Culverts , 2014 .

[14]  G. Grant,et al.  1000 dams down and counting , 2015, Science.

[15]  R. Gresswell,et al.  INFLUENCE OF BARRIERS TO MOVEMENT ON WITHIN‐WATERSHED GENETIC VARIATION OF COASTAL CUTTHROAT TROUT , 2005 .

[16]  David Tomberlin,et al.  Optimizing the removal of small fish passage barriers , 2005 .

[17]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  R. Saunders,et al.  DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF STREAM FISHES IN RELATION TO BARRIERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR MONITORING STREAM RECOVERY AFTER BARRIER REMOVAL , 2013 .

[19]  I. Cowx,et al.  Restoring River Connectivity: Prioritizing Passage Improvements for Diadromous Fishes and Lampreys , 2012, AMBIO.

[20]  P. Consul,et al.  A Generalization of the Poisson Distribution , 1973 .

[21]  Jean-Claude Philippart,et al.  The impact of small physical obstacles on upstream movements of six species of fish , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[22]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[23]  Jed Wright,et al.  Restoring stream habitat connectivity: a proposed method for prioritizing the removal of resident fish passage barriers. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  P. Kočovský,et al.  Prioritizing removal of dams for passage of diadromous fishes on a major river system , 2009 .

[25]  F. WiersmaYolanda,et al.  Assessing the biological relevance of aquatic connectivity to stream fish communities , 2014 .

[26]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[27]  Jesse R. O’Hanley,et al.  Optimal Fish Passage Barrier Removal—Revisited , 2016 .

[28]  B. Lehner,et al.  An index-based framework for assessing patterns and trends in river fragmentation and flow regulation by global dams at multiple scales , 2017 .

[29]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Valuing a Multistate River: The Case of the River Murray , 2011 .

[30]  W. Roche,et al.  Comparison of field‐ and GIS‐based assessments of barriers to Atlantic salmon migration: a case study in the Nore Catchment, Republic of Ireland , 2011 .

[31]  M. Larinier,et al.  Fish locks and fish lifts , 2002 .

[32]  Timothy J. Randle,et al.  Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: River channel and floodplain geomorphic change , 2014 .

[33]  Jesse R. O'Hanley,et al.  Probability chains: A general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Kris Wernstedt,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Complex Managed Hydrosystems: An Application to the Columbia River Basin , 1995 .

[35]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Effects of Culverts on Stream Fish Assemblages in the Alberta Foothills , 2012 .

[36]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Predicting road culvert passability for migratory fishes , 2014 .

[37]  J. O’Hanley,et al.  Open rivers: barrier removal planning and the restoration of free-flowing rivers. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  Jesse R. O’Hanley,et al.  Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis , 2010 .

[39]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[40]  G. Pess,et al.  A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 2002 .

[41]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Optimizing multiple dam removals under multiple objectives: Linking tributary habitat and the Lake Erie ecosystem , 2009 .

[42]  J. David Allan,et al.  Restoring aquatic ecosystem connectivity requires expanding inventories of both dams and road crossings , 2013 .

[43]  M. Catalano,et al.  Effects of Dam Removal on Fish Assemblage Structure and Spatial Distributions in the Baraboo River, Wisconsin , 2007 .

[44]  Robert C. Hilldale,et al.  Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: fluvial sediment load , 2015 .

[45]  M. Fedora,et al.  Effects of Road Crossings on Habitat Connectivity for Stream‐Resident Fish , 2015 .