Quantitative texture analysis of brain white matter lesions derived from T2-weighted MR images in MS patients with clinically isolated syndrome.

INTRODUCTION This study investigates the application of texture analysis methods on brain T2-white matter lesions detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prognosis of future disability in subjects diagnosed with clinical isolated syndrome (CIS) of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS Brain lesions and normal appearing white matter (NAWM) from 38 symptomatic untreated subjects diagnosed with CIS as well as normal white matter (NWM) from 20 healthy volunteers, were manually segmented, by an experienced MS neurologist, on transverse T2-weighted images obtained from serial brain MR imaging scans (0 and 6-12 months). Additional clinical information in the form of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), a scale from 0 to 10, which provides a way of quantifying disability in MS and monitoring the changes over time in the level of disability, were also provided. Shape and most importantly different texture features including GLCM and laws were then extracted for all above regions, after image intensity normalization. RESULTS The findings showed that: (i) there were significant differences for the texture futures extracted between the NAWM and lesions at 0 month and between NAWM and lesions at 6-12 months. However, no significant differences were found for all texture features extracted when comparing lesions temporally at 0 and 6-12 months with the exception of contrast (gray level difference statistics-GLDS) and difference entropy (spatial gray level dependence matrix-SGLDM); (ii) significant differences were found between NWM and NAWM for most of the texture features investigated in this study; (iii) there were significant differences found for the lesion texture features at 0 month for those with EDSS≤2 versus those with EDSS>2 (mean, median, inverse difference moment and sum average) and for the lesion texture features at 6-12 months with EDSS>2 and EDSS≤2 for the texture features (mean, median, entropy and sum average). It should be noted that whilst there were no differences in entropy at time 0 between the two groups, significant change was observed at 6-12 months, relating the corresponding features to the follow-up and disability (EDSS) progression. For the NAWM, significant differences were found between 0 month and 6-12 months with EDSS≤2 (contrast, inverse difference moment), for 6-12 months for EDSS>2 and 0 month with EDSS>2 (difference entropy) and for 6-12 months for EDSS>2 and EDSS≤2 (sum average); (iv) there was no significant difference for NAWM and the lesion texture features (for both 0 and 6-12 months) for subjects with no change in EDSS score versus subjects with increased EDSS score from 2 to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study provide evidence that texture features of T2 MRI brain white matter lesions may have an additional potential role in the clinical evaluation of MRI images in MS and perhaps may provide some prognostic evidence in relation to future disability of patients. However, a larger scale study is needed to establish the application in clinical practice and for computing shape and texture features that may provide information for better and earlier differentiation between normal brain tissue and MS lesions.

[1]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[2]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  E Le Rumeur,et al.  MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale Amplitude-Modulation Frequency-Modulation (AM–FM) Texture Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis in Brain MRI Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Joseph Ross Mitchell,et al.  T2 MRI texture analysis is a sensitive measure of tissue injury and recovery resulting from acute inflammatory lesions in multiple sclerosis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[9]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Texture analysis of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  R I Grossman,et al.  Quantitative volumetric magnetization transfer analysis in multiple sclerosis: Estimation of macroscopic and microscopic disease burden , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  C. Pattichis,et al.  Quantitative analysis of brain white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis subjects , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[12]  H. Eskola,et al.  MRI texture analysis in multiple sclerosis: toward a clinical analysis protocol. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[13]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Diffusion tensor tract-specific analysis of the uncinate fasciculus in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. , 2013, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[15]  A. J. Thompson,et al.  Increasing normal–appearing grey and white matter magnetisation transfer ratio abnormality in early relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[16]  C. Pattichis,et al.  Brain MR image normalization in texture analysis of multiple sclerosis , 2009 .

[17]  F. Barkhof,et al.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 1999, Neurology.

[18]  D. Miller,et al.  MR brain scanning in patients with vasculitis: differentiation from multiple sclerosis , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[19]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[20]  S. Prabhakar,et al.  Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging differentiation. , 2000, Australasian radiology.

[21]  C. Poser,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis , 2001, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[22]  Nixon,et al.  Feature Extraction & Image Processing , 2008 .

[23]  David H. Miller,et al.  Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  Classification of disease subgroup and correlation with disease severity using magnetic resonance imaging whole-brain histograms: application to magnetization transfer ratios and multiple sclerosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Jian Wang,et al.  Impaired white-matter integrity in photosensitive epilepsy: a DTI study using tract-based spatial statistics. , 2014, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[26]  A. Kassner,et al.  Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[27]  A. J. Thompson,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: assessment of disability and disability scales , 1998, Journal of Neurology.

[28]  J Chambron,et al.  Distinct patterns of active and non-active plaques using texture analysis on brain NMR images in multiple sclerosis patients: preliminary results. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  L. Kappos,et al.  MR Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: Review and Recommendations for Current Practice , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[30]  S. Reingold,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria” , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[31]  A J Thompson,et al.  Texture analysis of magnetization transfer maps from patients with clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  A J Thompson,et al.  Correlations between changes in disability and T2‐weighted brain MRI activity in multiple sclerosis , 1995, Neurology.

[33]  H. Eskola,et al.  Comparison of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Texture Analysis Findings on Classification of Multiple Sclerosis Patients , 2011 .

[34]  Vassili A. Kovalev,et al.  Texture Anisotropy of the Brain's White Matter as Revealed by Anatomical MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[36]  C. Laule,et al.  Pathological correlates of magnetic resonance imaging texture heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[37]  P. Tofts,et al.  Texture analysis of spinal cord pathology in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Yung-Chang Chen,et al.  Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[39]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Brain White Matter Lesions Classification in Multiple Sclerosis Subjects for the Prognosis of Future Disability , 2011, EANN/AIAI.

[40]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  Time-series analysis of MRI intensity patterns in multiple sclerosis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[41]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.