Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance

American lobsters, Homarus americanus, form stable dominance relationships in captivity. Size, sex and stage in the moult cycle are important determinants for dominance. Other factors, such as recent agonistic experience play a role. This paper investigates how lobsters maintain their stable dominance relationships: they may recognize individuals or alternatively, recognize overall dominance status. We paired lobsters in two consecutive 'boxing matches'. Results indicate that lobsters remember familiar opponents when kept either in isolation or in communal tanks for 24 h between their first and second fights. Subordinates immediately backed away from familiar dominants, avoiding a second fight. In some animals, this memory lasted between 1-2 weeks if pairs were kept separate between the first and second fights. When paired for the second fight against unfamiliar dominant lobsters, subordinate lobsters from first fights actively fought and won the encounter. These results suggest that lobsters are capable of 'individual recognition'. In nature, the observed social organization of lobsters may be maintained by individual recognition of a small number of residents inhabiting separate, nearby shelters. (c) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

[1]  B. Hazlett.  Size relationships and aggressive behavior in the hermit crab Clibanarium vittatus. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[2]  J. Atema,et al.  Olfactory Recognition of Urine Signals in Dominance Fights Between Male Lobster, Homarus Americanus , 1998 .

[3]  V. R. Johnson.  Individual recognition in the banded shrimp Stenopus hispidus (Olivier) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  B. Hazlett.  “Individual” Recognition and Agonistic Behaviour in Pagurus bernhardus , 1969, Nature.

[5]  J. Atema,et al.  Moult staggering and serial monogamy in American lobsters, Homarus americanus , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  T. Eisner,et al.  Chemical ecology. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Jelle Atema,et al.  Shelter sharing and chemical courtship signals in the lobster, Homarus americanus , 1997 .

[8]  Evidence of Migration and Homing of Lobsters (Homarus americanus) on the Scotian Shelf , 1986 .

[9]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Social and individual recognition in rodents: Methodological aspects and neurobiological bases , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  E. Kravitz,et al.  A quantitative analysis of agonistic behavior in juvenile American lobsters (Homarus americanus L.). , 1995, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[11]  D. Cowan.  The Role of Olfaction in Courtship Behavior of the American Lobster Homarus americanus. , 1991, The Biological bulletin.

[12]  J. Cobb,et al.  Behavior and the Crustacean Molt Cycle: Changes in Aggression of Homarus americanus , 1978, Science.

[13]  A. Sastry,et al.  Dominance hierarchies among communally held juvenile lobsters, Homarus americanus , 1980 .

[14]  C. Barnard,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition". , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Douglis Mb.  Interspecies relationships between certain crustaceans. , 1946 .

[16]  R. Caldwell.  A test of individual recognition in the stomatopod Gonodactylus festate , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  E. Wilson.  7 – Chemical Communication within Animal Species , 1970 .

[18]  F. H. Herrick.  The American lobster; a study of its habits and development , 2012 .

[19]  J. Atema,et al.  Field Observations of Social Behavior, Shelter Use, and Foraging in the Lobster, Homarus americanus. , 1989, The Biological bulletin.

[20]  G. P. Ennis.  Small-scale seasonal movements of the American lobster Homarus americanus , 1984 .

[21]  R. D. Alexander,et al.  Aggressiveness, Territoriality, and Sexual Behavior in Field Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) , 1961 .

[22]  Jelle Atema,et al.  Chapter 13 – Behavior and Sensory Biology , 1995 .

[23]  J. Atema,et al.  Natural Dynamics of Population Structure and Habitat Use of the Lobster, Homarus americanus, in a Shallow Cove. , 1989, The Biological bulletin.

[24]  G. P. Ennis.  Territorial Behavior of the American Lobster Homarus americanus , 1984 .

[25]  Newton H. Copp,et al.  DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES IN THE CRAYFISH PROCAMBARUS CLARKII (GIRARD, 1852) AND THE QUESTION OF LEARNED INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION (DECAPODA, ASTACIDEA) , 1986 .

[26]  C. Drews.  THE CONCEPT AND DEFINITION OF DOMINANCE IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR , 1993 .

[27]  M. D. Beecher.  Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Agonistic Encounters in the American Lobster, Homarus americanus: Do They Remember Their Opponents? , 1993, The Biological bulletin.

[29]  J. Atema.  Review of Sexual Selection and Chemical Communication in the Lobster, Homarus americanus , 1986 .

[30]  A. Sastry,et al.  Effects of environmental manipulation on the locomotor activity and agonistic behavior of cultured juvenile American lobsters, Homarus americanus , 1978 .

[31]  M. Winston,et al.  Dominance and effects of strange conspecifics on aggressive interactions in the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus (Say) , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  B. Phillips,et al.  The Biology and Management of Lobsters , 1980 .