Spatial scaling of temporal changes in avian communities

Aim Biodiversity patterns and the mechanisms driving these patterns are inherently scale dependent. Studies investigating biodiversity scaling have focused mostly on evaluating community turnover without taking into consideration its underlying processes of local extinction (hereafter, extinction) and colonization. Our goal was to evaluate the spatial scaling of change in avian assemblages through time and identify environmental drivers of community-wide dynamics across a range of spatial scales, with a focus on extinction and colonization. Location New York State. Methods We analysed community dissimilarity, temporal turnover, extinction and colonization as measures of temporal change in avian communities at five spatial resolutions (5 × 5, 10 × 10, 20 × 20, 40 × 40 and 80 km × 80 km). We evaluated the relationships between community change and change in climatic conditions, landscape fragmentation and elevation at each spatial grain using Bayesian spatially varying intercept models. Results We found that the decline in colonization with increasing spatial scale was less steep than the decline in community dissimilarity, temporal turnover or extinction. We also found that the importance of environmental drivers to community change was dependent on both scale and metric, though we did not find optimal spatial scales at which either landscape or climatic processes consistently drove patterns of community change. Landscape characteristics were the most important correlate of extinction at all spatial scales, while colonization was not predicted well by any of the environmental factors. Main conclusions The slower decline in colonization across spatial grains is probably a consequence of the high mobility and dispersal abilities of birds. We further conclude that the two processes underlying community change – extinction and colonization – are driven by different factors. Landscape characteristics strongly affect the rates of extinctions in avian communities. On the contrary, patterns of colonization are likely to be a result of intrinsic characteristics of birds – specifically, high dispersal ability – that allow them to colonize new sites, regardless of the environmental context.

[1]  Marta A. Jarzyna,et al.  Landscape fragmentation affects responses of avian communities to climate change , 2015, Global change biology.

[2]  B. Zuckerberg,et al.  Climate change in our backyards: the reshuffling of North America's winter bird communities , 2015, Global change biology.

[3]  W. Jetz,et al.  Downscaling the environmental associations and spatial patterns of species richness. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  F. Hendrickx,et al.  Local extinction processes rather than edge effects affect ground beetle assemblages from fragmented and urbanised old beech forests , 2014 .

[5]  Andrew O. Finley,et al.  spBayes for Large Univariate and Multivariate Point-Referenced Spatio-Temporal Data Models , 2013, 1310.8192.

[6]  Janet W. Dyk,et al.  SUMMARY OF RESULTS , 1968, Virtual Pilgrimage.

[7]  Quentin Groom,et al.  Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW-European pollinators and plants , 2013, Ecology letters.

[8]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Invasive Plants Have Scale-Dependent Effects on Diversity by Altering Species-Area Relationships , 2013, Science.

[9]  J. Metzger,et al.  Unraveling the drivers of community dissimilarity and species extinction in fragmented landscapes. , 2012, Ecology.

[10]  Kenneth W. McDonald,et al.  Diversity of birds in eastern North America shifts north with global warming , 2012, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  L. Fahrig,et al.  What size is a biologically relevant landscape? , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  Carrie A. Schloss,et al.  Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Biodiversity change is scale-dependent: an example from Dutch and UK hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) , 2011 .

[14]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Cross-scale variation in species richness–environment associations , 2011 .

[15]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data , 2011 .

[16]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Bird population trends are linearly affected by climate change along species thermal ranges , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Integrating spatial and temporal approaches to understanding species richness , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  C. Field,et al.  The velocity of climate change , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Andrew M. Wilson The Second Atlas of Breeding Birds in New York State , 2009 .

[20]  C. A. Howell,et al.  Re-Shuffling of Species with Climate Disruption: A No-Analog Future for California Birds? , 2009, PloS one.

[21]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: A review , 2009 .

[22]  M. Palmer,et al.  Modeling the sampling effect in the species-time-area relationship. , 2009, Ecology.

[23]  Richard Field,et al.  Spatial species‐richness gradients across scales: a meta‐analysis , 2009 .

[24]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets , 2008, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[25]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Spatial turnover in the global avifauna , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  P. Legendre,et al.  Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. , 2006, Ecology.

[27]  R. Peet,et al.  Integration of Local and Regional Species‐Area Relationships from Space‐Time Species Accumulation , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[28]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[29]  R. Pearson Climate change and the migration capacity of species. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR A GENERAL SPECIES–TIME–AREA RELATIONSHIP , 2005 .

[31]  Brian D. Inouye,et al.  SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY EXPLAINS THE SCALE DEPENDENCE OF THE NATIVE-EXOTIC DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIP , 2005 .

[32]  T. Gavin,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN A FRAGMENTED TROPICAL LANDSCAPE , 2005 .

[33]  C. Rahbek The role of spatial scale and the perception of large‐scale species‐richness patterns , 2004 .

[34]  Richard Fox,et al.  Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change , 2004, Nature.

[35]  L. Joseph 4. Bayesian data analysis (2nd edn). Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern and Donald B. Rubin (eds), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2003. No. of pages: xxv + 668. Price: $59.95. ISBN 1‐58488‐388‐X , 2004 .

[36]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[37]  William E. Kunin,et al.  Scale Dependency of Rarity, Extinction Risk, and Conservation Priority , 2003 .

[38]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation , 2003, Oecologia.

[39]  P. Adler,et al.  The power of time: spatiotemporal scaling of species diversity , 2003 .

[40]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data , 2003 .

[41]  J. Travis Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Large‐scale dynamics in colonization and extinction for breeding birds in Britain , 2002 .

[43]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Species Diversity--Scale Matters , 2002, Science.

[44]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale , 2001 .

[45]  M. Palmer,et al.  How fast is the carousel? Direct indices of species mobility with examples from an Oklahoma grassland , 2001 .

[46]  C. Thomas Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  C. Johnson,et al.  Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance , 1998, Nature.

[48]  J. Bissonette,et al.  The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice , 1997 .

[50]  P. Brussard,et al.  Matters of scale. , 1993, Science.

[51]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[52]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  Effects of scale and disturbance on rates of immigration and extinction of species in prairies , 1992 .

[53]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes , 1987, Science.

[54]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[55]  O. Arrhenius,et al.  Species and Area , 1921 .

[56]  P. Jaccard THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[57]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale , 2014 .

[58]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[59]  D. Currie Scaling Biodiversity: Regional-to-global patterns of biodiversity, and what they have to say about mechanisms , 2007 .

[60]  G. Englund,et al.  Scale dependence of immigration rates: models, metrics and data. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[61]  K. Gaston,et al.  Scaling Biodiversity: The scaling of spatial turnover: pruning the thicket , 2007 .

[62]  R. Waide,et al.  A comparison of the species–time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups , 2006 .

[63]  R. Ricklefs A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity , 2004 .

[64]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[65]  S. Juliano BODY SIZE, DISPERSAL ABILITY, AND RANGE SIZE IN NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF BRACHINUS (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) , 1983 .