The cost of foreign ownership: Voluntary sustainability reporting and financial performance in an emerging economy
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mina Glambosky,et al. Stock market response to the statement on the purpose of a corporation: A vindication of stakeholder theory , 2023, Corporate Governance: An International Review.
[2] Samuel Tang,et al. Do Not Forget the “How” along with the “What”: Improving the Transparency of Sustainability Reports , 2022, California Management Review.
[3] Emmanuel Adegbite,et al. Transfer of corporate governance practices into weak emerging market environments by foreign institutional investors , 2022, International Business Review.
[4] Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz,et al. Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets , 2022, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
[5] J. Gupta,et al. Multidimensional corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance: A meta‐analytical review , 2022, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
[6] S. F. Khatib,et al. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: the case of Jordan , 2021, SN Business & Economics.
[7] Ricardo Malagueño,et al. An empirical study of sustainability reporting assurance: current trends and new insights , 2021, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.
[8] William L. Megginson,et al. Foreign ownership and corporate excess perks , 2021, Journal of International Business Studies.
[9] F. W. Agbola,et al. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Enhance Financial Performance? Evidence from Australia , 2021, Australian Accounting Review.
[10] A. Gil-Lacruz,et al. Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021 , 2021, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
[11] Nai H. Lamb,et al. Cultural imprints: Emerging market multinationals’ post-acquisition corporate social performance , 2021 .
[12] T. Mallikarjunappa,et al. CSR expenditure, mandatory CSR reporting and financial performance of listed firms in India: an institutional theory perspective , 2020, Meditari Accountancy Research.
[13] D. Jamali,et al. Corporate Governance Meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Interface , 2020, Business & Society.
[14] Rekha Rao‐Nicholson,et al. Multinational enterprises and Sustainable Development Goals: A foreign subsidiary perspective on tackling wicked problems , 2020, Journal of International Business Policy.
[15] D. Štreimikienė,et al. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods , 2020, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
[16] Cristina Gaio,et al. Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting , 2020 .
[17] Samuel Tang,et al. On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports , 2020, Journal of Business Research.
[18] Melsa Ararat,et al. Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: A Selective Review and an Agenda for Future Research , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[19] Moustafa Salman Haj Youssef,et al. The more you value, the less you practice: a study on culture and managerial discretion , 2019 .
[20] C. Lau. The economic consequences of business sustainability initiatives , 2019, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
[21] J. Aguilera-Caracuel,et al. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack , 2019, Journal of Business Ethics.
[22] I. García‐Sánchez,et al. Female directors and impression management in sustainability reporting , 2019, International Business Review.
[23] Lujie Chen,et al. Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China , 2019, Business & Society.
[24] Aziz Jaafar,et al. Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan , 2019, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
[25] Selim Zaim,et al. Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey , 2019, International Business Review.
[26] James J. Cordeiro,et al. Ownership influences on corporate social responsibility in the Indian context , 2018 .
[27] Haizhi Wang,et al. Learning Chinese? The Changing Investment Behavior of Foreign Institutions in the Chinese Stock Market , 2018, International Review of Financial Analysis.
[28] T. Kostova,et al. Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals , 2018, Journal of International Business Studies.
[29] B. Head. Forty years of wicked problems literature: forging closer links to policy studies , 2018, Policy and Society.
[30] Archana Singh,et al. Institutional ownership and firm performance: evidence from Indian panel data , 2018 .
[31] Sascha Raithel,et al. Corporate Social Performance, Firm Size, and Organizational Visibility: Distinct and Joint Effects on Voluntary Sustainability Reporting , 2018 .
[32] Nai H. Lamb,et al. Buying to Be Socially Responsible: Emerging Market Multinational Corporations' Cross-Border Acquisitions and Corporate Social Performance , 2018 .
[33] Valérie Moatti,et al. “Teaching the Sushi Chef”: Hybridization Work and CSR Integration in a Japanese Multinational Company , 2018 .
[34] C. Witte,et al. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: The contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Development Goals , 2017 .
[35] Karl V. Lins,et al. Do Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? International Evidence , 2017, Journal of Financial Economics.
[36] I. García‐Sánchez,et al. Mitigating information asymmetry through sustainability assurance: The role of accountants and levels of assurance , 2017 .
[37] G. Hendriks. The Sustainable Development Effects of Investment by Emerging Market Multinationals: Shaping Beneficial Outcomes for Home and Host Country , 2017 .
[38] Rupali Misra,et al. Sustainability Reporting in India: Exploring Sectoral Differences and Linkages with Financial Performance , 2017 .
[39] Sven Dahms. Determinants of foreign-owned subsidiary performance in emerging economies: Evidence from Taiwan , 2017 .
[40] Martin Glaum,et al. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure , 2017, Global Finance Journal.
[41] Christopher Marquis,et al. State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China , 2017, Management and Organization Review.
[42] I. García‐Sánchez,et al. Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports , 2017 .
[43] J. Vieito,et al. The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms , 2017 .
[44] Konari Uchida,et al. Institutional Investors, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Stock Price Performance , 2017 .
[45] Simon Cadez,et al. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: a review of measurement approaches , 2017 .
[46] Wojciech Przychodzeń,et al. Bridging the Gap: How Sustainable Development Can Help Companies Create Shareholder Value and Improve Financial Performance , 2017 .
[47] A. Murrell,et al. Revisiting the corporate social performance‐financial performance link: A replication of waddock and graves , 2016 .
[48] Junsheng Dou,et al. A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance , 2016 .
[49] Sonal S. Pandya. Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalized Production in the Twenty-First Century , 2016 .
[50] Mercedes Rodriguez-Fernandez,et al. Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Good Corporate Governance , 2016 .
[51] A. Scherer,et al. Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost , 2016 .
[52] G. Stahl,et al. Drivers of Global CSR Integration and Local CSR Responsiveness: Evidence from Chinese MNEs , 2016, Business Ethics Quarterly.
[53] Hsien-Kuei Chiu. Exploring the Factors Affecting Consumer Boycott Behavior in Taiwan: Food Oil Incidents and the Resulting Crisis of Brand Trust , 2016 .
[54] W. Mitchell,et al. Buffering and Enabling: The Impact of Interlocking Political Ties on Firm Survival and Sales Growth , 2015 .
[55] Michael Humphreys,et al. How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative , 2015 .
[56] Natalja Gurvitš,et al. Finding the Link between CSR Reporting and Corporate Finan-cial Performance: Evidence on Czech and Estonian Listed Com-panies , 2015 .
[57] Yadong Luo,et al. Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms , 2015 .
[58] P. Jain,et al. Sustainability Reporting Trend in Indian Companies as per GRI Framework: A Comparative Study , 2015 .
[59] Wei Huang,et al. Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: Evidence of a Split-Share Structure Reform in China , 2015 .
[60] Frederic Marimon,et al. A Closer Look at the ‘Global Reporting Initiative’ Sustainability Reporting as a Tool to Implement Environmental and Social Policies: A Worldwide Sector Analysis , 2014 .
[61] Hsin-Hong Kang,et al. Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: a quantile regression approach , 2013, Quality & Quantity.
[62] Don Bredin,et al. Domestic and foreign institutional investors’ behavior in China , 2014, The Chinese Capital Markets.
[63] H. Triandis,et al. Universal truths: can universally held cultural values inform the modern corporation? , 2014 .
[64] L. Renneboog,et al. Socially Responsible Firms , 2014 .
[65] I. García‐Sánchez,et al. Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors , 2014 .
[66] Issam c.,et al. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,... , 2014 .
[67] I. Filatotchev,et al. Corporate Governance, Responsible Managerial Behavior, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Organizational Efficiency Versus Organizational Legitimacy? , 2014 .
[68] Kiyoung Chang,et al. The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders , 2013, Journal of Business Ethics.
[69] Encarna Guillamón-Saorín,et al. Do Non-socially Responsible Companies Achieve Legitimacy Through Socially Responsible Actions? The Mediating Effect of Innovation , 2013 .
[70] M. García-Benau,et al. Financial crisis impact on sustainability reporting , 2013 .
[71] Yaping Wang,et al. Firm Performance, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in China , 2013 .
[72] Justin Tan,et al. From Voids to Sophistication: Institutional Environment and MNC CSR Crisis in Emerging Markets , 2013 .
[73] W. Sul,et al. Foreign board membership and firm value in Korea , 2012 .
[74] S. Hilger,et al. Ownership concentration beyond good and evil: is there an effect on corporate performance? , 2012 .
[75] I. Ioannou,et al. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions , 2012, Journal of International Business Studies.
[76] Judith Schrempf. The Delimitation of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2012 .
[77] M. Muttakin,et al. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.
[78] Chung-Fah Huang,et al. An empirical analysis of the influences of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance of Taiwan’s construction industry: using corporate image as a mediator , 2012 .
[79] H. Jo,et al. The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility , 2012 .
[80] A. Scherer,et al. Democratizing Corporate Governance , 2011 .
[81] Christopher Marquis,et al. Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance? , 2011, Organ. Sci..
[82] Aleksey Martynov,et al. The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea , 2011 .
[83] Chun Qiu,et al. Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Behaviors, and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China , 2011 .
[84] J. P. Sánchez-Ballesta,et al. The Association of Board Independence and Ownership Concentration with Voluntary Disclosure: A Meta-analysis , 2010 .
[85] Miguel A. Ferreira,et al. Does Governance Travel Around the World? Evidence from Institutional Investors , 2010 .
[86] S. Waddock,et al. Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources , 2010 .
[87] Paul A. Gompers,et al. Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States , 2010 .
[88] M. Canela,et al. Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity , 2010 .
[89] M. Graham,et al. On institutional ownership and firm performance: A disaggregated view , 2009 .
[90] N. Rajagopalan,et al. Recurring failures in corporate governance: A global disease? , 2009 .
[91] Kamel Mellahi,et al. A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai , 2009 .
[92] Scott J. Callan,et al. Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation , 2009 .
[93] F. Perrini,et al. Does Ownership Structure Affect Performance? Evidence from the Italian Market , 2008 .
[94] Miguel A. Ferreira,et al. The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world , 2008 .
[95] Kai Li,et al. Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter? , 2007 .
[96] H. Pao. Ownership and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Taiwan , 2007 .
[97] John L. Campbell. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .
[98] Z. Matolcsy,et al. The Association between Board Composition and Different Types of Voluntary Disclosure , 2007 .
[99] Richard C. Hoffman. Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: an institutional perspective , 2007 .
[100] Cheng-Chen Lin,et al. Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries , 2006, Journal of International Business Studies.
[101] B. Husted,et al. Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance* , 2006 .
[102] D. Siegel,et al. An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .
[103] W. Chapple,et al. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia , 2005 .
[104] Terence Cooke,et al. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting , 2005 .
[105] P. Groenewegen,et al. A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance , 2005 .
[106] J. Piesse,et al. Corporate Governance and Performance in Publicly Listed, Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Taiwan , 2005 .
[107] L. Starks,et al. Active Institutional Shareholders and Costs of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation , 2005 .
[108] Lukas Menkhoff,et al. Are Foreign Institutional Investors Good for Emerging Markets? , 2004 .
[109] J. D. Margolis,et al. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .
[110] Magnus Dahlquist,et al. Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics , 2001 .
[111] Shawn L. Berman,et al. A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .
[112] M. Joshi,et al. Institutional Investor Heterogeneity: Implications for Strategic Decisions , 1998 .
[113] J. Mahon,et al. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .
[114] Stephen W. Pruitt,et al. A Simple Approximation of Tobin's Q , 1994 .
[115] E. Fama,et al. The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns , 1992 .
[116] Arieh A. Ullmann. Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .
[117] H. White. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .
[118] John W. Meyer,et al. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.
[119] Sami Gharbi,et al. Which institutional investors encourage R&D investments , 2022, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development.
[120] Robyn L. Raschke,et al. Innovative sustainability and stakeholders’ shared understanding: The secret sauce to “performance with a purpose” , 2020 .
[121] Mark Fedenia,et al. Portfolio Concentration and Performance of Institutional Investors Worldwide , 2017 .
[122] Heli Wang,et al. Too Little or Too Much? Untangling the Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[123] Xiaodong Xu,et al. FIRM PERFORMANCE AND THE OWNERSHIP OF THE LARGEST SHAREHOLDER , 2007 .
[124] G. Bruton,et al. Navigating China's changing economy: Strategies for private firms , 2000 .
[125] Parthiban David,et al. Institutional investors and firm innovation : a test of competing hypotheses , 1996 .
[126] Bernard Black. Agents Watching Agents: The Promise of Institutional Investor Voice , 1992 .
[127] James A. Brickley,et al. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments , 1988 .