The cost of foreign ownership: Voluntary sustainability reporting and financial performance in an emerging economy

PurposeMany emerging economy firms are under foreign owners' pressure to embrace the challenges of addressing corporate social responsibility (CSR) and consider adopting sustainability initiatives. However, it is not clear how foreign ownership plays a role to enable or inhibit these emerging economy firms from translating sustainability initiatives into improved financial performance. Utilizing neo-institutional theory, the authors argue that emerging economy firms that voluntarily report sustainability gain legitimacy in the eyes of shareholders and improve stock market performance. However, emerging economy firms may not have the resources to reconcile the internal stakeholders' various legitimacy requirements to promote sustainability practices, resulting in a negative association with accounting performance. Foreign ownership attenuates the relationship between sustainability reporting and firm performance due to the different legitimacy requirements in foreign markets.Design/methodology/approachTo test the study’s hypotheses, the authors collected and analyzed a large sample of publicly listed firms between 2010 and 2016 in Taiwan where the types of foreign ownership include foreign trust funds, foreign financial institutions and other foreign legal entities. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate whether the firms that report their sustainable practices have better financial performance, including stock market performance and accounting performance. Additionally, a three-step procedure was employed to address the endogeneity issue with a binary explanatory variable.FindingsThe positive stock market reaction to the emerging economy firms' voluntary sustainability reporting supports legitimacy gained among investors. By contrast, sustainability reporting has a negative association with accounting performance due to the difficulty of reconciling different legitimacy requirements among various stakeholders in emerging economies. Further, foreign ownership, particularly the trust fund, exhibits a negative moderating effect on the relationship between sustainability reporting in aligning corporate practices with sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the company's stock market performance.Originality/valueBy examining the less tested contingent role played by foreign ownership in the emerging economy firms' sustainability reporting, the authors provide insights into the influence exerted by different types of foreign ownership on firms' financial performances beyond previous studies that focus on family ownership, state ownership, or managerial ownership in emerging economies. The findings shed light on corporate sustainability strategy and foreign direct investment policies for an emerging economy.

[1]  Mina Glambosky,et al.  Stock market response to the statement on the purpose of a corporation: A vindication of stakeholder theory , 2023, Corporate Governance: An International Review.

[2]  Samuel Tang,et al.  Do Not Forget the “How” along with the “What”: Improving the Transparency of Sustainability Reports , 2022, California Management Review.

[3]  Emmanuel Adegbite,et al.  Transfer of corporate governance practices into weak emerging market environments by foreign institutional investors , 2022, International Business Review.

[4]  Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz,et al.  Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets , 2022, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.

[5]  J. Gupta,et al.  Multidimensional corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance: A meta‐analytical review , 2022, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[6]  S. F. Khatib,et al.  Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: the case of Jordan , 2021, SN Business & Economics.

[7]  Ricardo Malagueño,et al.  An empirical study of sustainability reporting assurance: current trends and new insights , 2021, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.

[8]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Foreign ownership and corporate excess perks , 2021, Journal of International Business Studies.

[9]  F. W. Agbola,et al.  Does Corporate Social Responsibility Enhance Financial Performance? Evidence from Australia , 2021, Australian Accounting Review.

[10]  A. Gil-Lacruz,et al.  Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021 , 2021, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[11]  Nai H. Lamb,et al.  Cultural imprints: Emerging market multinationals’ post-acquisition corporate social performance , 2021 .

[12]  T. Mallikarjunappa,et al.  CSR expenditure, mandatory CSR reporting and financial performance of listed firms in India: an institutional theory perspective , 2020, Meditari Accountancy Research.

[13]  D. Jamali,et al.  Corporate Governance Meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Interface , 2020, Business & Society.

[14]  Rekha Rao‐Nicholson,et al.  Multinational enterprises and Sustainable Development Goals: A foreign subsidiary perspective on tackling wicked problems , 2020, Journal of International Business Policy.

[15]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods , 2020, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[16]  Cristina Gaio,et al.  Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting , 2020 .

[17]  Samuel Tang,et al.  On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[18]  Melsa Ararat,et al.  Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: A Selective Review and an Agenda for Future Research , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  Moustafa Salman Haj Youssef,et al.  The more you value, the less you practice: a study on culture and managerial discretion , 2019 .

[20]  C. Lau The economic consequences of business sustainability initiatives , 2019, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[21]  J. Aguilera-Caracuel,et al.  Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack , 2019, Journal of Business Ethics.

[22]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  Female directors and impression management in sustainability reporting , 2019, International Business Review.

[23]  Lujie Chen,et al.  Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China , 2019, Business & Society.

[24]  Aziz Jaafar,et al.  Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan , 2019, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

[25]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey , 2019, International Business Review.

[26]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  Ownership influences on corporate social responsibility in the Indian context , 2018 .

[27]  Haizhi Wang,et al.  Learning Chinese? The Changing Investment Behavior of Foreign Institutions in the Chinese Stock Market , 2018, International Review of Financial Analysis.

[28]  T. Kostova,et al.  Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals , 2018, Journal of International Business Studies.

[29]  B. Head Forty years of wicked problems literature: forging closer links to policy studies , 2018, Policy and Society.

[30]  Archana Singh,et al.  Institutional ownership and firm performance: evidence from Indian panel data , 2018 .

[31]  Sascha Raithel,et al.  Corporate Social Performance, Firm Size, and Organizational Visibility: Distinct and Joint Effects on Voluntary Sustainability Reporting , 2018 .

[32]  Nai H. Lamb,et al.  Buying to Be Socially Responsible: Emerging Market Multinational Corporations' Cross-Border Acquisitions and Corporate Social Performance , 2018 .

[33]  Valérie Moatti,et al.  “Teaching the Sushi Chef”: Hybridization Work and CSR Integration in a Japanese Multinational Company , 2018 .

[34]  C. Witte,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: The contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Development Goals , 2017 .

[35]  Karl V. Lins,et al.  Do Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? International Evidence , 2017, Journal of Financial Economics.

[36]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  Mitigating information asymmetry through sustainability assurance: The role of accountants and levels of assurance , 2017 .

[37]  G. Hendriks The Sustainable Development Effects of Investment by Emerging Market Multinationals: Shaping Beneficial Outcomes for Home and Host Country , 2017 .

[38]  Rupali Misra,et al.  Sustainability Reporting in India: Exploring Sectoral Differences and Linkages with Financial Performance , 2017 .

[39]  Sven Dahms Determinants of foreign-owned subsidiary performance in emerging economies: Evidence from Taiwan , 2017 .

[40]  Martin Glaum,et al.  ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure , 2017, Global Finance Journal.

[41]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China , 2017, Management and Organization Review.

[42]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports , 2017 .

[43]  J. Vieito,et al.  The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms , 2017 .

[44]  Konari Uchida,et al.  Institutional Investors, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Stock Price Performance , 2017 .

[45]  Simon Cadez,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: a review of measurement approaches , 2017 .

[46]  Wojciech Przychodzeń,et al.  Bridging the Gap: How Sustainable Development Can Help Companies Create Shareholder Value and Improve Financial Performance , 2017 .

[47]  A. Murrell,et al.  Revisiting the corporate social performance‐financial performance link: A replication of waddock and graves , 2016 .

[48]  Junsheng Dou,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance , 2016 .

[49]  Sonal S. Pandya Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalized Production in the Twenty-First Century , 2016 .

[50]  Mercedes Rodriguez-Fernandez,et al.  Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Good Corporate Governance , 2016 .

[51]  A. Scherer,et al.  Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost , 2016 .

[52]  G. Stahl,et al.  Drivers of Global CSR Integration and Local CSR Responsiveness: Evidence from Chinese MNEs , 2016, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[53]  Hsien-Kuei Chiu Exploring the Factors Affecting Consumer Boycott Behavior in Taiwan: Food Oil Incidents and the Resulting Crisis of Brand Trust , 2016 .

[54]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Buffering and Enabling: The Impact of Interlocking Political Ties on Firm Survival and Sales Growth , 2015 .

[55]  Michael Humphreys,et al.  How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative , 2015 .

[56]  Natalja Gurvitš,et al.  Finding the Link between CSR Reporting and Corporate Finan-cial Performance: Evidence on Czech and Estonian Listed Com-panies , 2015 .

[57]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms , 2015 .

[58]  P. Jain,et al.  Sustainability Reporting Trend in Indian Companies as per GRI Framework: A Comparative Study , 2015 .

[59]  Wei Huang,et al.  Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: Evidence of a Split-Share Structure Reform in China , 2015 .

[60]  Frederic Marimon,et al.  A Closer Look at the ‘Global Reporting Initiative’ Sustainability Reporting as a Tool to Implement Environmental and Social Policies: A Worldwide Sector Analysis , 2014 .

[61]  Hsin-Hong Kang,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: a quantile regression approach , 2013, Quality & Quantity.

[62]  Don Bredin,et al.  Domestic and foreign institutional investors’ behavior in China , 2014, The Chinese Capital Markets.

[63]  H. Triandis,et al.  Universal truths: can universally held cultural values inform the modern corporation? , 2014 .

[64]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Socially Responsible Firms , 2014 .

[65]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors , 2014 .

[66]  Issam c.,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,... , 2014 .

[67]  I. Filatotchev,et al.  Corporate Governance, Responsible Managerial Behavior, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Organizational Efficiency Versus Organizational Legitimacy? , 2014 .

[68]  Kiyoung Chang,et al.  The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders , 2013, Journal of Business Ethics.

[69]  Encarna Guillamón-Saorín,et al.  Do Non-socially Responsible Companies Achieve Legitimacy Through Socially Responsible Actions? The Mediating Effect of Innovation , 2013 .

[70]  M. García-Benau,et al.  Financial crisis impact on sustainability reporting , 2013 .

[71]  Yaping Wang,et al.  Firm Performance, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in China , 2013 .

[72]  Justin Tan,et al.  From Voids to Sophistication: Institutional Environment and MNC CSR Crisis in Emerging Markets , 2013 .

[73]  W. Sul,et al.  Foreign board membership and firm value in Korea , 2012 .

[74]  S. Hilger,et al.  Ownership concentration beyond good and evil: is there an effect on corporate performance? , 2012 .

[75]  I. Ioannou,et al.  What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions , 2012, Journal of International Business Studies.

[76]  Judith Schrempf The Delimitation of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2012 .

[77]  M. Muttakin,et al.  Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[78]  Chung-Fah Huang,et al.  An empirical analysis of the influences of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance of Taiwan’s construction industry: using corporate image as a mediator , 2012 .

[79]  H. Jo,et al.  The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility , 2012 .

[80]  A. Scherer,et al.  Democratizing Corporate Governance , 2011 .

[81]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance? , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[82]  Aleksey Martynov,et al.  The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea , 2011 .

[83]  Chun Qiu,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Behaviors, and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China , 2011 .

[84]  J. P. Sánchez-Ballesta,et al.  The Association of Board Independence and Ownership Concentration with Voluntary Disclosure: A Meta-analysis , 2010 .

[85]  Miguel A. Ferreira,et al.  Does Governance Travel Around the World? Evidence from Institutional Investors , 2010 .

[86]  S. Waddock,et al.  Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources , 2010 .

[87]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States , 2010 .

[88]  M. Canela,et al.  Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity , 2010 .

[89]  M. Graham,et al.  On institutional ownership and firm performance: A disaggregated view , 2009 .

[90]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  Recurring failures in corporate governance: A global disease? , 2009 .

[91]  Kamel Mellahi,et al.  A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai , 2009 .

[92]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation , 2009 .

[93]  F. Perrini,et al.  Does Ownership Structure Affect Performance? Evidence from the Italian Market , 2008 .

[94]  Miguel A. Ferreira,et al.  The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world , 2008 .

[95]  Kai Li,et al.  Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter? , 2007 .

[96]  H. Pao Ownership and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Taiwan , 2007 .

[97]  John L. Campbell Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[98]  Z. Matolcsy,et al.  The Association between Board Composition and Different Types of Voluntary Disclosure , 2007 .

[99]  Richard C. Hoffman Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: an institutional perspective , 2007 .

[100]  Cheng-Chen Lin,et al.  Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries , 2006, Journal of International Business Studies.

[101]  B. Husted,et al.  Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance* , 2006 .

[102]  D. Siegel,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[103]  W. Chapple,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia , 2005 .

[104]  Terence Cooke,et al.  The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting , 2005 .

[105]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance , 2005 .

[106]  J. Piesse,et al.  Corporate Governance and Performance in Publicly Listed, Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Taiwan , 2005 .

[107]  L. Starks,et al.  Active Institutional Shareholders and Costs of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation , 2005 .

[108]  Lukas Menkhoff,et al.  Are Foreign Institutional Investors Good for Emerging Markets? , 2004 .

[109]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[110]  Magnus Dahlquist,et al.  Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics , 2001 .

[111]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[112]  M. Joshi,et al.  Institutional Investor Heterogeneity: Implications for Strategic Decisions , 1998 .

[113]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[114]  Stephen W. Pruitt,et al.  A Simple Approximation of Tobin's Q , 1994 .

[115]  E. Fama,et al.  The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns , 1992 .

[116]  Arieh A. Ullmann Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[117]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[118]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[119]  Sami Gharbi,et al.  Which institutional investors encourage R&D investments , 2022, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development.

[120]  Robyn L. Raschke,et al.  Innovative sustainability and stakeholders’ shared understanding: The secret sauce to “performance with a purpose” , 2020 .

[121]  Mark Fedenia,et al.  Portfolio Concentration and Performance of Institutional Investors Worldwide , 2017 .

[122]  Heli Wang,et al.  Too Little or Too Much? Untangling the Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[123]  Xiaodong Xu,et al.  FIRM PERFORMANCE AND THE OWNERSHIP OF THE LARGEST SHAREHOLDER , 2007 .

[124]  G. Bruton,et al.  Navigating China's changing economy: Strategies for private firms , 2000 .

[125]  Parthiban David,et al.  Institutional investors and firm innovation : a test of competing hypotheses , 1996 .

[126]  Bernard Black Agents Watching Agents: The Promise of Institutional Investor Voice , 1992 .

[127]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments , 1988 .