Physiology of Mungbean and Development of the Mungbean Crop Model

Stepwise yield improvements in mungbean since the first introduction of varieties such as Emerald and White Gold have transformed the crop into an important summer legume and the main rotation option for dryland growers in northern Australia. Although the more recent release of Crystal has delivered increased yield and boosted growers’ confidence, the full potential of the crop has yet to be tapped. The crop usually produces <2 t/ha in environments where other legumes, including peanut and soybean, can produce up to 5 t/ha. Studies conducted in Australia have shown that the radiation and water use efficiencies of mungbean are similar to those of soybean and peanut, but the dry matter production potential and its partitioning into yield are relatively low. The understanding of pulse crop physiology, agronomy and genetics developed over the last four decades in Australia and elsewhere must now be integrated with current mungbean breeding programs to achieve further yield increases. It is necessary to identify other traits/mechanisms that could lead to increased dry matter production and its partitioning, and to incorporate them into suitable backgrounds through breeding as has been achieved in some other legumes. This would require improved understanding of the process of yield formation in the crop. The current physiological knowledge of the crop has been well incorporated into the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) mungbean model, but the model requires further improvement. This paper evaluates the scope for mungbean improvement using a trait based approach, and discusses potential applications of APSIM for improving crop adaptation in different environments.

[1]  J. Poehlman,et al.  Inheritance of photoperiod response in mungbean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek) , 1978, Euphytica.

[2]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Accumulation and partitioning of biomass and nitrogen by soybean, mungbean and cowpea under contrasting environmental conditions , 1993 .

[3]  Holger Meinke,et al.  A Peanut Simulation Model: II. Assessing Regional Production Potential , 1995 .

[4]  M. Robertson,et al.  The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth, development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean , 2004 .

[5]  J. Sahu,et al.  Harvest index in relation to yield of grain legumes. , 1980 .

[6]  I. DeLacy,et al.  Analysis of genotypic and environmental variation in international mungbean trials , 1981, Euphytica.

[7]  R. C. Muchow Canopy development in grain legumes grown under different soil water regimes in a semi-arid tropical environment , 1985 .

[8]  R M Gifford,et al.  Crop Productivity and Photoassimilate Partitioning , 1984, Science.

[9]  M. J. Robertson,et al.  Evaluation of a new cropping option using a participatory approach with on-farm monitoring and simulation: a case study of spring-sown mungbeans , 2000 .

[10]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. , 2000 .

[11]  K. Hariprasanna,et al.  Gene action for surrogate traits of water-use efficiency and harvest index in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) , 2006 .

[12]  E. H. Roberts,et al.  Towards the Reliable Prediction of Time to Flowering in Six Annual Crops. IV. Cultivated and Wild Mung Bean , 1994, Experimental Agriculture.

[13]  Suk-Ha Lee,et al.  Photoperiod Responses of Extra‐Short‐Duration Pigeonpea Lines Developed at Different Latitudes , 2002 .

[14]  R. C. Muchow An analysis of the effects of water deficits on grain legumes grown in a semi-arid tropical environment in terms of radiation interception and its efficiency of use , 1985 .

[15]  R. Lawn Agronomic and Physiological Constraints to the Productivity of Tropical Grain Legumes and Prospects for Improvement , 1989, Experimental Agriculture.

[16]  R. Hay,et al.  Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology , 1995 .

[17]  N. Huth,et al.  Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM , 2002 .

[18]  C. Bonsi,et al.  Continuous Daily Light Period and Temperature Influence Peanut Yield in Nutrient Film Technique , 1999 .

[19]  K. Boote,et al.  Physiological Aspects of Peanut Yield Improvement 1 , 1978 .

[20]  G. Rebetzke,et al.  Adaptive responses of wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) to photo-thermal environment. II. ∗ Growth, biomass, and seed yield , 2006 .

[21]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Estimates of relative contribution of biomass, harvest index and yield components to soybean yield improvements in China , 2005 .