Resilience as a means to analyze business processes on the structure of vulnerability

The impact of global societal trends regarding product reliability provides society with great benefits and yet comes with the consequence of increased organizational vulnerability. The goal of this research was to examine these issues and develop the means for organizations to mitigate the potential negative effects of disturbances from within and external to the organization for the purpose of sustaining organizational resilience. As a result of this research the Highly Reliable Resilient Organization (HRRO) methodology was developed to provide a consistent and customizable methodology to assess organizational vulnerability. The purpose of this methodology is to determine current and potential levels of vulnerability and to select and prioritize vulnerability elimination and mitigation initiatives and projects using pre-established monetary and non-monetary factors. Moreover, the HRRO methodology provides the means to identify, define, and assess the prerequisite criteria of an organization that enable it to be resilient. These prerequisite criteria are the foundation for the organization’s core function; its culture, its ability to manage risk, and its governing processes, i.e. its ability to be resilient, or at the very least available to fulfill monetary and non-monetary goals and enjoy a better chance for sustained viability. The HRRO methodology is a generalizable analytic-deliberative process that was validated by stakeholders, nine well known organizational models, a prioritization methodology that has been in use for several years, independent case studies, and an independent and widely used location risk quality benchmarking algorithm. To foster sustained use, the HRRO methodology strikes a balance between complexity and simplicity, i.e. the model is sufficiently comprehensive to reflect reality and sufficiently simple to be manageable. The methodology used in this dissertation is based upon transformative-reflective design processes. The first step in this process was, in this case, the creation of a construct that was analyzed, validated and adapted during subsequent steps.

[1]  George E Apostolakis,et al.  A Screening Methodology for the Identification and Ranking of Infrastructure Vulnerabilities Due to Terrorism , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[3]  Michael X Cohen Leadership and ambiguity: the American college president, , 1974 .

[4]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[5]  D. M. Clarke Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty (2nd edn) Karl E Weick and Kathleen M Sutcliffe (2007) Wiley & Sons, San Francisco; ISBN 978-0-7879-9649-9; HC; 194 pages; USD 27.05 , 2008, Journal of Management & Organization.

[6]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[7]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[9]  S. Anand Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework , 2012 .

[10]  Stanley S. Grossel,et al.  Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, AIChE Center for Chemical Process Safety. Wiley-AIChE, New York (2007), 768pp., $150.00, ISBN: 978-0-470-16569-0 , 2008 .

[11]  Vikas Singh,et al.  National Incident Management System , 2007 .

[12]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[13]  Matteo Tonello Emerging Governance Practices in Enterprise Risk Management , 2007 .

[14]  H. Arkes,et al.  Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. , 1981, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Edward M. Roche,et al.  Critical Foundations: Protecting America's Infrastructures , 1998 .

[17]  D. M. Karydas,et al.  Organizational attributes of Highly Reliable complex systems , 2010, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[19]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Developing utility functions for environmental decision making , 1999 .

[20]  Stanley N. Salthe,et al.  Understanding Complexity , 2001, Springer US.

[21]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SAFETY , 2005 .

[22]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[24]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[25]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Terrorist Threats: A Systems Analysis Approach to Setting Priorities Among Countermeasures , 2002 .

[26]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[27]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[28]  A M Hayashi,et al.  When to trust your gut. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[29]  เถลิงศก โสมทิพย์ THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization , 2012 .

[30]  C Leake,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgement (2nd Edn) , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[31]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Product Reliability: Specification and Performance , 2008 .

[32]  Hayashi Am,et al.  When to trust your gut. , 2001 .

[33]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety , 1990 .

[34]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  P. Kline,et al.  Ten Steps to a Learning Organization , 1993 .

[36]  Wolfgang Christian,et al.  Dynamics of Complex Systems (Studies in Nonlinearity) , 1998 .

[37]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[38]  David Barber,et al.  Ranking the Risks from Multiple Hazards in a Small Community , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  A methodology for the prioritization of operating experience in nuclear power plants , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  D. M. Karydas,et al.  A method for the efficient prioritization of infrastructure renewal projects , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  On the Definition of Resilience in Systems , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  J. Cheetham Winning hearts and minds. , 1995, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[43]  J. Shaoul Human Error , 1973, Nature.