CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis: Mind the Gap?

References 1. Mathews DJ, Chan S, Donovan PJ, et al. CRISPR: a path through the thicket. Nature 2015;527:159–161. DOI: 10.1038/527159a. 2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2017. 3. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome Editing and Human Reproduction: Social and Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2018. 4. Brokowski C. Do CRISPR germline ethics statements cut it? CRISPR J 2018;1:115–125. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2017.0024. 5. OECD. Inequality. Available online at www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm (accessed July 26, 2018). 6. Burall S. Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Nature 2018;555:438–439. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-03269-3. 7. Hurlbut JB, Jasanoff S, Saha K, et al. Building capacity for a global genome editing observatory: conceptual challenges. Trends Biotech 2018;36: 639–641. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.009. 8. Montoliu L, Merchant J, Hirsch F, et al. ARRIGE arrives: toward the responsible use of genome editing. CRISPR J 2018;1:128–130. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2018.29012.mon.