A Gas-Powered, Patient-Responsive Automatic Resuscitator for Use in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Bench and Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a need for innovative, inexpensive, and simple ventilator devices for mass use has emerged. The Oxylator (CPR Medical Devices, Markham, Ontario, Canada) is an FDA-approved, fist-size, portable ventilation device developed for out-of-hospital emergency ventilation. It has not been tested in conditions of severe lung injury or with added PEEP. We aimed to assess the performance and reliability of the device in simulated and experimental conditions of severe lung injury, and to derive monitoring methods to allow the delivery of safe, individualized ventilation during situations of surge. METHODS: We bench-tested the functioning of the device with an added PEEP valve extensively, mimicking adult patients with various respiratory mechanics during controlled ventilation, spontaneous breathing, and prolonged unstable conditions where mechanics or breathing effort was changed at every breath. The device was further tested on a porcine model (4 animals) after inducing lung injury, and these results were compared with conventional ventilation modes. RESULTS: The device was stable and predictable, delivering a constant flow (30 L/min) and cycling automatically at the inspiratory pressure set (minimum of 20 cm H2O) above auto-PEEP. Changes in respiratory mechanics manifested as changes in respiratory timing, allowing prediction of tidal volumes from breathing frequency. Simulating lung injury resulted in relatively low tidal volumes (330 mL with compliance of 20 mL/cm H2O). In the porcine model, arterial oxygenation, CO2, and pH were comparable to conventional modes of ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: The Oxylator is a simple device that delivered stable ventilation with tidal volumes within a clinically acceptable range in bench and porcine lung models with low compliance. External monitoring of respiratory timing is advisable, allowing tidal volume estimation and recognition of changes in respiratory mechanics. The device can be an efficient, low-cost, and practical rescue solution for providing short-term ventilatory support as a temporary bridge, but it requires a caregiver at the bedside.

[1]  Patrick Lévy,et al.  Easier access to mechanical ventilation worldwide: an urgent need for low income countries, especially in face of the growing COVID-19 crisis , 2020, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Personalized Ventilation to Multiple Patients Using a Single Ventilator: Description and Proof of Concept , 2020, Critical care explorations.

[3]  Xiao-Neng Mo,et al.  Respiratory Pathophysiology of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19: A Cohort Study , 2020, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  G. Grasselli,et al.  Potential for Lung Recruitment and Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch in Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome From Coronavirus Disease 2019* , 2020, Critical care medicine.

[5]  Ramon Farré,et al.  Low-cost, easy-to-build noninvasive pressure support ventilator for under-resourced regions: open source hardware description, performance and feasibility testing , 2020, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  T. J. Byrne,et al.  Coping with COVID‐19: ventilator splitting with differential driving pressures using standard hospital equipment , 2020, Anaesthesia.

[7]  Megan L Ranney,et al.  Critical Supply Shortages - The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Ezekiel J Emanuel,et al.  Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Robert D Truog,et al.  The Toughest Triage - Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Giacomo Grasselli,et al.  Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response. , 2020, JAMA.

[11]  G. Schneider,et al.  Continuous chest compressions with a simultaneous triggered ventilator in the Munich Emergency Medical Services: a case series , 2019, German medical science : GMS e-journal.

[12]  M. Post,et al.  Continuous Negative Abdominal Pressure Reduces Ventilator-induced Lung Injury in a Porcine Model , 2018, Anesthesiology.

[13]  P. Dorian,et al.  The effects of an automatic, low pressure and constant flow ventilation device versus manual ventilation during cardiovascular resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[14]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome The Berlin Definition , 2012 .

[15]  Erwan L'Her,et al.  Bench Tests of Simple, Handy Ventilators for Pandemics: Performance, Autonomy, and Ergonomy , 2011, Respiratory Care.

[16]  Inéz Frerichs,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2010 .

[17]  A. Noordergraaf,et al.  Can first responders achieve and maintain normocapnia when sequentially ventilating with a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators? A controlled clinical trial in 104 patients , 2004, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[18]  J. Marini,et al.  Flow resistance of exhalation valves and positive end-expiratory pressure devices used in mechanical ventilation. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.