Argumentation Across the Curriculum

This study explores how different kinds of arguments are situated in academic contexts and provides an analysis of undergraduate writing assignments. Assignments were collected from the schools of business, education, engineering, fine arts, and interdisciplinary studies as well as the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences in the College of Arts and Science. A total of 265 undergraduate writing assignments from 71 courses were analyzed. Assignments were reliably categorized into these major categories of argumentative writing: explicitly thesis-driven assignments, text analysis, empirical arguments, decision-based arguments, proposals, short answer arguments, and compound arguments. A majority of writing assignments (59%) required argumentation. All engineering writing assignments required argumentation, as did 90% in fine arts, 80% of interdisciplinary assignments, 72% of social science assignments, 60% of education assignments, 53% in natural science, 47% in the humanities, and 46% in business. Argumentation is valued across the curriculum, yet different academic contexts require different forms of argumentation.

[1]  Richard Andrews,et al.  Argumentation in Higher Education: Improving Practice Through Theory and Research , 2009 .

[2]  Grady Venville,et al.  High‐school Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? , 2009 .

[3]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. , 1999 .

[4]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[5]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Measuring Argumentative Reasoning: What's behind the Numbers?. , 2009 .

[6]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  On the processing of arguments , 1993 .

[7]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Evaluation of Informal Arguments , 2009, Journal of experimental education.

[8]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentative Activity , 2003 .

[9]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Historical Reasoning: Towards a Framework for Analyzing Students’ Reasoning about the Past , 2008 .

[10]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? , 2008 .

[11]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Developing understanding while writing essays in history , 1997 .

[12]  Bo Brinkman,et al.  Using Rationale to Assist Student Cognitive and Intellectual Development , 2010 .

[13]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Constructing representations of arguments , 2003 .

[14]  Yiannis Gabriel.  Against the Tyranny of PowerPoint: Technology-in-Use and Technology Abuse , 2008 .

[15]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[16]  Christopher R. Wolfe,et al.  Assessing Interdisciplinary Writing , 2003 .

[17]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Collaborative argumentation in academic education , 2002 .

[18]  William C. Regli,et al.  A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[19]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation , 2009 .

[20]  Jeanne Fahnestock,et al.  The Stases in Scientific and Literary Argument , 1988 .

[21]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Supporting Systems Development by Capturing Deliberations During Requirements Engineering , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[22]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[23]  Christopher R. Wolfe,et al.  INTERDISCIPLINARY WRITING ASSESSMENT PROFILES by , 2003 .

[24]  J. F. Voss.  Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems , 2005 .

[25]  Carolyn Haynes,et al.  Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing , 2009 .

[26]  Laura Wilder.  “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism” Revisited , 2005 .

[27]  A. Lischinsky.  Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature , 2008 .

[28]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation , 2008 .

[29]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  I Agreed with What? Memory for Simple Argument Claims , 2007 .

[30]  Aristotle,et al.  On rhetoric : a theory of civic discourse , 1993 .