In previous work by the senior authors, brief adaptation to glasses that changed the accommodation and convergence with which objects were seen resulted in large alterations in size perception. Here, two further effects of such adaptation are reported: alterations in stereoscopic depth perception and a change when distance is represented by a response of S’s arm. We believe that the three effects are manifestations of one primary effect, an alteration of the relation between accommodation and convergence on the one hand and the distance they represent in the nervous system (registered distance) on the other. This view was supported by the results of two experiments, each of which demonstrated that the alterations in stereoscopic depth perception could be obtained after adaptation periods which had provided no opportunity to use stereoscopic vision, and that the adaptation effect was larger for depth perception than for size perception when it was obtained under the same conditions; the latter finding was expected if both effects resulted from the same change in registered distance. In three of the five experiments here reported, the variety of cues that could represent veridical distance during the adaptation period was limited. In one condition of adaptation, only the pattern of growth of the retinal images of objects that S approached and the kinesthetic cues for S’s locomotion served as cues to veridical distance. In two other conditions S remained immobile. In one of these, only the perspective distortion in the projection of the scene that S viewed mediated veridical distance, and in the other one familiar objects of normal size were successively illuminated in an otherwise totally dark field, conditions from which opportunities to use stereoscopic vision were again absent. After exposure to each of these adaptation conditions, adaptive changes in perceived size and larger ones in perceived stereoscopic depth were obtained. Because we found that familiar size may serve as the sole indicator of veridical distance in an adaptation process, we concluded that it can function as a perceptual as distinguished from an inferential cue to distance.
[1]
H. Wallach,et al.
Adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues
,
1972
.
[2]
Hans Wallach,et al.
Differences in the dissipation of the effect of adaptation to two kinds of field displacement during head movements
,
1972
.
[3]
S. S. Stevens,et al.
Handbook of experimental psychology
,
1951
.
[4]
W C Gogel,et al.
The Effect of Object Familiarity on the Perception of Size and Distance
,
1969,
The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[5]
J M Foley,et al.
Binocular disparity and perceived relative distance: an examination of two hypotheses.
,
1967,
Vision research.
[6]
J. Gibson.
The perception of the visual world
,
1951
.
[7]
J. M. Foley.
Disparity increase with convergence for constant perceptual criteria
,
1967
.
[8]
H. Wallach,et al.
The constancy of stereoscopic depth.
,
1963,
The American journal of psychology.