Coexisting Agents: Experiments on Basic Interaction Attitude

This paper deals with the problem of coexistence in the same environment of agents with different fixed attitudes toward each other. Agents that are endowed with distinct 'help-seeking' and 'help-giving' strategies have been defined and simulated in a multi-agent system, and the effect of their behavior on the global performance of the system has been measured. The experimental environment can be considered a good metaphor for a task that needs no social coordination and must be performed autonomously by each agent but, at the same time, can be affected by the other agent's cooperative attitude and produces global effects on the system. In three sets of experiments we investigated different aspects: Study 1 shows the utility of the 'social' attitude (characterizing agents that both give and ask for help) with respect to the selfsufficient one; Study 2 shows how social agents are able to tolerate the presence of exploiters; Study 3 shows how the robustness of the social strategy is tested by putting help-giving under various risky conditions. The results reveal the general robustness of the social attitude and its usefulness for the whole system. The results also point to the varying degrees of dangerousness and robustness of different exploitation strategies, according to the different environmental conditions in which the exploiters are placed. Corresponding author: tel: +39-06-86090-209, fax: +39-06-824737 e-mail: cesta@ip.rm.cnr.it 'e-mail: miceli, paolag@ip.rm.cnr.it

[1]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Cristiano Castelfranchi Social Power: A Point missed in Multi-Agent , 1990 .

[3]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Variable Sociability in Agent-Based Decision Making , 1999, ATAL.

[4]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Socially Responsible Decision Making by Autonomous Agents , 1999 .

[5]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.

[6]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Dependence relations among autonomous agents (abstract) , 1992, SIGO.

[8]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Elephants don't play chess , 1990, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  B. Huberman,et al.  The outbreak of cooperation , 1993 .

[10]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Artificial Intelligence Modelling social action for AI agents , 2003 .

[11]  Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.  Foundations of learning in autonomous agents , 1991, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  Stuart J. Russell Rationality and Intelligence , 1995, IJCAI.

[13]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[14]  CouncilViale,et al.  Help Under Risky Conditions : Robustness of the Social Attitude and System Performance , 1996 .

[15]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Coordination of distributed problem solvers , 1988 .

[16]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Using MICE to study intelligent dynamic coordination , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence.

[17]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Effects of Different Interaction Attitudes on a Multi-Agent System Performance , 1996, MAAMAW.

[18]  L. Steels The Artificial Life Roots of Artificial Intelligence , 1993, Artificial Life.

[19]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein and Gilad Zlotkin Rules of Encounter , 1994 .

[20]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents , 1997, IEE Proc. Softw. Eng..