Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification.

Images acquired from an electronic portal imaging device are aligned with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) or other portal images to verify patient positioning during radiation therapy. Most of the currently available computer aided registration methods are based on the manual placement of corresponding landmarks. The purpose of the paper is twofold: (a) the establishment of a methodology for patient set-up verification during radiotherapy based on the registration of electronic portal images, and (b) the evaluation of the proposed methodology in a clinical environment. The estimation of set-up errors, using the proposed methodology, can be accomplished by matching the portal image of the current fraction of the treatment with the portal image of the baseline treatment (reference portal image) using a nearly automated technique. The proposed registration method is tested on a number of phantom data as well as on data from four patients. The phantom data included portal images that corresponded to various positions of the phantom on the treatment couch. For each patient, a set of 30 portal images was used. For the phantom data (for both transverse and lateral portal images), the maximum absolute deviations of the translational shifts were within 1.5 mm, whereas the in-plane rotation angle error was less than 0.5 degrees. The two-way Anova revealed no statistical significant variability both within observer and between-observer measurements (P > 0.05). For the patient data, the mean values obtained with manual and the proposed registration methods were within 0.5 mm. In conclusion, the proposed registration method has been incorporated within a system, called ESTERR-PRO. Its image registration capability achieves high accuracy and both intra- and inter-user reproducibility. The system is fully operational within the Radiotherapy Department of 'HYGEIA' Hospital in Athens and it could be easily installed in any other clinical environment since it requires standardized hardware specifications and minimal human intervention.

[1]  P. Remeijer,et al.  Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  A Boxwala,et al.  Core-based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A Boxwala,et al.  Benchmark test cases for evaluation of computer-based methods for detection of setup errors: realistic digitally reconstructed electronic portal images with known setup errors. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  J Bijhold,et al.  A method for the measurement of field placement errors in digital portal images. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  B G Fallone,et al.  Three-dimensional anatomy setup verification by correlation of orthogonal portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs. , 1999, Medical physics.

[6]  C Thomason,et al.  User introduced uncertainties in the measurement of field misalignment by a computer aided technique. , 1998, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  L Dong,et al.  A portal image alignment and patient setup verification procedure using moments and correlation techniques. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  John D. Austin,et al.  Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations , 1987 .

[9]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  D. Purdie Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn , 2003 .

[11]  M van Herk,et al.  3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A Zaccarin,et al.  Automatic setup deviation measurements with electronic portal images for pelvic fields. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  J Moseley,et al.  A semiautomatic method for registration of portal images. , 1994, Medical physics.

[14]  Gurdial Arora,et al.  A thresholding method based on two-dimensional Renyi's entropy , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  G T Chen,et al.  Correlation of projection radiographs in radiation therapy using open curve segments and points. , 1992, Medical physics.

[17]  Serge Miguet,et al.  Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  A L Boyer,et al.  An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Zhe Chen,et al.  A Novel Approach for the Registration of 2D Portal and 3D CT Images for Treatment Setup Verification in Radiotherapy , 1998, MICCAI.

[20]  L. Ingber Very fast simulated re-annealing , 1989 .

[21]  J C Stroom,et al.  On-line set-up corrections during radiotherapy of patients with gynecologic tumors. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  J M Balter,et al.  Determination of rotations in three dimensions using two-dimensional portal image registration. , 1998, Medical physics.

[23]  S Loose,et al.  Segmented chamfer matching for the registration of field borders in radiotherapy images. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Hierarchical Chamfer Matching: A Parametric Edge Matching Algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..