Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease

Objective: Assessment of disease extension and activity is crucial to guide treatment in Crohn’s disease. The objective of the current cross-sectional study was to determine the accuracy of MR for this assessment. Design: 50 patients with clinically active (n = 35) or inactive (n = 15) Crohn’s disease underwent ileocolonoscopy (reference standard) and MR. T2-weighted and precontrast and postcontrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were acquired. Endoscopic activity was evaluated by CDEIS (Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity); in addition endoscopic lesions were classified as absent, mild (inflammation without ulcers) or severe (presence of ulceration). Results: The comparison of intestinal segments with absent, mild and severe inflammation demonstrated a progressive and significant (p<0.001) increase in the following MR parameters: wall thickness, postcontrast wall signal intensity, relative contrast enhancement, presence of oedema, ulcers, pseudopolyps and lymph node enlargement. Independent predictors for CDEIS in a segment were wall thickness (p = 0.007), relative contrast enhancement (p = 0.01), presence of oedema (p = 0.02) and presence of ulcers at MR (p = 0.003). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.82, p<0.001) between the CDEIS of the segment and the MR index calculated according to the logistic regression analysis coefficients. The MR index had a high accuracy for the detection of disease activity (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0.891, sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.89) and for the detection of ulcerative lesions (area under the ROC curve 0.978, sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.91) in the colon and terminal ileum. Conclusion: The accuracy of MR for detecting disease activity and assessing severity brings about the possibility of using MR as an alternative to endoscopy in the evaluation of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease.

[1]  Province,et al.  Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the severity for Crohn's disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d'Etudes Thérapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). , 1989, Gut.

[2]  D. Franchimont,et al.  Crohn's Disease , 1976, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Debatin,et al.  Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity , 2005, Gut.

[4]  W. Fleig,et al.  Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis , 2005, Gut.

[5]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study , 2005, Gut.

[6]  R. F. Harvey,et al.  A SIMPLE INDEX OF CROHN'S-DISEASE ACTIVITY , 1980, The Lancet.

[7]  T. Matsui,et al.  Value of virtual computed tomographic colonography for Crohn’s colitis: comparison with endoscopy and barium enema , 2003, Abdominal Imaging.

[8]  D. Frush,et al.  Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's disease. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Eriksson,et al.  Patients with atherosclerosis may have increased circulating levels of 27‐hydroxycholesterol and cholestenoic acid , 2005, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[10]  R. Jian,et al.  Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn's disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[11]  J Y Mary,et al.  Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the severity for Crohn's disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d'Etudes Thérapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). , 1989, Gut.

[12]  R. Caprilli,et al.  MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. , 2006, Radiology.

[13]  L. Sandvik,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis , 2007, European Radiology.

[14]  R. Semelka,et al.  Bowel disease: Prospective comparison of CT and 1.5‐T pre‐ and postcontrast MR imaging with T1‐weighted fat‐suppressed and breath‐hold FLASH sequences , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  L. Martí-Bonmatí,et al.  Assessment of the extension and the inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease: comparison of ultrasound and MRI , 2009, Abdominal Imaging.

[16]  N. Gourtsoyiannis,et al.  Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  D. Koh,et al.  MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Bowel ultrasound in Crohn's disease. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology.

[20]  Gerald Holtmann,et al.  MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. , 2005, Radiology.

[21]  A. Aisen,et al.  Abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Joel Garland Fletcher,et al.  Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn’s disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein , 2006, Gut.

[24]  M. Sans,et al.  Optimization of Technetium-99m-HMPAO Leukocyte Scintigraphy in Evaluation of Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease , 2000, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[25]  M. Sans,et al.  Hydrocolonic sonography for evaluating inflammatory bowel disease. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[27]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Crohn Disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT Enterography--correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. , 2006, Radiology.

[28]  L. Ryner,et al.  A Prospective Comparison Study of MRI versus Small Bowel Follow-Through in Recurrent Crohn's Disease , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[29]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy--feasibility study. , 2003, Radiology.

[30]  G. Corazza,et al.  Prevalence and clinical significance of sonographic detection of enlarged regional lymph nodes in Crohn's disease. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[31]  I. Leodolter [Crohn's disease]. , 1967, Wiener Zeitschrift fur innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[32]  Yong Eun Chung,et al.  Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[33]  G. Ghahremani,et al.  CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  J. Brade,et al.  Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: A retrospective single-centre comparative study , 2008, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[35]  G. Gerken,et al.  Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study , 2004, European Radiology.

[36]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  D. Szolar,et al.  Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. , 2000, Radiology.

[38]  J. Barkhausen,et al.  MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: Diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance , 2007, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[39]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .