Attention capture is modulated in dual-task situations

Because some features affect the efficiency of visual search even when they are irrelevant to the task, they are thought tocapture attention in a stimulus-driven manner. If such attention shifts are stimulus driven, they should be unaffected by reduced resources. We added a concurrent auditory task to a traditional attention capture paradigm and found that capture by an irrelevant, abruptly appearing stimulus (i.e., an onset) was eliminated. In contrast, prioritization of an irrelevant color singleton—a stimulus that at most receives only mild prioritization in this paradigm—was increased under dual-task conditions. These results challenge the hypothesis that attention capture by irrelevant features is stimulus driven. Instead, prioritization depends on and is modulated by the availability of resources.

[1]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[3]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. Tellinghuisen,et al.  The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Steven Todd,et al.  Attentional misguidance in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. Yantis,et al.  New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  B. Gibson,et al.  Surprise! An Unexpected Color Singleton Does Not Capture Attention in Visual Search , 1998 .

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[13]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[14]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural Correlates of Attentional Capture in Visual Search , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  B. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.