Computerized color-vision test based upon postreceptoral channel sensitivities

An automated, computerized color-vision test was designed to diagnose congenital red–green color-vision defects. The observer viewed a yellow appearing CRT screen. The principle was to measure increment thresholds for three different chromaticities, the background yellow, a red, and a green chromaticity. Spatial and temporal parameters were chosen to favor parvocellular pathway mediation of thresholds. Thresholds for the three test stimuli were estimated by four-alternative forced-choice (4AFC), randomly interleaved staircases. Four 1.5-deg, 4.2 cd/m2 square pedestals were arranged as a 2 × 2 matrix around the center of the display with 15-minute separations. A trial incremented all four squares by 1.0 cd/m2 for 133 ms. One randomly chosen square included an extra increment of a test chromaticity. The observer identified the different appearing square using the cursor. Administration time was ∼5 minutes. Normal trichromats showed clear Sloan notch as defined by log (ΔY/ΔR), whereas red–green color defectives generally showed little or no Sloan notch, indicating that their thresholds were mediated by their luminance system, not by the chromatic system. Data from 107 normal trichromats showed a mean Sloan notch of 0.654 (SD = 0.123). Among 16 color-vision defectives tested (2 protanopes, 1 protanomal, 6 deuteranopes, & 7 deuteranomals), the Sloan notch was between −0.062 and 0.353 for deutans and was <−0.10 for protans. A sufficient number of color-defective observers have not yet been tested to determine whether the test can reliably discriminate between protans and deutans. Nevertheless, the current data show that the test can work as a quick diagnostic procedure (functional trichromatism or dichromatism) of red–green color-vision defect.

[1]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Congenital and acquired color vision defects , 1979 .

[2]  D. Foster,et al.  Test and field spectral sensitivities of colour mechanisms obtained on small white backgrounds: Actions of unitary opponent-colour processes? , 1983, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Increment threshold and purity discrimination spectral sensitivities of X-chromosome-linked color-defective observers , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Psychophysical Correlates of Parvo- and Magnocellular Function , 2003 .

[5]  Sophie M. Wuerger,et al.  'Color Vision: From Genes to Perception' , 2000 .

[6]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Chromatic Contrast Discrimination: Data and Prediction for Stimuli Varying in L and M Cone Excitation , 2000 .

[7]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. Nathans,et al.  Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision, and color blindness , 1999 .

[9]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Red-Green Cone Interactions in the Increment-Threshold Spectral Sensitivity of Primates , 1971, Science.

[11]  Louise L. Sloan The effect of intensity of light, state of adaptation of the eye, and size of photometric field on the visibility curve : a study of the purkinje phenomenon , 1928 .

[12]  N. Bayley A study of fear by means of the psychogalvanic technique. , 1928 .