LSDC a lossless approach to lifetime maximization in wireless sensor networks

In this paper, we outline an approach to improve the lifespan of a wireless sensor network by introducing a variant to standard sleep synchronization protocols. A multilayered architecture is used. To ensure even higher scalability and lower message size in any particular layer, number of layers is limited to four and each layer is broken into grids. Each grid acts a localized network where data aggregation and lifetime maximization algorithms are being run. In standard sleep protocols like GAF, each grid must have one of its nodes in active state. Our sleep protocol considers one node per grid to be in the idle listening state called the 'doze' state for a fixed interval of time. Thus we propose a multi-state proactive algorithm in the form of the sleep doze coordination (SDC) protocol to lower the duty cycle of each sensor node and maximize the network lifespan with lower power consumption. Node buffers are provided to bring about higher data accuracy and lossless network operation. Thus the node does not have to remain active throughout its 'on' period and its overall lifespan increases for a given amount of energy. Results indicate that near- optimal performance of SDC is achieved when buffer size is large enough to hold 25 data messages. SDC increases network lifetime by approximately 20% over previous protocols like GAF and S-DMAC. This buffered approach to the SDC protocol is called the lossless SDC (LSDC) protocol.

[1]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Minimum Energy Decentralized Estimation in a Wireless Sensor Network with Correlated Sensor Noises , 2005, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[2]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  Guaranteeing the network lifetime in wireless sensor networks: A MAC layer approach , 2007, Comput. Commun..

[3]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Energy Efficient Sleep/Wake Scheduling for Multi-Hop Sensor Networks: Non-Convexity and Approximation Algorithm , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[4]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Efficient grid-based routing in wireless multi-hop networks , 2005, 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'05).

[5]  Kishor S. Trivedi Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications , 1984 .

[6]  Mario Gerla,et al.  New bluetooth interconnection methods: Overlaid Bluetooth Piconets (OBP) and Temporary Scatternets (TS) , 2007, Comput. Commun..

[7]  Chung-Min Chen,et al.  Energy Saving via Power-Aware Buffering in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.

[9]  John I. McCool,et al.  Probability and Statistics With Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications , 2003, Technometrics.

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[11]  GerlaMario,et al.  New bluetooth interconnection methods , 2007 .

[12]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Data-aggregation techniques in sensor networks: a survey , 2006, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  David Gesbert,et al.  Maximizing Multicell Capacity Using Distributed Power Allocation and Scheduling , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[14]  S. Basagni,et al.  Sensor-DMAC: dynamic topology control for wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[15]  Arne A. Nilsson,et al.  Queuing Analysis of Power Management in the IEEE 802.11 Based Wireless LANs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.