Economy and embedded exhaustification

Building on previous works which argued that scalar implicatures can be computed in embedded positions, this paper proposes a constraint on exhaustification (an economy condition) which restricts the conditions under which an exhaustivity operator can be licensed. We show that this economy condition allows us to derive a number of generalizations, such as, in particular, the ‘Implicature Focus Generalization’: scalar implicatures can be embedded under a downward-entailing operator only if the (relevant) scalar term bears pitch accent. Our economy condition also derives specific predictions regarding the licensing of so-called Hurford disjunctions.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  Some Remarks on Grice’s Views about the Logical Particles of Natural Language , 1975 .

[2]  Robert van Rooij,et al.  Pragmatic Meaning and Non-monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation , 2006 .

[3]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[4]  D. Fox Too Many Alternatives: Density, Symmetry and Other Predicaments , 2007 .

[5]  Benjamin Spector,et al.  Comparing exhaustivity operators , 2017 .

[6]  D. Fox,et al.  Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction , 2015 .

[7]  Giorgio Magri Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments , 2011 .

[8]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle Innocent exclusion in an Alternative Semantics , 2008 .

[9]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures , 2011, J. Semant..

[10]  Laurence R. Horn A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[11]  Danny Fox,et al.  The universal density of measurement , 2007 .

[12]  Danny Fox,et al.  Two short notes on Schlenker's theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .

[13]  L. T. F. Gamut Logic, language, and meaning , 1991 .

[14]  Benjamin Spector,et al.  Bare Numerals and Scalar Implicatures , 2013, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[15]  Michael Franke,et al.  Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation , 2011 .

[16]  Corien Bary,et al.  Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles , 2011 .

[17]  J. Gajewski,et al.  In defense of the grammatical approach to local implicatures , 2012 .

[18]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  The Computation of Scalar Implicatures: Pragmatic, Lexical or Grammatical? , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[19]  Benjamin Russell,et al.  Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures , 2006, J. Semant..

[20]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[21]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Disjunction in Alternative Semantics , 2010 .

[22]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[23]  Benjamin Spector Aspects de la pragmatique des opérateurs logiques , 2006 .

[24]  B. Geurts,et al.  Background Materials for "Embedded implicatures?!?" , 2009 .

[25]  Marie-Christine Meyer Deriving Hurford's Constraint , 2014 .

[26]  Benjamin Spector 10: Scalar Implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean Reasoning , 2007 .

[27]  Michela Ippolito,et al.  A Note on Embedded Implicatures and Counterfactual Presuppositions , 2011, J. Semant..

[28]  Richard Breheny,et al.  A New Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Numerically Quantified Noun Phrases , 2007, J. Semant..

[29]  Roni Katzir A note on contrast , 2013 .

[30]  Roni Katzir,et al.  Structurally-defined alternatives , 2007 .

[31]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. , 2009 .

[32]  R. Schwarzschild Why Some Foci Must Associate 1 , 1997 .

[33]  D. Fox Cancelling the Maxim of Quantity: Another challenge for a Gricean theory of Scalar Implicatures , 2014 .

[34]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Always and Only: Why Not All Focus-Sensitive Operators Are Alike , 2003 .

[35]  Nicholas Fleisher Comparing theories of quantifiers in than clauses: Lessons from downward-entailing differentials , 2017 .

[36]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Plural Predication and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis , 2001, J. Semant..

[37]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences , 2004 .

[38]  S. Levinson Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[39]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[40]  Fred Landman,et al.  Plurals and Maximalization , 1998 .

[41]  Roni Katzir On the Roles of Markedness and Contradiction in the Use of Alternatives , 2014 .

[42]  Michela Ippolito,et al.  On the Meaning of Only , 2007, J. Semant..

[43]  Vincent Homer,et al.  Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals , 2015 .

[44]  D. Fox,et al.  On the characterization of alternatives , 2011 .

[46]  Christopher Kennedy A "de-Fregean" semantics (and neo-Gricean pragmatics) for modified and unmodified numerals , 2015 .

[47]  Giorgio Magri A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures , 2009 .

[48]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon , 2012 .

[49]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .

[50]  D. Fox Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures , 2007 .

[51]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Focus and Presupposition in Dynamic Interpretation , 1993, J. Semant..

[52]  Benjamin Spector,et al.  Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity , 2014 .

[53]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT* , 1999 .

[54]  Raj Singh,et al.  On the interpretation of disjunction: asymmetric, incremental, and eager for inconsistency , 2008 .

[55]  M. Dalrymple,et al.  Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity , 1998 .

[56]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[57]  Laurence R. Horn WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning , 2009 .

[58]  Katrin Schulz,et al.  Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences , 2004, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[59]  Chris Kennedy From Grammar to Meaning: A scalar semantics for scalar readings of number words , 2013 .