Vocabulary teaching strategies and conceptual representations of words in L2 in children: evidence with novice learners.

A controversial issue in bilingual research is whether in the early stages of L2 learning, access to the conceptual system involves mediation of L1 lexical representations [Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174] or a direct route from the L2 word [Altarriba, J., & Mathis, K. M. (1997). Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 550-568; Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 369-383]. The main goal of this paper is to study, in a child population, whether the creation of conceptual representations for L2 words is possible, even after only one session of learning of the L2 vocabulary. Furthermore, we do so by examining the efficacy of two different L2 learning methods: L2-L1 association learning vs. L2-picture association learning. A translation recognition task was employed to test whether there was a difference between a semantically related pair and an unrelated pair across conditions (i.e., a semantic interference effect). Results showed a significant semantic interference effect-a conceptual effect-in children after just one vocabulary learning session. Importantly, the L2-picture method produced a greater semantic interference effect than the L2-L1 method. The implications of these findings for models of bilingual memory are examined.

[1]  J. Peeck.  Retention of pictorial and verbal content of a text with illustrations. , 1974, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[3]  M. Pressley.  Imagery and Children’s Learning: Putting the Picture in Developmental Perspective , 1977 .

[4]  J. Kroll,et al.  Representation and Skill in Second Language Learners and Proficient Bilinguals , 2007 .

[5]  A. D. Groot,et al.  What Is Hard To Learn Is Easy To Forget: The Roles of Word Concreteness, Cognate Status, and Word Frequency in Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting. , 2000 .

[6]  J. Nicol,et al.  Semantic category effects in second language word learning , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[7]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language , 1998 .

[8]  C. Davis,et al.  BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Masked associative/semantic priming effects across languages with highly proficient bilinguals , 2008 .

[10]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Accessing word meaning in two languages: An event-related brain potential study of beginning bilinguals , 2003, Brain and Language.

[11]  Susanne Döpke,et al.  Cross-linguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism , 2001 .

[12]  Robert T. Elliott,et al.  Comparison of Different Feedback Procedures in Second Language Vocabulary Learning , 1997 .

[13]  Linda Jones,et al.  TESTING L2 VOCABULARY RECOGNITION AND RECALL USING PICTORIAL AND WRITTEN TEST ITEMS , 2004 .

[14]  E. Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Children Like Dense Neighborhoods: Orthographic Neighborhood Density Effects in Novel Readers , 2008, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[15]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[16]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  E-Hitz: A word frequency list and a program for deriving psycholinguistic statistics in an agglutinative language (Basque) , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[18]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[20]  Aafke Hulk,et al.  Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages , 2001, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[21]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  Language Acquisition and Brain Development , 2005, Science.

[23]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages , 1997, Nature.

[24]  J. Dixon,et al.  Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 2001 .

[25]  J. Kroll,et al.  The Development of Conceptual Representation for Words in a Second Language. , 2001 .

[26]  Wendy S. Francis,et al.  Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation , 2005 .

[27]  Michael J. A. Howe,et al.  Using Words and Pictures in Foreign Language Learning. , 1971 .

[28]  Joe Barcroft,et al.  Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Lexical Input Processing Approach , 2004 .

[29]  J. Paradis.  Second Language Acquisition in Childhood , 2008 .

[30]  J. Kroll,et al.  FIRST LANGUAGE ACTIVATION DURING SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL PROCESSING: An Investigation of Lexical Form, Meaning, and Grammatical Class , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[31]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Models of Bilingual Representation and Processing: Looking Back and to the Future. , 2005 .

[32]  L. Albertazzi,et al.  COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF BILINGUALISM , 2007 .

[33]  Joe Barcroft,et al.  Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition , 2002 .

[34]  W. Lambert,et al.  The differential effects of word and object stimuli on the learning of paired associates. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  R. Sánchez-Casas,et al.  Can a Horse Be a Donkey? Semantic and Form Interference Effects in Translation Recognition in Early and Late Proficient and Nonproficient Spanish-Catalan Bilinguals. , 2006 .

[36]  A. Paivio,et al.  Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? , 1973 .

[37]  J. Kroll,et al.  From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary , 1999, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[38]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Second Language Autonomy , 1997 .

[39]  J. Kroll,et al.  Handbook of bilingualism : psycholinguistic approaches , 2005 .

[40]  Katherine M. Mathis,et al.  Conceptual and Lexical Development in Second Language Acquisition , 1997 .

[41]  Janet L Nicol,et al.  One mind, two languages : bilingual language processing , 2001 .

[42]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  Free-association norms for the Spanish names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[43]  A. D. Groot,et al.  The learning of foreign language vocabulary , 2005 .

[44]  M. Pressley,et al.  Imagery Generation by Learning Disabled and Average-Achieving 11-to 13-Year-Olds , 1991 .

[45]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Lexical processing in a non-native language: Effects of language proficiency and learning strategy , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[46]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Word translation at three levels of proficiency in a second language : The ubiquitous involvement of conceptual memory , 1997 .