Increased osteoblast function on PLGA composites containing nanophase titania.

Nanotechnology creates materials that potentially outperform, at several boundaries, existing materials in terms of mechanical, electrical, catalytic, and optical properties. However, despite their promise to mimic the surface roughness cells experience in vivo, the use of nanophase materials in biological applications remains to date largely unexplored. The objective of the present in vitro study was, therefore, to determine whether when added to a polymer scaffold, nanophase compared to conventional ceramics enhance functions of osteoblasts (or bone-forming cells). Results from this study provided the first evidence that functions (specifically, adhesion, synthesis of alkaline phosphatase, and deposition of calcium-containing mineral) of osteoblasts increased on poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) scaffolds containing nanophase compared to conventional grain size titania with greater weight percentage (from 10-30 wt %). Because the chemistry, material phase, porosity (%), and pore size of the composites were similar, this study implies that the surface features created by adding nanophase compared to conventional titania was a key parameter that enhanced functions of osteoblasts. In this manner, the study adds another novel property of nanophase ceramics: their ability to promote osteoblast functions in vitro when added to a polymer scaffold. For this reason, nanophase ceramics (and nanomaterials in general) deserve further attention as orthopedic tissue engineering materials.

[1]  M. Dresselhaus,et al.  C 60 -Related Tubules and Spherules , 1996 .

[2]  R. W. Siegel,et al.  Grain size dependent mechanical properties in nanophase materials , 1994 .

[3]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  Richard W. Siegel,et al.  Creating Nanophase Materials , 1996 .

[5]  J M Anderson,et al.  Effects of photochemically immobilized polymer coatings on protein adsorption, cell adhesion, and the foreign body reaction to silicone rubber. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[7]  T. Webster,et al.  Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[8]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[9]  D. Deligianni,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[10]  Shawn Decker,et al.  Nanocrystals as Stoichiometric Reagents with Unique Surface Chemistry , 1996 .

[11]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[12]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[13]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced osteoclast-like cell functions on nanophase ceramics. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[14]  Thomas J. Webster,et al.  Improved osteoblast viability in the presence of smaller nanometre dimensioned carbon fibres , 2004 .

[15]  K. Gonsalves,et al.  Ftir study of a nanostructured aluminum nitride powder surface: Determination of the acidic/basic sites by CO, CO2 and acetic acid adsorptions , 1997 .

[16]  T. Webster,et al.  Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  P. Ma,et al.  Engineering new bone tissue in vitro on highly porous poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  J. Kohn,et al.  Small changes in polymer chemistry have a large effect on the bone-implant interface: evaluation of a series of degradable tyrosine-derived polycarbonates in bone defects. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[19]  Thomas J. Webster,et al.  Nano-biotechnology: carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants , 2004, Nanotechnology.

[20]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[21]  L. C. Jonghe,et al.  Sintering of Nanophase Γ-Al₂O₃ Powder , 1996 .

[22]  Alan E. Bell,et al.  NEXT-GENERATION COMPACT DISCS , 1996 .

[23]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast and Chrondrocyte Proliferation in the Presence of Alumina And Titania Nanoparticles , 2002 .

[24]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[25]  T. Webster Nanophase ceramics: The future orthopedic and dental implant material , 2001 .

[26]  R. W. Siegel,et al.  Mechanical properties of nanophase metals , 1994 .

[27]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Polymers with nano-dimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[28]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. , 2004, Biomaterials.