A new plan quality index for nasopharyngeal cancer SIB IMRT.

A new plan quality index integrating dosimetric and radiobiological indices was proposed to facilitate the evaluation and comparison of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. Ten NPC patients treated by SIB-IMRT were enrolled in the study. Custom software was developed to read dose-volume histogram (DVH) curves from the treatment planning system (TPS). A plan filtering matrix was introduced to filter plans that fail to satisfy treatment protocol. Target plan quality indices and organ at risk (OAR) plan quality indices were calculated for qualified plans. A unique composite plan quality index (CPQI) was proposed based on the relative weight of these indices to evaluate and compare competing plans. Plan ranking results were compared with detailed statistical analysis, radiation oncology quality system (ROQS) scoring results and physician's evaluation results to verify the accuracy of this new plan quality index. The average CPQI values for plans with OAR priority of low, normal, high, and PTV only were 0.22 ± 0.08, 0.49 ± 0.077, 0.71 ± 0.062, and -0.21 ± 0.16, respectively. There were significant differences among these plan quality indices (One-way ANOVA test, p < 0.01). This was consistent with statistical analysis, ROQS results and physician's ranking results in which 90% OAR high plans were selected. Plan filtering matrix was able to speed up the plan evaluation process. The new matrix plan quality index CPQI showed good consistence with physician ranking results. It is a promising index for NPC SIB-IMRT plan evaluation.

[1]  M Goitein,et al.  Implementation of a model for estimating tumor control probability for an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  G T Chen,et al.  Dose volume histogram analysis of liver radiation tolerance. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Bo Zhao,et al.  "SABER": A new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  S. Leung,et al.  Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  J. Llacer Inverse radiation treatment planning using the Dynamically Penalized Likelihood method. , 1997, Medical physics.

[6]  M. Kan,et al.  A new dose-volume-based Plan Quality Index for IMRT plan comparison. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  P. Kneschaurek,et al.  Three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose planning in stereotactic radiotherapy: Application of standard quality parameters for plan evaluation , 2006 .

[8]  M. Goitein,et al.  Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  R Mohan,et al.  Radiobiological considerations in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  P Okunieff,et al.  Radiation dose-response of human tumors. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Modeling of normal tissue response to radiation: the critical volume model. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Douglas L. Jones ICRU Report 50—Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy , 1994 .

[14]  T D Solberg,et al.  Comparative behaviour of the dynamically penalized likelihood algorithm in inverse radiation therapy planning. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Jin Xiance,et al.  Technical and dosimetric considerations in multi-isocenter intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with small multileaf collimator. , 2009, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[16]  James Wheeler,et al.  Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[17]  Xiance Jin,et al.  Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: A local center’s experience , 2006 .

[18]  P. Xia,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Georges Noël,et al.  Conformity index: a review. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Walter R. Bosch,et al.  Phase II Multi-institutional Study of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) +/− Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal (NPC) Carcinoma: Preliminary Clinical Results of RTOG 0225 , 2008 .

[21]  I J Das,et al.  Treatment plan evaluation using dose-volume histogram (DVH) and spatial dose-volume histogram (zDVH). , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.