The importance of murine cortical bone microstructure for microcrack initiation and propagation.

In order to better understand bone postyield behavior and consequently bone failure behavior, this study aimed first to investigate cortical bone microstructure and second, to relate cortical bone microstructure to microdamage initiation and propagation in C57BL/6 (B6) and C3H/He (C3H) mice; two murine inbred strains known for their differences in bone phenotype. Murine femora of B6 and C3H were loaded axially under compression in a stepwise manner. For each loading step, 3D data sets at a nominal resolution of 700 nm were acquired by means of synchrotron radiation-based computed tomography. Cortical bone microstructure was divided into three phases: the canal network, the osteocyte lacunar system, and microdamage. Canal volume density and canal unit volume both correlated highly to crack number density (canal volume density: R(2)=0.64, p<0.005 and canal unit volume: R(2)=0.75, p<0.001). Moreover, the large canal units in C3H bone were responsible for more microdamage accumulation compared to B6 bones. This more pronounced microdamage accumulation due to large intracortical bone voids, which eventually leads to a fatal macrocrack (fracture), represents a potential contributing factor to the higher incidence of bone fractures in the elderly.

[1]  L. Donahue,et al.  Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice. , 1996, Bone.

[2]  J. Currey.  The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R O Ritchie,et al.  The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. , 2008, Nature materials.

[4]  D Vashishth,et al.  A non-invasive in vitro technique for the three-dimensional quantification of microdamage in trabecular bone. , 2007, Bone.

[5]  J. Currey.  The many adaptations of bone. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Y. Yeni,et al.  The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. , 1997, Bone.

[7]  T. Smit,et al.  Osteocyte morphology in fibula and calvaria --- is there a role for mechanosensing? , 2008, Bone.

[8]  G A Churchill,et al.  Quantitative Trait Loci for Femoral and Lumbar Vertebral Bone Mineral Density in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ Inbred Strains of Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  R Müller,et al.  Variation in Bone Biomechanical Properties, Microstructure, and Density in BXH Recombinant Inbred Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  A. Malkani,et al.  Bone Blood Flow and Vascular Reactivity , 2001, Cells Tissues Organs.

[11]  R Vincentelli,et al.  The effect of Haversian remodeling on the tensile properties of human cortical bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J A McGeough,et al.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Robert O Ritchie,et al.  On the effect of X-ray irradiation on the deformation and fracture behavior of human cortical bone. , 2010, Bone.

[14]  Peter Zioupos,et al.  The extent of microcracking and the morphology of microcracks in damaged bone , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[15]  P Zioupos,et al.  Ageing Human Bone: Factors Affecting its Biomechanical Properties and the Role of Collagen , 2001, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[16]  T. Diab,et al.  Effects of damage morphology on cortical bone fragility. , 2005, Bone.

[17]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Stress-concentrating effect of resorption lacunae in trabecular bone. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Joseph H. Nadeau,et al.  Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice , 2003, Mammalian Genome.

[19]  C H Turner,et al.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. , 1993, Bone.

[20]  David Taylor,et al.  The role of osteocytes and bone microstructure in preventing osteoporotic fractures , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  R. Recker,et al.  Genetic Variations in Bone Density, Histomorphometry, and Strength in Mice , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  P. Schneider,et al.  Ultrastructural Properties in Cortical Bone Vary Greatly in Two Inbred Strains of Mice as Assessed by Synchrotron Light Based Micro‐ and Nano‐CT , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  W. Ambrosius,et al.  Does microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone? , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  Stuart J Warden,et al.  A comparison of mechanical properties derived from multiple skeletal sites in mice. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Automated compartmental analysis for high-throughput skeletal phenotyping in femora of genetic mouse models. , 2007, Bone.

[27]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Effect of aging on the toughness of human cortical bone: evaluation by R-curves. , 2004, Bone.

[28]  Erik L. Ritman,et al.  Local Tomography II , 1997, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[29]  Deepak Vashishth,et al.  Morphology, localization and accumulation of in vivo microdamage in human cortical bone. , 2007, Bone.

[30]  L. Donahue,et al.  Genetics and bone. Using the mouse to understand man. , 2002, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[31]  D. Davy,et al.  Relationship between damage accumulation and mechanical property degradation in cortical bone: microcrack orientation is important. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[32]  Carol J. Bult,et al.  The mouse as a model for human biology: a resource guide for complex trait analysis , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  Marco Stampanoni,et al.  The materials science beamline at the Swiss Light Source: design and realization , 2005 .

[34]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. , 1988, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[35]  Bruce Martin,et al.  Aging and strength of bone as a structural material , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[36]  C. Ackert-Bicknell,et al.  Genetic variation in femur extrinsic strength in 29 different inbred strains of mice is dependent on variations in femur cross-sectional geometry and bone density. , 2005, Bone.

[37]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[38]  C. Turner.  Biomechanics of Bone: Determinants of Skeletal Fragility and Bone Quality , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[39]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis. , 2007, Bone.

[40]  P. Schneider,et al.  Post-processing technique for improved assessment of hard tissues in the submicrometer domain using local synchrotron radiation-based computed tomography / Nachbearbeitungstechnik für eine verbesserte Erfassung harten Gewebes im Submikrometerbereich mittels lokaler synchrotronstrahlungsbasierter Com , 2009, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[41]  J G Clement,et al.  Bone size and mechanics at the femoral diaphysis across age and sex. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  D. E. Pennington,et al.  Bone Brittleness Varies with Genetic Background in A/J and C57BL/6J Inbred Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[44]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Cortical Bone in the Human Femoral Neck: Three‐Dimensional Appearance and Porosity Using Synchrotron Radiation , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[45]  K. Jepsen.  The aging cortex: to crack or not to crack , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[46]  Daniel P Nicolella,et al.  Osteocyte lacunae tissue strain in cortical bone. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[48]  G H van Lenthe,et al.  Time-lapsed assessment of microcrack initiation and propagation in murine cortical bone at submicrometer resolution. , 2009, Bone.

[49]  Marco Stampanoni,et al.  High resolution X-ray detector for synchrotron-based microtomography , 2002 .

[50]  R Müller,et al.  Genetic Regulation of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Strength and Microstructure in Inbred Strains of Mice , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[51]  C Milgrom,et al.  Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. , 1995, Bone.

[52]  Andrei L. Turinsky,et al.  Age-dependent change in the 3D structure of cortical porosity at the human femoral midshaft. , 2007, Bone.

[53]  Simon Henein,et al.  TOMCAT: A beamline for TOmographic Microscopy and Coherent rAdiology experimenTs , 2007 .

[54]  D Vashishth,et al.  In vivo diffuse damage in human vertebral trabecular bone. , 2000, Bone.

[55]  D. Fyhrie,et al.  The morphological association between microcracks and osteocyte lacunae in human cortical bone. , 2005, Bone.