Interaction of stereo and texture cues in the perception of three-dimensional steps

A computational method for calibrating stereo using shape-from-texture is described together with five experiments that tested whether the human visual system implements the method. The experiments all tested the prediction that the perceived size of a step between two planar and slanted real surfaces should be affected by texture slant cues projected on to them that are inconsistent with the disparity cues. The predicted effect was observed but the results could be accounted for by a new phenomenon revealed in control conditions: the perceived size of a step between two slanted planes is in part determined by the size of the slants even when texture and stereo cues are held consistent. We conclude that the hypothesis that human stereo is calibrated by texture is not confirmed.

[1]  John P. Frisby Vision: An old illusion and a new theory of stereoscopic depth perception , 1984, Nature.

[2]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Qualitative Depth from Stereo, with Applications , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Experiments on Stereo and Texture Cue Combination in Human Vision Using Quasi-Neutral Viewing , 1992 .

[5]  J. Porrill,et al.  Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  J M Foley,et al.  Binocular distance perception: egocentric distance tasks. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  Brian J. Rogers Why the eye doesn't shape up , 1991, Nature.

[9]  T. Collett,et al.  Does vertical disparity scale the perception of stereoscopic depth? , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  D. Whitteridge Movements of the eyes R. H. S. Carpenter, Pion Ltd, London (1977), 420 pp., $27.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[11]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Computational models of visual processing , 1991 .

[12]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Computational Issues in Solving the Stereo Correspondence ProblemComputational Issues in Solving the Stereo Correspondence Problem , 1991 .

[13]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape , 1991, Nature.

[14]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[15]  J. T. Enright Exploring the third dimension with eye movements: Better than stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[16]  H Collewijn,et al.  Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[17]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Vertical disparity pooling and the induced effect , 1984, Nature.

[18]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[19]  J. M. Foley Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[20]  J Mayhew,et al.  The Interpretation of Stereo-Disparity Information: The Computation of Surface Orientation and Depth , 1982, Perception.

[21]  Eileen Kowler Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[22]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins The Role of the Vertical Dimension in Stereoscopic Vision , 1982, Perception.

[23]  John E. W. Mayhew,et al.  The adaptive control of a four-degrees-of-freedom stereo camera head , 1992 .

[24]  T S Collett,et al.  The Interaction of Oculomotor Cues and Stimulus Size in Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1991, Perception.

[25]  Lei Liu,et al.  A polar coordinate system for describing binocular disparity , 1994, Vision Research.

[26]  Brian J. Rogers,et al.  The Perception and Representation of Depth and Slant in Stereoscopic Surfaces , 1992 .

[27]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.