Enhancing undergraduate chemistry learning by helping students make connections among multiple graphical representations

Multiple representations are ubiquitous in chemistry education. To benefit from multiple representations, students have to make connections between them. However, connection making is a difficult task for students. Prior research shows that supporting connection making enhances students' learning in math and science domains. Most prior research has focused on supporting one type of connection-making process: conceptually making sense of connections among representations. Yet, recent research suggests that a second type of connection-making process plays a role in students' learning: perceptual fluency in translating among representations. I hypothesized that combining support for both conceptual sense making of connections and for perceptual fluency in connection making leads to higher learning gains in general chemistry among undergraduate students. I tested this hypothesis in two experiments with altogether N = 158 undergraduate students using an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry atomic structure and bonding. Results suggest that the combination of conceptual sense-making support and perceptual fluency-building support for connection making is effective for students with low prior knowledge, whereas students with high prior knowledge benefit most from receiving perceptual fluency-building support alone. This finding suggests that students' learning in chemistry can be enhanced if instruction provides support for connection making among multiple representations in a way that tailors to their specific learning needs.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[3]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  A Symmetry POGIL Activity for Inorganic Chemistry , 2012 .

[4]  E. Gibson Perceptual Learning in Development: Some Basic Concepts , 2000 .

[5]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Rayane F. Moreira A Game for the Early and Rapid Assimilation of Organic Nomenclature , 2013 .

[9]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[10]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[11]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Michael L. Eastwood,et al.  Fastest Fingers: A Molecule-Building Game for Teaching Organic Chemistry , 2013 .

[13]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Multiple Representations in Chemical Education , 2009 .

[14]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists * , 2006, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[15]  C. W. Bowen,et al.  Representational Systems Used by Graduate Students while Problem Solving in Organic Synthesis. , 1990 .

[16]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Mental Models : The Role of Representations in Problem Solving in Chemistry PROCEEDINGS , 2002 .

[17]  Vickie M. Williamson Teaching Chemistry Conceptually , 2014 .

[18]  Timothy J. Nokes-Malach,et al.  Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change , 2012 .

[19]  M. Stieff Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science , 2007 .

[20]  John Airey,et al.  A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes , 2009 .

[21]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[22]  Melanie M. Cooper,et al.  Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? , 2012 .

[23]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reuniting perception and conception , 1998, Cognition.

[24]  P. Kellman,et al.  Perceptual learning and human expertise. , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[25]  Daniel Bodemer,et al.  External and mental referencing of multiple representations , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Theodore L. Brown Chemistry: The Central Science , 1981 .

[27]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Handbook of cognition , 2005 .

[28]  Rosária Justi,et al.  The Application of a ‘Model of Modelling’ to Illustrate the Importance of Metavisualisation in Respect of the Three Types of Representation , 2009 .

[29]  C. Furió,et al.  Functional fixedness and functional reduction as common sense reasonings in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules , 2000 .

[30]  Jack F. Eichler,et al.  Online Homework Put to the Test: A Report on the Impact of Two Online Learning Systems on Student Performance in General Chemistry. , 2013 .

[31]  M. Stieff Sex Differences in the Mental Rotation of Chemistry Representations , 2013 .

[32]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[33]  Iztok Devetak,et al.  Learning with understanding in the chemistry classroom. , 2014 .

[34]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[35]  Richard I. Anderson CHI student chapters & chapter subgroups , 2001, CHIB.

[36]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Road To Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games , 1996 .

[37]  P. Kellman,et al.  Perceptual Learning, Cognition, and Expertise , 2013 .

[38]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[39]  A. Shusterman,et al.  Teaching Chemistry with Electron Density Models , 1997 .

[40]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving Problems: Effects of Self-Explanation Prompts and Fading Worked-Out Steps. , 2003 .

[41]  T. Jong,et al.  Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment , 2006 .

[42]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[43]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[44]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Representational Resources for Constructing Shared Understandings in the High School Chemistry Classroom , 2008 .

[45]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[46]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education , 2013 .

[47]  Billie Eilam,et al.  Possible Constraints of Visualization in Biology: Challenges in Learning with Multiple Representations , 2013 .

[48]  Adam Kraft,et al.  What happens when representations fail to represent? Graduate students’ mental models of organic chemistry diagrams , 2010 .

[49]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The effects of directive self-explanation prompts to support active processing of multiple representations in a simulation-based learning environment , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[51]  W. C. Chung Three-Dimensional Atomic Orbital Plots in the Classroom Using Winplot , 2013 .

[52]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Visualization in science education , 2005 .

[53]  Chi-Yan Tsui,et al.  Multiple representations in biological education , 2013 .

[54]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Connection making between multiple graphical representations: A multi-methods approach for domain-specific grounding of an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[55]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[56]  R. Säljö,et al.  Expertise Differences in the Comprehension of Visualizations: a Meta-Analysis of Eye-Tracking Research in Professional Domains , 2011 .

[57]  G. Höst,et al.  Students’ Use of Three Different Visual Representations To Interpret Whether Molecules Are Polar or Nonpolar , 2012 .

[58]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Visualization : theory and practice in science education , 2008 .

[59]  A. Johnstone Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[60]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  Developmental Cognitive Science Goes to School , 2013 .

[61]  Zachary A. Pardos,et al.  How Should Intelligent Tutoring Systems Sequence Multiple Graphical Representations of Fractions? A Multi-Methods Study , 2013, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[62]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Connected Chemistry—A Novel Modeling Environment for the Chemistry Classroom , 2005 .

[63]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Students Becoming Chemists: Developing Representationl Competence , 2005 .

[64]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Learning at the Symbolic Level , 2009 .

[65]  Tina Seufert Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[66]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[67]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Topics in Cognitive Science , 2009 .

[68]  Ronald J. Gillespie,et al.  Understanding and Interpreting Molecular Electron Density Distributions , 2002 .

[69]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[70]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  Generating cognitive dissonance in student interviews through multiple representations , 2012 .

[71]  Onno De Jong,et al.  Representations of chemical bonding models in school textbooks – help or hindrance for understanding? , 2013 .

[72]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Identifying Representational Competence With Multi-Representational Displays , 2011 .

[73]  D. Uttal,et al.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[74]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Chemistry Education: Ten Facets to Shape Us. , 2013 .

[75]  B. Laeng,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[76]  Vickie M. Williamson,et al.  Textbook Treatments of Electrostatic Potential Maps in General and Organic Chemistry , 2013 .

[77]  Bernd Faust Technology Enhanced Learning Opportunities For Change , 2016 .

[78]  Bette Davidowitz,et al.  Linking the macroscopic and sub-microscopic levels : diagrams , 2009 .

[79]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Comprehending and Learning from ‘Visualizations’: A Developmental Perspective , 2008 .

[80]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning of Chemistry , 2005 .

[81]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..