A conceptual of teaching models inquiry-based social constructivism (IbSC)

This study aims to 1) review the five-stage levels of inquiry learning, 2) describe the relationship of inquiry learning with social constructivism. 3) describe the conceptual models of inquiry-based social constructivism (IbSC) in chemistry learning. The 5-stage levels of inquiry learning recommended by Wenning are observation, manipulation, generalization, verification, application. This research is a qualitative descriptive based on literature from the five-stage levels of inquiry with psychology unsure a social constructivism as an effort to maximize the learning of chemistry. The results show that the five-stage levels of inquiry learning are founded some weaknesses, the learning process is an individualist, the social element is low and collaborative learning is weak, therefore in learning need to exchange information and ideas between an individual in the group and another. Conceptually the weakness of inquiry learning can be minimized through the added element of social constructivism. The syntax of inquiry-based social constructivism (IbSC) model can be formulated into 6 steps consist of observation, peer reconstruction, peer manipulation, generalization, peer verification, and application.

[1]  Sajidan,et al.  Inquiry laboratory: An appropriate learning model for teaching salt hydrolysis in chemistry , 2018 .

[2]  Purnomo,et al.  The Conceptual Model of Community Learning Center (PKBM) in Indonesia and Community Cultural Learning Center (Kominkan) in Japan , 2018, International Journal of Engineering & Technology.

[3]  Setuju,et al.  The Development of Blog with Nos Within Inquiry Laboratory an Approach for Developing Scientific Literacy of the Student in Junior High School , 2018, International Journal of Engineering & Technology.

[4]  I. Akhlis,et al.  The Effect of Inquiry-Based Independent Worksheet Using ICT Towards Science Learning to Embody the Student's Creativity and Characters , 2018 .

[5]  SlaĿana ŽivkoviĿ,et al.  A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century , 2016 .

[6]  Letitiţia Trif Training Models of Social Constructivism. Teaching Based on Developing A Scaffold , 2015 .

[7]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Self‐Regulation and Learning , 2012 .

[8]  John Woollard,et al.  Psychology for the Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning , 2010 .

[9]  Ibrahim Bilgin,et al.  The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students' achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction , 2009 .

[10]  E. Terhart,et al.  Constructivism and teaching: A new paradigm in general didactics? , 2003 .

[11]  Jiska Engelbert,et al.  Social construction of reality , 2016 .

[12]  Hanieh Davatgari Asl,et al.  Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism , 2015 .

[13]  Carl J. Wenning,et al.  Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning sequences to teach science , 2010 .

[14]  Christina V. Schwarz,et al.  Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K‐8 science teaching , 2007 .

[15]  Carl J. Wenning,et al.  Implementing inquiry-based instruction in the science classroom: A new model for solving the improvement-of-practice problem , 2005 .

[16]  Carl J. Wenning,et al.  Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes , 2004 .