Evaluating the comparative performance of countries of the Middle East and North Africa: A DEA application

Abstract Over the past few decades, countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have achieved varying levels of economic development. In this paper, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is employed to study the comparative performance of selected MENA countries. For 1999, our DEA identified four of the 18 countries studied as the most efficient: Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. All are from the Middle East, with three being members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Yemen was rated as the least efficient of all countries considered in the analysis. A regression analysis showed that the efficiency scores have a significant relationship with the richness of the countries (in terms of GNP per capita) but do not have a significant relationship with the size of the countries (in terms of population). Further, a time-series analysis using the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) indicated that the MENA countries achieved higher values of desirable attributes, and lower values of undesirable attributes, in 1999 compared to 1998. During 1998–1999, technology change contributed more to the improvement of MPI than did technical efficiency change.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The global competitiveness report 2000-2001 , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen Haag,et al.  Efficient provision of child quality of life in less developed countries: conventional development indexes versus a programming approach to development indexes , 2000 .

[4]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[5]  M. El-Sakka,et al.  Demand for Imports in the GCC Countries , 1999 .

[6]  Qing Wang,et al.  Fiscal Expenditure Policy and Non-Oil Economic Growth: Evidence from GCC Countries , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[8]  Ramu Ramanathan,et al.  An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[10]  Michael Norman,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance , 1991 .

[11]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[12]  S. Malmquist.  Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[13]  C. Sassanpour.  Policy challenges in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries , 1996 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[15]  Boaz Golany,et al.  The Economic and Social Performance of Nations: Efficiency and Returns to Scale , 1997 .

[16]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO 2 emissions: a cross-country comparison , 2002 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[18]  A New Methodology for Comparative Analysis of Poverty in the Mediterranean: A Model for Differential Analysis of Poverty at A Regional Level , 2000 .

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[20]  Khalifa H. Ghali,et al.  Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: A Study Relating to the United Arab Emirates , 1997 .