Analysis of heat and mass transfer by CFD for performance enhancement in direct contact membrane distillation

A comprehensive analysis on the dominant effects for heat and mass transfer in the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) process has been performed with the aid of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for hollow fiber modules without and with annular baffles attached to the shell wall. Potential enhancement strategies under different circumstances have been investigated. Numerical simulations were carried out to investigate the effect of the MD intrinsic mass-transfer coefficient of the membrane (C) on the performance enhancement for both non-baffled and baffled modules. It was found that the temperature polarization coefficient (TPC) decreases significantly with increasing C value regardless of the existence of baffles, signifying a loss of overall driving force. However, the higher C compensated for this and the mass flux showed an increasing trend. A membrane with a lower C value was found to be less vulnerable to the TP effect. In this case, the introduction of turbulence aids such as baffles did not show substantial effect to improve system performance. In contrast, introducing baffles into the module can greatly enhance the mass flux and the TPC for a membrane with a high C value, where the main heat-transfer resistance is determined by the fluid side boundary layers. The effect of operating temperature on heat and mass transfer in the MD process was also studied with a membrane of a lower C value (2.0 × 10−7 kg m−2 s−1 Pa−1). Although the TPC generally decreased with increasing operating temperatures, the mass flux Nm increased significantly when operating temperature increased. A baffled module showed a more significant improvement than a non-baffle module at a higher temperature. Moreover, it was confirmed that higher operating temperatures are preferable for a substantial improvement in the heat/mass transfer as well as MD thermal efficiency, even with a relatively small transmembrane temperature difference of 10 K.

[1]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Heat and mass transfer in membrane distillation , 1987 .

[2]  Jose Miguel Rodriguez-Maroto,et al.  Effects of membrane and module design improvements on flux in direct contact membrane distillation , 2007 .

[3]  M. Shakaib,et al.  CFD modeling for flow and mass transfer in spacer-obstructed membrane feed channels , 2009 .

[4]  S. Aravinth,et al.  Prediction of heat and mass transfer for fully developed turbulent fluid flow through tubes , 2000 .

[5]  Takeshi Matsuura,et al.  Simulation of heat and mass transfer in direct contact membrane distillation (MD): The effect of membrane physical properties , 2005 .

[6]  M. Qtaishat,et al.  Heat and mass transfer analysis in direct contact membrane distillation , 2008 .

[7]  Xing Yang,et al.  Numerical simulation of heat and mass transfer in direct membrane distillation in a hollow fiber module with laminar flow , 2011 .

[8]  K. Sirkar,et al.  Novel membrane and device for direct contact membrane distillation-based desalination process , 2004 .

[9]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Experimental study of desalination using direct contact membrane distillation: a new approach to flux enhancement , 2004 .

[10]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  MASS FLUX ENHANCEMENT USING SPACER FILLED CHANNELS IN DIRECT CONTACT MEMBRANE DISTILLATION , 2001 .

[11]  E. Drioli,et al.  MEMBRANE DISTILLATION , 2012 .

[12]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Factors affecting flux in membrane distillation , 1990 .

[13]  Linh T. T. Vu,et al.  Modelling the simultaneous heat and mass transfer of direct contact membrane distillation in hollow fibre modules , 2010 .

[14]  D. R. Lloyd,et al.  Membrane distillation. II. Direct contact MD , 1996 .

[15]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  A new model for mass transfer in direct contact membrane distillation , 2003 .

[16]  Stephen R Gray,et al.  Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): Experimental study on the commercial PTFE membrane and , 2011 .

[17]  Antoni W. Morawski,et al.  Membrane distillation with laminar flow , 1997 .

[18]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[19]  Jack Gilron,et al.  Direct Contact Membrane Distillation-Based Desalination: Novel Membranes, Devices, Larger-Scale Studies, and a Model , 2007 .

[20]  Timo Hyppänen,et al.  Fundamentals of heat transfer , 2012 .

[21]  Zhanfeng Cui,et al.  CFD modelling of gas-sparged ultrafiltration in tubular membranes , 2002 .

[22]  Marek Gryta,et al.  Heat transport in the membrane distillation process , 1998 .

[23]  Mohamed Khayet,et al.  A framework for better understanding membrane distillation separation process , 2006 .

[24]  L. Martinez-diez,et al.  A method to evaluate coefficients affecting flux in membrane distillation , 2000 .

[25]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Review of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modules , 2010 .

[26]  S. M. Holzer,et al.  Book Reviews : SYSTEM DYNAMICS Katsuhiko Ogata Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978 , 1980 .

[27]  Xing Yang,et al.  Performance improvement of PVDF hollow fiber-based membrane distillation process , 2011 .

[28]  L. Mart́ıneza,et al.  Characterization of membrane distillation modules and analysis of mass flux enhancement by channel spacers , 2006 .

[29]  Li-Zhi Zhang,et al.  Heat and mass transfer in a quasi-counter flow membrane-based total heat exchanger , 2010 .

[30]  May May Teoh,et al.  Investigation of different hollow fiber module designs for flux enhancement in the membrane distillation process , 2008 .

[31]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The efficient use of energy in membrane distillation , 1987 .

[32]  Peng Wang,et al.  Morphological architecture of dual-layer hollow fiber for membrane distillation with higher desalination performance. , 2011, Water research.

[33]  Cai-Hang Liang,et al.  Conjugate heat and mass transfer in membrane-formed channels in all entry regions , 2010 .