LTD windows of the STDP learning rule and synaptic connections having a large transmission delay enable robust sequence learning amid background noise

Spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP) is a simple and effective learning rule for sequence learning. However, synapses being subject to STDP rules are readily influenced in noisy circumstances because synaptic conductances are modified by pre- and postsynaptic spikes elicited within a few tens of milliseconds, regardless of whether those spikes convey information or not. Noisy firing existing everywhere in the brain may induce irrelevant enhancement of synaptic connections through STDP rules and would result in uncertain memory encoding and obscure memory patterns. We will here show that the LTD windows of the STDP rules enable robust sequence learning amid background noise in cooperation with a large signal transmission delay between neurons and a theta rhythm, using a network model of the entorhinal cortex layer II with entorhinal-hippocampal loop connections. The important element of the present model for robust sequence learning amid background noise is the symmetric STDP rule having LTD windows on both sides of the LTP window, in addition to the loop connections having a large signal transmission delay and the theta rhythm pacing activities of stellate cells. Above all, the LTD window in the range of positive spike-timing is important to prevent influences of noise with the progress of sequence learning.

[1]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Replay of Neuronal Firing Sequences in Rat Hippocampus During Sleep Following Spatial Experience , 1996, Science.

[2]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Ming-Yuan Min,et al.  Spike‐timing‐dependent plasticity at resting and conditioned lateral perforant path synapses on granule cells in the dentate gyrus: different roles of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  G. Buzsáki Two-stage model of memory trace formation: A role for “noisy” brain states , 1989, Neuroscience.

[5]  Yoko Yamaguchi,et al.  Neural dynamics of the cognitive map in the hippocampus , 2007, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[6]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  Simulations of the Role of the Muscarinic-Activated Calcium-Sensitive Nonspecific Cation CurrentINCM in Entorhinal Neuronal Activity during Delayed Matching Tasks , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  Properties and role of I(h) in the pacing of subthreshold oscillations in entorhinal cortex layer II neurons. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Learning Navigational Maps Through Potentiation and Modulation of Hippocampal Place Cells , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[9]  Frank Moss,et al.  THE DETECTION THRESHOLD, NOISE AND STOCHASTIC RESONANCE IN THE FITZHUGH-NAGUMO NEURON MODEL , 1995 .

[10]  Kamal Sen,et al.  Increasing Ca2+ transients by broadening postsynaptic action potentials enhances timing-dependent synaptic depression. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Poo,et al.  Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification , 2000, Nature.

[12]  Takeshi Aihara,et al.  Spatial analysis of spike‐timing‐dependent LTP and LTD in the CA1 area of hippocampal slices using optical imaging , 2005, Hippocampus.

[13]  Jun Igarashi,et al.  Theta phase coding in a network model of the entorhinal cortex layer II with entorhinal-hippocampal loop connections , 2007, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[14]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Yi-Wen Lin,et al.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity ( STDP ) at resting and conditioned lateral perforant path synapses on granule cells in the dentate gyrus : different roles of NMDA and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors , 2005 .

[16]  Hatsuo Hayashi,et al.  Stochastic resonance in the hippocampal CA3-CA1 model: a possible memory recall mechanism , 2002, Neural Networks.

[17]  Hatsuo Hayashi,et al.  Regulation of spontaneous rhythmic activity and organization of pacemakers as memory traces by spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity in a hippocampal model. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[19]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Phase relationship between hippocampal place units and the EEG theta rhythm , 1993, Hippocampus.

[20]  Michael E Hasselmo,et al.  Ionic mechanisms in the generation of subthreshold oscillations and action potential clustering in entorhinal layer II stellate neurons , 2004, Hippocampus.