Making Adversary Decision Modeling Tractable with Intent Inference and Information Fusion 1

Military and domestic security analysts and planners are facing threats whose asymmetric nature will sharply increase the challenges of establishing an adversary's intent. This complex environment will severely limit the capabilities of the classic doctrinal approach to diagnose adversary activity. Instead, a more dynamic approach is required - adversary decision modeling (ADM) - that, while a critical capability, poses a range of daunting technological challenges. We are developing methodologies and tools that represent a tractable approach to ADM using intelligent software-based analysis of adversarial intent. In this paper we present work being performed by our team (University of Connecticut, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, and the Air Force Research Laboratory Human Effectiveness Directorate) toward a preliminary composite theory of adversary intent and its descriptive models, to provide a coherent conceptual foundation for addressing adversary decision processes, tasks, and functions. We then introduce notional computational models that, given own system- of-systems actions (movements and activities) and observations of an adversary's actions and reactions, automatically generate hypotheses about the adversary's intent. We present a preliminary software architecture that implements the model with: (1) intelligent mobile agents to rapidly and autonomously collect information, (2) information fusion technologies to generate higher-level evidence, and (3) our Intent Inference engine that models interests, preferences, and context.

[1]  Jerry Franke,et al.  Enhancing Teamwork Through Team-Level Intent Inference , 2000 .

[2]  Benjamin Bell,et al.  Leveraging Task Models for Team Intent Inference , 2000 .

[3]  Eugene Santos,et al.  Active User Interfaces For Building Decision-Theoretic Systems , 1999 .

[4]  Lockheed Martin,et al.  Multi-Sensor Track Classification in Rotorcraft Pilot's Associate Data Fusion , 1997 .

[5]  J. Llinas,et al.  Studies and Analyses of Aided Adversarial Decision Making. Phase 2: Research on Human Trust in Automation , 1998 .

[6]  Jody J. Daniels,et al.  Listen-Communicate-Show: Spoken Language Command of Agent-based Remote Information Access , 2001, HLT.

[7]  Craig Stoneking,et al.  Army Aviation Fusion of Sensor-Pushed and Agent-Pulled Information , 2001 .

[8]  Eugene Santos,et al.  Utility Theory-Based User Models for Intelligent Interface Agents , 1998, Canadian Conference on AI.

[9]  Colin Drury,et al.  Studies and Analyses of Vulnerabilities in Aided Adversarial Decision Making , 1998 .

[10]  Stephen M. Jameson,et al.  Architectures for Distributed Information Fusion To Support Situation Awareness on the Digital Battlefield , 2002 .

[11]  Eugene Santos,et al.  Dynamic User Model Construction with Bayesian Networks for Intelligent Information Queries , 1999, FLAIRS.

[12]  Daria Chacón,et al.  Intelligent Mobile Agents in the Military Domain , 2000 .

[13]  Eugene Santos,et al.  A framework for building knowledge-bases under uncertainty , 1999, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[14]  Kenneth R. Whitebread,et al.  CAST Agents : Network-Centric Fires Unleashed , 2002 .

[15]  Steve Jameson,et al.  Information Discovery in High-Volume, Frequently Changing Data , 1995, IEEE Expert.

[16]  Eugene Santos,et al.  Medical Document Information Retrieval through Active User Interfaces , 2000 .