The formation of bulges, discs and two-component galaxies in the CANDELS Survey at z < 3

We examine a sample of 1495 galaxies in the CANDELS fields to determine the evolution of two-component galaxies, including bulges and discs, within massive galaxies at the epoch 1 < z < 3 when the Hubble sequence forms. We fit all of our galaxies’ light profiles with a single Sersic fit, as well as with a combination of exponential and Sersic profiles. The latter is done in order to describe a galaxy with an inner and an outer component, or bulge and disc component. We develop and use three classification methods (visual, F-test and the residual flux fraction) to separate our sample into one-component galaxies (disc/spheroids-like galaxies) and two-component galaxies (galaxies formed by an ‘inner part’ or bulge and an ‘outer part’ or disc). We then compare the results from using these three different ways to classify our galaxies. We find that the fraction of galaxies selected as two-component galaxies increases on average 50 per cent from the lowest mass bin to the most massive galaxies, and decreases with redshift by a factor of 4 from z = 1 to 3. We find that single Sersic ‘disc-like’ galaxies have the highest relative number densities at all redshifts, and that two-component galaxies have the greatest increase and become at par with Sersic discs by z = 1. We also find that the systems we classify as two-component galaxies have an increase in the sizes of their outer components, or ‘discs’, by about a factor of 3 from z = 3 to 1.5, while the inner components or ‘bulges’ stay roughly the same size. This suggests that these systems are growing from the inside out, whilst the bulges or protobulges are in place early in the history of these galaxies. This is also seen to a lesser degree in the growth of single ‘disc-like’ galaxies versus ‘spheroid-like’ galaxies over the same epoch.

[1]  Steward Observatory,et al.  The Hawk-I UDS and GOODS Survey (HUGS): Survey design and deep K-band number counts , 2014, 1409.7082.

[2]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[3]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Passively Evolving Early-Type Galaxies at 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 2.5 in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field , 2005, astro-ph/0503102.

[4]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS OF GALAXIES IN CANDELS , 2012, 1211.6954.

[5]  Dependence of Galaxy Structure on Rest-Frame Wavelength and Galaxy Type* , 2006, astro-ph/0612558.

[6]  Marijn Franx,et al.  THE SIZE EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES SINCE Z ∼ 3: COMBINING SDSS, GEMS AND FIRES 1 , 2006 .

[7]  Mark Dickinson,et al.  Size Evolution of the Most Massive Galaxies at 1.7 < z < 3 from GOODS NICMOS Survey Imaging , 2008, 0807.4141.

[8]  H. Rix,et al.  THE MAJORITY OF COMPACT MASSIVE GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 ARE DISK DOMINATED , 2011, 1101.2423.

[9]  Tucson,et al.  THE RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF COMPACT AND NORMAL MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES AND ITS EVOLUTION FROM REDSHIFT z ∼ 2 TO THE PRESENT , 2011, 1106.4308.

[10]  C. Conselice,et al.  Strong size evolution of the most massive galaxies since z~2 , 2007, 0709.0621.

[11]  C. Conselice,et al.  The structures of distant galaxies – I. Galaxy structures and the merger rate to z∼ 3 in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field , 2007, 0711.2333.

[12]  Casey Papovich,et al.  The Luminosity, Stellar Mass, and Number Density Evolution of Field Galaxies of Known Morphology from z = 0.5 to 3 , 2004, astro-ph/0405001.

[13]  C. Conselice,et al.  Studying the emergence of the red sequence through galaxy clustering: host halo masses at z > 2 , 2013, 1303.0816.

[14]  M. Cirasuolo,et al.  The Morphologies of Massive Galaxies at 1, 2012, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[15]  A. Fontana,et al.  CANDELS MULTIWAVELENGTH CATALOGS: SOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND PHOTOMETRY IN THE CANDELS UKIDSS ULTRA-DEEP SURVEY FIELD , 2013, 1305.1823.

[16]  G. Chabrier Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.

[17]  J. Trump,et al.  CANDELS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS: SCHEME, DATA RELEASE, AND FIRST RESULTS , 2014, 1401.2455.

[18]  C. Conselice,et al.  The link between morphology and structure of brightest cluster galaxies: automatic identification of cDs , 2015, 1501.06352.

[19]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.

[20]  A. Fontana,et al.  Deconstructing the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function with UKIDSS and CANDELS: The Impact of Colour, Structure and Environment , 2014, 1411.3339.

[21]  M. Franx,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Imaging of Red and Blue Galaxies at z ~ 2.5: A Correlation between Size and Star Formation Activity from Compact Quiescent Galaxies to Extended Star-forming Galaxies , 2007, 0707.4484.

[22]  R. Davé,et al.  The Redshift and Mass Dependence on the Formation of The Hubble Sequence at z>1 from CANDELS/UDS , 2013, 1305.2204.

[23]  Luc Simard,et al.  A CATALOG OF BULGE+DISK DECOMPOSITIONS AND UPDATED PHOTOMETRY FOR 1.12 MILLION GALAXIES IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2011, 1107.1518.

[24]  Douglas Scott,et al.  The Hubble Space Telescope GOODS NICMOS Survey: Overview and the Evolution of Massive Galaxies at 1.5 < z < 3 , 2010, 1010.1164.

[25]  Carlos Hoyos,et al.  THE STRUCTURES AND TOTAL (MINOR + MAJOR) MERGER HISTORIES OF MASSIVE GALAXIES UP TO z ∼ 3 IN THE HST GOODS NICMOS SURVEY: A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE SIZE EVOLUTION PROBLEM , 2011, 1111.5662.

[26]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  GALAPAGOS: From Pixels to Parameters , 2012, 1203.1831.

[27]  D. Wake,et al.  3D-HST+CANDELS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY SIZE–MASS DISTRIBUTION SINCE z = 3 , 2014, 1404.2844.

[28]  Casey Papovich,et al.  A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3 , 2003 .

[29]  Jose Luis. Sersic,et al.  Atlas de Galaxias Australes , 1968 .

[30]  Christian Wolf,et al.  A new automatic method to identify galaxy mergers – I. Description and application to the Space Telescope A901/902 Galaxy Evolution Survey★ , 2011, 1109.6828.

[31]  S. Wuyts,et al.  DENSE CORES IN GALAXIES OUT TO z = 2.5 IN SDSS, UltraVISTA, AND THE FIVE 3D-HST/CANDELS FIELDS , 2014, 1404.4874.

[32]  S. Bamford,et al.  Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): mass–size relations of z < 0.1 galaxies subdivided by Sérsic index, colour and morphology , 2014, 1411.6355.

[33]  K. Jahnke,et al.  FERENGI: Redshifting Galaxies from SDSS to GEMS, STAGES, and COSMOS , 2008, 0812.1022.

[34]  Henry C. Ferguson,et al.  The size evolution of high-redshift galaxies , 2004 .

[35]  L. Ho,et al.  Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.

[36]  Paolo Coppi,et al.  EAZY: A Fast, Public Photometric Redshift Code , 2008, 0807.1533.

[37]  R. Davé,et al.  SEDS: THE SPITZER EXTENDED DEEP SURVEY. SURVEY DESIGN, PHOTOMETRY, AND DEEP IRAC SOURCE COUNTS , 2013 .

[38]  D. Wake,et al.  THE GROWTH OF MASSIVE GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 , 2009, 0912.0514.

[39]  H. Ferguson,et al.  BULGE GROWTH AND QUENCHING SINCE z = 2.5 IN CANDELS/3D-HST , 2014, 1402.0866.

[40]  Simon P. Driver,et al.  A Concise Reference to (Projected) Sérsic R 1/n Quantities, Including Concentration, Profile Slopes, Petrosian Indices, and Kron Magnitudes , 2005, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[41]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3754.

[42]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[43]  G. Bruzual,et al.  Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.

[44]  H. Ferguson,et al.  The HST/ACS Coma Cluster Survey – III. Structural parameters of galaxies using single Sérsic fits , 2010, 1010.2352.

[45]  P. Schechter An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies , 1976 .

[46]  Gemini K-band NIRI Adaptive Optics Observations of massive galaxies at 1 < z < 2 , 2010, 1003.1956.

[47]  Carnegie,et al.  CANDELS: THE PROGENITORS OF COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2012, 1206.5000.