Characterization of uncertainty contributions in a high-accuracy PMU validation system

Abstract The effective deployment of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) in Distribution Networks (DNs) requires an enhancement in terms of estimation accuracy beyond the limits of IEEE Std C37.118.1 (IEEE Std), aiming at a Total Vector Error (TVE) in the order of 0.0x% in steady-state test conditions. As a consequence, a rigorous metrological characterization of PMU performance requires a validation system whose accuracy is at least one order of magnitude better than the one of the device under test, i.e. it requires a TVE in the order of 0.00x% in steady-state test conditions and 0.0x% in distorted or dynamic test conditions. In this paper, we consider the hardware and software architecture of a previously published PMU validation system specifically designed for PMUs operating in DNs. In this context, we evaluate the quality of the generated test waveforms, and we carry out a thorough metrological characterization of the uncertainty contributions due to generation, acquisition and synchronization stages. In this sense, the proposed analysis provides a rigorous methodology for the evaluation of such low uncertainty levels, and enables us to identify and discuss the most challenging aspects in the implementation of a high-accuracy PMU validation system.

[1]  Pankaj Gupta,et al.  Active ROCOF Relay for Islanding Detection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  Guglielmo Frigo,et al.  Definition and assessment of reference values for PMU calibration in static and transient conditions , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).

[3]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1934, Microbial pathogenesis.

[4]  Mario Paolone,et al.  Real-time state estimation of the EPFL-campus medium-voltage grid by using PMUs , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[5]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[6]  Dario Petri,et al.  Synchrophasor Estimators Accuracy: A Comparative Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[8]  M. Paolone,et al.  Synchronized phasors monitoring during the islanding maneuver of an active distribution network , 2010, 2010 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT).

[9]  Mario Paolone,et al.  Architecture and characterization of a calibrator for PMUs operating in power distribution systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[10]  Guglielmo Frigo,et al.  Definition of Accurate Reference Synchrophasors for Static and Dynamic Characterization of PMUs , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Phasor measurement units and wide area monitoring systems , 2016 .

[12]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[13]  Mario Paolone,et al.  Architecture and Experimental Validation of a Low-Latency Phasor Data Concentrator , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Javier Oscar Fernandez The Virginia Tech Calibration System , 2011 .

[15]  Mladen Kezunovic,et al.  Synchrophasor reference algorithm for PMU Calibration System , 2016, 2016 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D).

[16]  J. Braun,et al.  Reference grade calibrator for the testing of the dynamic behavior of phasor measurement units , 2012, 2012 Conference on Precision electromagnetic Measurements.

[17]  Rado Lapuh,et al.  Evaluation of Agilent 3458A Time Jitter Performance , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[18]  James S. Thorp,et al.  IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems , 1998 .

[19]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Smart Grids and Beyond: Achieving the Full Potential of Electricity Systems , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  Ernest Houtzager,et al.  Calibration of Commercial Test Sets for Non-Conventional Instrument Transformers , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).

[21]  Arne Hejde Nielsen,et al.  DTU PMU laboratory development — Testing and validation , 2010, 2010 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe).

[22]  Mario Paolone,et al.  Enhanced Interpolated-DFT for Synchrophasor Estimation in FPGAs: Theory, Implementation, and Validation of a PMU Prototype , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  G. N. Stenbakken,et al.  Calibration of phasor measurement unit at NIST , 2012, 2012 Conference on Precision electromagnetic Measurements.

[24]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Extended C37.118.1 PMU Algorithms for Joint Tracking of Fundamental and Harmonic Phasors in Stressed Power Systems and Microgrids , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[25]  Paolo Romano DFT-based Synchrophasor Estimation Algorithms and their Integration in Advanced Phasor Measurement Units for the Real-time Monitoring of Active Distribution Networks , 2016 .

[26]  Paolo Attilio Pegoraro,et al.  Uncertainty of Voltage Profile in PMU-Based Distribution System State Estimation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[27]  Gert Rietveld,et al.  Metrological characterization of a PMU calibrator in the 25 Hz to 3 kHz range , 2017, 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech.

[28]  Bruno Trinchera,et al.  Asynchronous phase comparator for characterization of devices and PMU calibrator , 2016, 2016 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2016).

[29]  Carmine Landi,et al.  Medium Voltage Divider Coupled With an Analog Optical Transmission System , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[30]  Carmine Landi,et al.  Industrial Comparator for Smart Grid Sensor Calibration , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[31]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.