Performance Indices for the Evaluation of Microgrippers Precision in Grasping and Releasing Phases

In manipulating and assembly tasks, the gripper plays a fundamental role. Tasks at the microscale are particularly challenging due to the possible effect of unwanted stiction. Many different grasping tools (generally called microgrippers) have been developed and are described in literature. The differences rely on size, shape, exchanged forces with the manipulated parts and working principle depending on the application field. Despite the large number of research and industrial cases, each author has developed different and not comparable procedures and indices to assess the device grasping and releasing performance. Therefore, the paper proposes a formalization of methods and indices for the evaluation of the performance of a generic contact microgripper in terms of precision in grasping and releasing and successful rate. This review could be helpful to support the design or the choice of the most suitable gripper according to the properties of the components to be manipulated, the task requirements and the system constraints (i.e., according to the application requirements). The validity of the proposed methodologies and indices is confirmed by theory and experimental data analysis.

[1]  Giovanni Legnani,et al.  Performance Evaluation Methods for Microgrippers , 2014 .

[2]  Hui Xie,et al.  A vacuum microgripping tool with integrated vibration releasing capability. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[3]  Student Probable Error of a Correlation Coefficient , 1908 .

[4]  Michaël Gauthier,et al.  Robotic micro-assembly of microparts using a piezogripper , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Jang Min Park,et al.  A hybrid-type micro-gripper with an integrated force sensor , 2003 .

[6]  Glen McPherson,et al.  Statistics in Scientific Investigation: Its Basis, Application, and Interpretation , 1990 .

[7]  Yu Sun,et al.  Autonomous Robotic Pick-and-Place of Microobjects , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  Giovanni Legnani,et al.  A mini work-cell for handling and assembling microcomponents , 2014 .

[9]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Benchmarking in Manipulation Research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley Object and Model Set , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[10]  Cédric Clévy,et al.  Comparison between micro-objects manipulations in dry and liquid mediums , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Giovanni Legnani,et al.  Unconventional calibration strategies for micromanipulation work-cells , 2018, Robotica.

[12]  Micha l Gauthier,et al.  Toward a Precise Micromanipulation , 2010 .

[13]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Active Release of Microobjects Using a MEMS Microgripper to Overcome Adhesion Forces , 2009, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[14]  Irene Fassi,et al.  Introduction to Miniaturisation , 2017 .

[15]  Huang Xinhan,et al.  Research on vacuum gripper based on fuzzy control for micromanipulators , 2005 .

[16]  Giovanni Legnani,et al.  Precision Handling of Electronic Components for PCB Rework , 2014, IPAS.

[17]  Weibin Rong,et al.  A hybrid-type electrostatically driven microgripper with an integrated vacuum tool , 2010 .

[18]  Zhaowei Zhong,et al.  A microgripper using piezoelectric actuation for micro-object manipulation , 2007 .

[19]  Nicola Pio Belfiore,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey on Microgrippers Design: Mechanical Structure , 2017 .

[20]  Nicola Pio Belfiore,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey on Microgrippers Design: Operational Strategy , 2017 .

[21]  Gualtiero Fantoni,et al.  A self-centering electrostatic microgripper , 2008 .

[22]  Giovanni Legnani,et al.  Handling and Manipulation of Microcomponents: Work-Cell Design and Preliminary Experiments , 2012, IPAS.