Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention.

OBJECTIVES To update the complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), including management and prevention based on technological evolution. METHODS Based on a MEDLINE search from 1989 to 2005, the 2003 results of quality management of Baden-Württemberg, and long-term personal experience at three German centers, the incidence of complications after TURP was analyzed for three subsequent periods: early (1979-1994); intermediate (1994-1999); and recent (2000-2005) with recommendations for management and prevention. RESULTS Technological improvements such as microprocessor-controlled units, better armamentarium such as video TUR, and training helped to reduce perioperative complications (recent vs. early) such as transfusion rate (0.4% vs. 7.1%), TUR syndrome (0.0% vs. 1.1%), clot retention (2% vs. 5%), and urinary tract infection (1.7% vs. 8.2%). Urinary retention (3% vs. 9%) is generally attributed to primary detrusor failure rather than to incomplete resection. Early urge incontinence occurs in up to 30-40% of patients; however, late iatrogenic stress incontinence is rare (<0.5%). Despite an increasing age (55% of patients are older than 70), the associated morbidity of TURP maintained at a low level (<1%) with a mortality rate of 0-0.25%. The major late complications are urethral strictures (2.2-9.8%) and bladder neck contractures (0.3-9.2%). The retreatment rate range is 3-14.5% after five years. CONCLUSIONS TURP still represents the gold standard for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia with decreasing complication rates. Technological alternatives such as bipolar and laser treatments may further minimize the risks of this technically difficult procedure.

[1]  W. Hübner,et al.  Treatment of incontinence after prostatectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy , 2005, BJU international.

[2]  M. Singh,et al.  Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate--a possible alternative to transurethral resection: a one-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. , 1998, British journal of urology.

[3]  U. Zwergel Benignes Prostatahyperplasie-(BPH-)Syndrom , 2001 .

[4]  U. Treiber,et al.  [Transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia. current developments]. , 2005, Der Urologe. Ausg. A.

[5]  Xu Zi-li Transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia , 2005 .

[6]  M. Marberger,et al.  Urodynamic assessment of patients with acute urinary retention: is treatment failure after prostatectomy predictable? , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[7]  R. Hartung,et al.  Coagulating Intermittent Cutting , 2001, European Urology.

[8]  J. Kabalin,et al.  Holmium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 1-year followup. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[9]  P. Schramek,et al.  Blutverlust und Einschwemmung bei TURP vs. TUVRP unter Niederdruck- bzw. Hochdruckbedingungen , 2003, Der Urologe, Ausgabe A.

[10]  T. Soygür,et al.  Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2001, Journal of endourology.

[11]  J H Wasson,et al.  A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  W. Horninger,et al.  Transurethral prostatectomy: Mortality and morbidity , 1996, The Prostate.

[13]  J. Cercueil,et al.  Arterial embolization for massive hematuria following transurethral prostatectomy. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[14]  G. Muto,et al.  Transurethral Electrovaporization of the Prostate vs. Transurethral Resection , 1998, European Urology.

[15]  A. Westenberg,et al.  Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term followup. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Iglesias Jj,et al.  [The new iglesias resectoscope (author's transl)]. , 1975 .

[17]  J. Roberts,et al.  Immediate and postoperative complications of transurethral prostatectomy in the 1990s. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[18]  A. Costello,et al.  Side-Firing Neodymium:YAG Laser Prostatectomy , 1999, European Urology.

[19]  R. Hartung,et al.  Transurethrale Resektion bei benigner Prostatahyperplasie , 2005, Der Urologe, Ausgabe A.

[20]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate , 1999, European Urology.

[21]  U. Zwergel Benignes Prostatahyperplasie-(BPH)-Syndrom Operative und interventionelle Therapieoptionen , 2001, Der Urologe A.

[22]  T. Ryan,et al.  Prostate heating patterns comparing electrosurgical transurethral resection and vaporization: a prospective randomized study. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[23]  Heidler Frequency and causes of fluid absorption: a comparison of three techniques for resection of the prostate under continuous pressure monitoring , 1999, BJU international.

[24]  B. Wullich,et al.  Long-Term Results following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate , 1998, European Urology.

[25]  P. Alken,et al.  Rotoresect: new technique for resection of the prostate: experimental phase. , 1996, Journal of endourology.

[26]  Marberger,et al.  Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? , 1999, BJU international.

[27]  G. Moutzouris,et al.  Incontinence after Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy: The Case for Complex Approach and Treatment , 1998, European Urology.

[28]  L. W. Jones,et al.  Physiologic low pressure irrigation for transurethral resection: suprapubic trocar drainage. , 1974, The Journal of urology.

[29]  Harbans Singh,et al.  Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[30]  J. Lucet,et al.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Bacteriuria after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate , 2001, European Urology.

[31]  R. Hartung,et al.  Die transurethrale Elektroresektion der Prostata , 2002 .

[32]  P. Alken,et al.  The Vista system: a new bipolar resection device for endourological procedures: comparison with conventional resectoscope. , 2004, European urology.

[33]  S. Madersbacher,et al.  Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases. , 2005, European urology.

[34]  S. Ahyai,et al.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[35]  A T Cockett,et al.  Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[36]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Safer transurethral resection of the prostate: coagulating intermittent cutting reduces hemostatic complications. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[37]  P. Faul Video-TUR: raising the golden standard. , 1994, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[38]  David M. Weiner Steven A. Kaplan Alternative Instrumental Treatments in BPH , 1999 .

[39]  A. Rauss,et al.  Infection after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Variation among Centers and Correlation with a Long-Lasting Surgical Procedure , 1998, European Urology.

[40]  A. Flood,et al.  Mortality, morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[41]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Five‐year data from the Oxford Laser Prostatectomy Trial , 2000, BJU international.

[42]  R. Hartung,et al.  [Coagulating intermittent cutting. Improved high-frequency surgery in transurethral prostatectomy]. , 2001, Der Urologe. Ausg. A.

[43]  P. Faul Video TUR: raising the gold standard. New aspects, techniques and tendencies to minimize invasiveness. , 1993, European urology.

[44]  A. Galosi,et al.  Safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate glands up to 150 ml: a prospective comparative study with 1 year of followup. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[45]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Transurethral prostatectomy , 1994 .

[46]  A. Westenberg,et al.  A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams). , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[47]  F. Millán-Rodríguez,et al.  Treatment of bladder stones without associated prostate surgery: results of a prospective study. , 2005, Urology.

[48]  M. Marberger,et al.  Two–Year Results of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate versus Four ‘Less Invasive’ Treatment Options , 2000, European Urology.

[49]  R. Santucci,et al.  Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications , 2005, BJU international.

[50]  T. Senge,et al.  Transurethral resection of the prostate with microprocessor controlled electrosurgical unit. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[51]  F. Altunrende,et al.  A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[52]  Mark Emberton,et al.  EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). , 2004, European urology.

[53]  O. Reich,et al.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: the basel experience after 108 procedures. , 2005, European urology.