Must/need, may/can and the scope of the modal auxiliary

This article argues that the logical paraphrases used to describe the meanings of must, need, may, and can obscure the natural-language semantic interaction between these verbs and negation. The purported non-negatability of must is argued to be an illusion created by the indicative-mood paraphrase ‘is necessary’, which treats the necessity as a reality rather than a non-reality. It is proposed that negation coalesces with the modality that must itself expresses to produce a negatively-charged version of must’s modality: the subject of musn’t is represented as being in a state of constraint in which the only possibility open to the subject is oriented in the opposite direction to the realization of the infinitive’s event. The study also constitutes an argument against a lexicalization analysis: in the combination mustn’t, must and not each contribute their own meaning to the resultant sense, but according to their conceptual status as inherently irrealis notions.

[1]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  J. Fodor,et al.  Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong , 1998 .

[3]  G. Tottie.  The Negation of Epistemic Necessity in Present-Day British and American English , 1985 .

[4]  Need and dare: The black sheep of the modal family , 1994 .

[5]  Rodney Huddleston,et al.  Some theoretical issues in the description of the english verb , 1976 .

[6]  Svatava Spurná,et al.  Negation in English , 2008 .

[7]  R. Hudson.  The Meaning of Questions. , 1975 .

[8]  F. Palmer,et al.  Mood and modality , 1986 .

[9]  Eve Sweetser.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Subject index , 1990 .

[10]  Ljuba N. Veselinova.  The negative existential cycle viewed through the lens of comparative data , 2016 .

[11]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[12]  Susan Reed,et al.  Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility1 , 2011, English Language and Linguistics.

[13]  J. Coates.  The semantics of the modal auxiliaries , 1983 .

[14]  Walter Hirtle.  DO auxiliary — A meaningful support and operator☆ , 1997 .

[15]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The evolution of negation , 1991, Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  W. RonaldLangacker.  HOW TO BUILD AN ENGLISH CLAUSE , 2015 .

[17]  Ilse Depraetere,et al.  Modals and lexically-regulated saturation , 2014 .

[18]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  The Form and Meaning of the English Auxiliary. , 1978 .

[19]  D. Cruse,et al.  Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics , 2000 .

[20]  Jacob Hoeksema,et al.  On the natural history of negative polarity items , 2012 .

[21]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics , 1990 .

[22]  E. Traugott,et al.  Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence from ought to , 1997, English Language and Linguistics.

[23]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[24]  Laurence R. Horn.  The Singular Square: Contrariety and Double Negation from Aristotle to Homer , 2017 .

[25]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[26]  B. Jacobsson.  Modality and the modals of necessity must and have to , 1979 .

[27]  G. Pullum,et al.  CLITICIZATION VS. INFLECTION: ENGLISH N'T , 1983 .

[28]  Walter Hirtle,et al.  MAY, CAN and the expression of permission , 1981 .

[29]  Eve Sweetser.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: List of abbreviations , 1990 .

[30]  Patrick Duffley,et al.  The English infinitive , 1993 .

[31]  R. Huddleston.  Introduction to the Grammar of English: Verbs, nouns and adjectives: the boundaries between them , 1984 .

[32]  Anke von Bergen,et al.  Negative Polarität im Englischen , 1993 .

[33]  Dwight Bolinger.  Extrinsic possibility and intrinsic potentiality: 7 on may and can + 1 , 1989 .

[34]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[35]  Francis James,et al.  Semantics of the English subjunctive , 1986 .

[36]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  A History of English Syntax , 1971 .

[37]  H. Paul.  Deutsches Wörterbuch: Bedeutungsgeschichte und Aufbau unseres Wortschatzes , 2010 .

[38]  Johan van der Auwera,et al.  On the typology of negative modals , 2001 .

[39]  Wim van der Wurff,et al.  A brief history of English syntax (accepted) , 2017 .

[40]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .