Citizen Sensors for SHM: Use of Accelerometer Data from Smartphones

Ubiquitous smartphones have created a significant opportunity to form a low-cost wireless Citizen Sensor network and produce big data for monitoring structural integrity and safety under operational and extreme loads. Such data are particularly useful for rapid assessment of structural damage in a large urban setting after a major event such as an earthquake. This study explores the utilization of smartphone accelerometers for measuring structural vibration, from which structural health and post-event damage can be diagnosed. Widely available smartphones are tested under sinusoidal wave excitations with frequencies in the range relevant to civil engineering structures. Large-scale seismic shaking table tests, observing input ground motion and response of a structural model, are carried out to evaluate the accuracy of smartphone accelerometers under operational, white-noise and earthquake excitations of different intensity. Finally, the smartphone accelerometers are tested on a dynamically loaded bridge. The extensive experiments show satisfactory agreements between the reference and smartphone sensor measurements in both time and frequency domains, demonstrating the capability of the smartphone sensors to measure structural responses ranging from low-amplitude ambient vibration to high-amplitude seismic response. Encouraged by the results of this study, the authors are developing a citizen-engaging and data-analytics crowdsourcing platform towards a smartphone-based Citizen Sensor network for structural health monitoring and post-event damage assessment applications.

[1]  R. Baker.  All shook up , 1990, Nature.

[2]  Hans Christian von Baeyer.  All Shook Up , 1998 .

[3]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[4]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[5]  C. Narain.  Did you feel that? , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Nathan Johnson,et al.  Large-scale experimental and analytical seismic studies of a two-span reinforced concrete bridge system , 2006 .

[7]  Ying Lei,et al.  Identification, Model Updating, and Response Prediction of an Instrumented 15-Story Steel-Frame Building , 2006 .

[8]  Dae-Hyun Kim,et al.  Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring Using a Novel Fiber-Optic Accelerometer System , 2007, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[9]  G. Atkinson,et al.  “Did You Feel It?” Intensity Data: A Surprisingly Good Measure of Earthquake Ground Motion , 2007 .

[10]  Ryan Newton,et al.  The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring , 2008, MobiSys '08.

[11]  Marc O. Eberhard,et al.  Seismic Testing of a Two-Span Reinforced Concrete Bridge , 2008 .

[12]  E. Cochran,et al.  A novel strong-motion seismic network for community participation in earthquake monitoring , 2009, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[13]  Elizabeth S. Cochran,et al.  The Quake-Catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons , 2009 .

[14]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Damage identification study of a seven-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table , 2010 .

[15]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  System identification of a building from multiple seismic records , 2011 .

[16]  E. Cochran,et al.  The Quake-Catcher Network Rapid Aftershock Mobilization Program Following the 2010 M 8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake , 2011 .

[17]  A. Bayen,et al.  iShake: Using Personal Devices to Deliver Rapid Semi- Qualitative Earthquake Shaking Information , 2011 .

[18]  Andreas Krause,et al.  The next big one: Detecting earthquakes and other rare events from community-based sensors , 2011, Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[19]  David J. Wald,et al.  USGS "Did You Feel It?" internet-based macroseismic intensity maps , 2012 .

[20]  E. Cochran,et al.  Comparison between low-cost and traditional MEMS accelerometers: a case study from the M7.1 Darfield, New Zealand, aftershock deployment , 2012 .

[21]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Community Seismic Network , 2012 .

[22]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Mobile Phones as Seismologic Sensors: Automating Data Extraction for the iShake System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[23]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Vision-Based Displacement Sensor for Monitoring Dynamic Response Using Robust Object Search Algorithm , 2010, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[24]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  The community seismic network and quake-catcher network: enabling structural health monitoring through instrumentation by community participants , 2013, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[25]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Evaluating the Reliability of Phones as Seismic Monitoring Instruments , 2014 .

[26]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  SHM‐integrated bridge reliability estimation using multivariate stochastic processes , 2015 .

[27]  Serdar Soyoz,et al.  Vibration-Based Damage Detection and Seismic Performance Assessment of Bridges , 2015 .