Use of neural networks to detect minor and major pathogens that cause bovine mastitis.

The objectives of this research were to test the potential of unsupervised (USNN) and supervised neural network (SNN) models for detecting major and minor mastitis pathogens based on changes in milk parameters. A data set of 4,852 quarter milk samples with records for milk parameters and bacteriological status was used to train and validate the models by classifying milk samples into 3 different bacteriological states: not infected, intramammary infection (IMI) by minor pathogens, and IMI by major pathogens. Sensitivity of the USNN model was 97% for detecting noninfected quarters, 89% for minor pathogen IMI, and 80% for major pathogen IMI. Specificities of USNN models were close to 99% for all bacteriological states. The sensitivity of SNN models was affected by the ratio of infected to noninfected cases in the data set. As the ratio of infected to healthy cases increased from 1:1 to 1:10, detection accuracy for noninfected quarters increased from 82 to 98% but that for minor pathogen IMI decreased from 86 to 44%. The sensitivity for major pathogen IMI was 20% when the ratio was 1:1, but ranged from 20 to 40% when different ratios were tested. The SNN models indicated that somatic cell score and electrical resistance index had the most discriminating power. It was concluded that both USNN and SNN models were able to effectively differentiate between noninfected quarters and those infected by minor mastitis pathogens, and that the USNN model had a better agreement with results obtained from conventional microbiological methods. These types of models can be used in in-line milking systems to detect the infection status of a quarter and provide the farmer with diagnosing options for managing mastitis.

[1]  G. E. Mitchell,et al.  The relationship between somatic cell count, composition and manufacturing properties of bulk milk. V: Pasteurized milk and skim milk powder , 1989 .

[2]  J. Bartley,et al.  The relationship between somatic cell count, composition and manufacturing properties of bulk mild. IV: Non-protein constituents , 1989 .

[3]  Alfonso Zecconi,et al.  Evaluation of the electrical conductivity of milk as a mastitis indicator , 1998 .

[4]  A. Hope Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. , 2000 .

[5]  J. Jensen,et al.  Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  Sandhya Samarasinghe,et al.  Neural Networks for Applied Sciences and Engineering: From Fundamentals to Complex Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[7]  G. Mcdowell,et al.  Changes in the composition of milk from healthy and mastitic dairy cows during the lactation cycle , 1995 .

[8]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk: ability to predict mastitis status. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  M. Nielen,et al.  Comparison of analysis techniques for on-line detection of clinical mastitis. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  R J Harmon,et al.  Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  G. W. Bodoh,et al.  Variation in Somatic Cell Counts in Dairy Herd Improvement Milk Samples , 1976 .

[12]  M. Nielen,et al.  Detection of subclinical mastitis from on-line milking parlor data. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990 .

[14]  S. Samarasinghe,et al.  On-line detection of mastitis in dairy herds using artificial neural networks , 2005 .

[15]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  The basic ideas in neural networks , 1994, CACM.

[16]  H. Henderson,et al.  Changes in electrical conductivity and somatic cell count between milk fractions from quarters subclinically infected with particular mastitis pathogens , 1998, Journal of Dairy Research.

[17]  S. Lee,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF MASTITIS ON THE QUALITY OF RAW MILK AND CHEESE , 1991 .

[18]  S L Spahr,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk for detection of mastitis. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  C W Heald,et al.  A computerized mastitis decision aid using farm-based records: an artificial neural network approach. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  R. Lacroix,et al.  Investigation into the production and conformation traits associated with clinical mastitis using artificial neural networks. , 2000 .

[21]  B J Kitchen,et al.  Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests , 1981, Journal of Dairy Research.

[22]  R. Lacroix,et al.  NEURAL DETECTION OF MASTITIS FROM DAIRY HERD IMPROVEMENT RECORDS , 1999 .

[23]  Sandhya Samarasinghe,et al.  Neural Networks for Applied Sciences and Engineering , 2006 .

[24]  B. Kitchen,et al.  Mastitis diagnostic tests to estimate mammary gland epithelial cell damage. , 1980, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  G. Shook,et al.  Prediction of mastitis using milk somatic cell count, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and lactose. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  S. Martin,et al.  Veterinary Epidemiologic Research , 2009 .

[27]  R. Lacroix,et al.  EFFECTS OF DATA PREPROCESSING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DAIRY YIELD PREDICTION AND COW CULLING CLASSIFICATION , 1997 .