Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use : a qualitative approach

The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to using CityCycle, a public bicycle share scheme in Brisbane, Australia. Focus groups were conducted with participants belonging to one of three categories. Group one consisted of infrequent and noncyclists (no bicycle riding over the past month), group two were regular bicycle riders (ridden a bicycle at least once in the past month) and group three was composed of CityCycle members. A thematic analytic method was used to analyse the data. Three main themes were found: Accessibility/spontaneity, safety and weather/topography. The lengthy sign-up process was thought to stifle the spontaneity typically thought to attract people to public bike share. Mandatory helmet legislation was thought to reduce spontaneous use. Safety was a major concern for all groups and this included a perceived lack of suitable bicycle infrastructure, as well as regular riders describing a negative attitude of some car drivers. Interestingly, CityCycle riders unanimously perceived car driver attitudes to improve when on CityCycle bicycles relative to riding on personal bicycles. Conclusions: In order to increase the popularity of the CityCycle scheme, the results of this study suggest that a more accessible, spontaneous sign-up process is required, 24/7 opening hours, and greater incentives to sign up new members and casual users, as seeing people using CityCycle appears critical to further take up.

[1]  P. Cox,et al.  Cycling and Society , 2012 .

[2]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Revolutions for women : increasing women`s participation in cycling for recreation and transport , 2006 .

[3]  Bradley Flamm,et al.  Constraints to green vehicle ownership: A focus group study , 2012 .

[4]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Smart card data use in public transit: A literature review , 2011 .

[5]  Elliot K. Fishman Evaluating the benefits of public bicycle schemes needs to be undertaken carefully , 2011 .

[6]  E. Fishman The impacts of public bicycle share schemes on transport choice , 2011 .

[7]  Q. Shen,et al.  Bike-Sharing Systems in Beijing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou and Their Impact on Travel Behavior , 2011 .

[8]  James A. Thomson,et al.  Drivers' perceptions of cyclists , 2002 .

[9]  Ian Walker Road Users' Perceptions of Other Road Users: Do Different Transport Modes Invoke Qualitatively Different Concepts in Observers? , 2005 .

[10]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Cycling down under: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies in Sydney and Melbourne , 2011 .

[11]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  Bicycle helmet research , 2010 .

[12]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Cycling: getting Australia moving: barriers, facilitators and interventions to get more Australians physically active through cycling , 2008 .

[13]  Ian Walker,et al.  Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  D. Rojas-Rueda,et al.  The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[16]  Christopher Flavin,et al.  Vital Signs: The Trends That Are Shaping Our Future , 1992 .

[17]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[18]  Joris Lammers,et al.  Power increases dehumanization , 2011 .