The Balance of Trade Between Disciplines

This study was motivated by the admonition of Professor Hambrick, as president of the Academy of Management, that the field does not “matter” much. One reason for this may be that management scholars have not done a good job of disseminating knowledge to scholars in related fields. The article examines this proposition by assessing the citation patterns between management journals and journals in the related social sciences (citations received and citations sent). Results indicate that management continues to run a significant balance-of-trade deficit with economics, psychology, and sociology. Management exports a significant (but small) amount of knowledge only to psychology, while importing a significant amount from economics, psychology, and sociology. Results indicate that there is much work to be done to improve our management of knowledge, relative to the social sciences.

[1]  R. Pieters,et al.  Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals , 2002 .

[2]  A. Tahai,et al.  A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences , 1999 .

[3]  Galina F. Gordukalova : Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States , 1997 .

[4]  S. Stigler,et al.  The Journals of Economics , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  John Kay,et al.  Foundations Of Corporate Success , 1995 .

[6]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Journal Influence in the Field of Management: An Analysis Using Salancik's Index in a Dependency Network , 1994 .

[7]  D. Hambrick What if the Academy Actually Mattered , 1994 .

[8]  D. Laband,et al.  The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990 , 1994 .

[9]  L. Hargens,et al.  Are sociologists’ publications uncited? Citation rates of journal articles, chapters, and books , 1991 .

[10]  David P. Hamilton Publishing by--and for?--the numbers. , 1990, Science.

[11]  Thomas O. Stair,et al.  Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and deceit in the halls of science , 1985 .

[12]  S. Liebowitz,et al.  Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economic Journals , 1984 .

[13]  N. Mullins,et al.  The Group Structure of Cocitation Clusters: A Comparative Study , 1977 .

[14]  E. J. Barboni,et al.  Co-Citation Analyses of Science: An Evaluation , 1977 .

[15]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[16]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .