Acceptance of calorie-reduced yoghurt: effects of sensory characteristics and product information.

The main objective of this paper was to study acceptance of yoghurt with different levels of two specific sensory attributes, sweetness and richness, when corresponding information about sugar and fat content was given simultaneously with tasting. A conjoint design was applied to examine the effects of intrinsic attributes (sensory) and extrinsic attributes (health information) on acceptability and purchase probability for calorie-reduced vanilla yoghurt. Based on sensory profiling of 12 yoghurts produced according to an experimental design, four yoghurts varying in sweetness and richness were selected. In the conjoint study this sensory variation was combined with information concerning fat content and sugar content. 153 health conscious consumers participated in a blind testing and a conjoint study. Analyses of variance showed that sweetness and information about sugar content had significant effects on liking and purchase probability. The study showed that conjoint methodology was an appropriate tool to reveal effects of extrinsic and intrinsic product attributes.

[1]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Prediction of Consumer Acceptability of Yogurt by Sensory and Analytical Measures of Sweetness and Sourness , 1991 .

[2]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Sensory attributes and acceptance of sucrose and fat in strawberry yoghurts , 2007 .

[3]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[4]  H. Tuorila,et al.  How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread , 1996 .

[5]  Berta Schnettler,et al.  Consumer willingness to pay for beef meat in a developing country : The effect of information regarding country of origin, price and animal handling prior to slaughter , 2009 .

[6]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Effect of Reduced-fat Information on Expected and Actual Hedonic and Sensory Ratings of Sausage , 1998, Appetite.

[7]  Imad Toufeili,et al.  Mapping determinants of purchase intent of concentrated yogurt (Labneh) by conjoint analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Consumer perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional milk desserts. Influence of ingredient, ingredient name and health claim. , 2009 .

[9]  DONALD A. WILLIAMSON,et al.  Perception of Sweetness Intensity Determines Women's Hedonic and other Perceptual Responsiveness to Chocolate Food , 1998, Appetite.

[10]  A. Drewnowski.  Individual differences in sensory preferences for fat in model sweet dairy products. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  The Effect of Multiple Extrinsic Cues on Quality Perceptions: A Matter of Consistency , 2005 .

[12]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yogurt , 1997 .

[13]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Consumer purchase probability of dry fermented lamb sausages , 1998 .

[14]  H. Tuorila,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INFORMATION RELATED TO FAT CONTENT AND TASTE ON CONSUMER RESPONSES TO A REDUCED‐FAT FRANKFURTER AND A REDUCED‐FAT CHOCOLATE BAR , 1999 .

[15]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Response to “Measuring consumer response to food products”. Sensory tests that predict consumer acceptance , 2003 .

[16]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of nutritional knowledge on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods , 2008, Appetite.

[17]  C. S. Slotterback,et al.  What's in a name? A comparison of men's and women's judgements about food names and their nutrient contents , 2001, Appetite.

[18]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Cream and sugar: Human preferences for high-fat foods , 1983, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  Lawrence L. Garber,et al.  Measuring consumer response to food products , 2003 .

[20]  F. Bellisle,et al.  Impact of sex and age on sensory evaluation of sugar and fat in dairy products , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  Carole S. Setser,et al.  PRESENTATION ORDER BIAS IN CONSUMER PREFERENCE STUDIES ON SPONGE CAKES , 1980 .

[22]  K. Grunert.  Purchase and consumption: the interdisciplinary nature of analysing food choice , 2003 .

[23]  J. E. Steiner,et al.  DISCUSSION PAPER: INNATE, DISCRIMINATIVE HUMAN FACIAL EXPRESSIONS TO TASTE AND SMELL STIMULATION , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Sugar and fat: Sensory and hedonic evaluation of liquid and solid foods , 1989, Physiology & Behavior.

[25]  Richard M. Johnson.  Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer Values , 1974 .

[26]  D. R. Peryam,et al.  Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. , 1957 .

[27]  Magni Martens,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Quality : An Introduction , 2001 .

[28]  P. Masi,et al.  Influence of information on origin and technology on the consumer response: The case of soppressata salami , 2006 .

[29]  D. Mela,et al.  The Influences of Attitudes, Beliefs and Label Information on Perceptions of Reduced-fat Spread , 1994, Appetite.

[30]  L. Lähteenmäki,et al.  Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices , 2006, Appetite.

[31]  J. Wardle,et al.  Influence of Relative Fat Content Information on Responses to Three Foods , 1997, Appetite.

[32]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  The effects of information on sensory ratings and preferences: The importance of attitudes , 1991 .

[33]  D. Romano,et al.  Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods : Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story? , 2006 .

[34]  B. Mollet,et al.  Applications of exopolysaccharides in the dairy industry , 2001 .

[35]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Expectations Related to Fat-free and Regular-fat Foods , 1994, Appetite.

[36]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[37]  E. Köster,et al.  Sensory memory and food texture , 2005 .

[38]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  SENSORY ANALYSIS IN MARKETING PRACTICE: COMPARISON AND INTEGRATION , 1995 .

[39]  K. Roininen,et al.  Quantification of Consumer Attitudes to Health and Hedonic Characteristics of Foods , 1999, Appetite.

[40]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  EFFECTS OF DISCONFIRMED CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS ON FOOD ACCEPTABILITY , 1992 .

[41]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods, liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price , 1996 .

[42]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production , 2009, Appetite.

[43]  Rolph E. Anderson.  Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance , 1973 .

[44]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  THE GENERATION OF SENSORY EXPECTATION BY EXTERNAL CUES AND ITS EFFECT ON SENSORY PERCEPTION AND HEDONIC RATINGS: A REVIEW , 1996 .

[45]  O. Maller,et al.  Taste in acceptance of sugars by human infants. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[46]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Consumer responses to reduced and regular fat content in different products: effects of gender, involvement and health concern , 1999 .

[47]  A. Cardello.  Food quality: Relativity, context and consumer expectations , 1995 .

[48]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Uncovering cultural differences in choice behaviour between Samoan and New Zealand consumers: a case study with apples. , 2000 .

[49]  John E. Hayes,et al.  Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[50]  H. Macfie,et al.  DESIGNS TO BALANCE THE EFFECT OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION AND FIRST-ORDER CARRY-OVER EFFECTS IN HALL TESTS , 1989 .

[51]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[52]  H. Heymann,et al.  Hedonic responses to dairy products: effects of fat levels, label information, and risk perception , 1992 .

[53]  Sylvie Issanchou,et al.  Effect of fibre information on consumer willingness to pay for French baguettes , 2009 .

[54]  U. Enneking,et al.  How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision , 2007 .

[55]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Applying the evaluability principle to nutrition table information. How reference information changes people's perception of food products , 2009, Appetite.