A New CT Parameter for Predicting Residual Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: The “Basal Turn–Facial Ridge Angle”

Objectives: We suggest a simple measurement, called the “basal turn–facial ridge (BT–FR) angle,” for determining the electrode insertion axis using preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) to predict hearing preservation (HP) in cochlear implantation (CI). Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Eighty-two ears that underwent CI between 2010 and 2018 were included. Ears with preoperative thresholds less than or equal to 80 dB HL at 125, 250, and 500 Hz were enrolled and grouped using the criteria of Skarżyński et al.: Group 1, complete or partial HP; Group 2, minimal HP or complete hearing loss. Intervention: All subjects underwent CI with soft surgery techniques through the round window approach. Main Outcome Measures: The BT–FR angle is the angle between the basal turn line (BT-line), which is a straight line passing through the center of the longitudinal axis of the BT, and the facial ridge line, which is a straight line running from the endpoint of the BT-line to a point just above the facial ridge. Results: The BT–FR angle was 2.5 ± 2.9 degrees in Group 1 and –0.3 ± 2.7 degrees in Group 2 (p = 0.003). The angle and hearing loss showed a significant negative correlation (r = –0.401, p = 0.002). In multiple linear regression, “age at operation” (β coefficient 0.260; p = 0.001) and the “BT–FR angle” (–1.967; p = 0.001) were significant variables affecting the degree of residual hearing loss. Conclusions: The BT–FR angle, which can be measured simply, may be useful to predict residual HP after CI.

[1]  M. Hansen,et al.  Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials , 2019, Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology.

[2]  M. Yüksel,et al.  Effects of Low Frequency Residual Hearing on Music Perception and Psychoacoustic Abilities in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  O. Choo,et al.  Critical Factors for Binaural Hearing in Children with Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: First Implant Performance and Inter-Implant Interval , 2019, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  H. Skarżyński,et al.  Hearing Preservation With the Use of Flex20 and Flex24 Electrodes in Patients With Partial Deafness , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  O. Choo,et al.  The speech perception after cochlear implantation: The hearing gain difference according to the implant systems is important? , 2019, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[6]  O. Choo,et al.  Round window membrane visibility related to success of hearing preservation in cochlear implantation , 2019, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  J. Roland,et al.  Surgical Experience and Early Outcomes With a Slim Perimodiolar Electrode. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  E. Mylanus,et al.  Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  H. Moteki,et al.  Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes , 2018, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  H. Skarżyński,et al.  Preservation of Hearing Following Cochlear Implantation Using Different Steroid Therapy Regimens: A Prospective Clinical Study , 2018, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[11]  C. Buchman,et al.  Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation , 2018, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  O. Choo,et al.  Steroid intracochlear distribution differs by administration method: Systemic versus intratympanic injection , 2018, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  E. Ferrary,et al.  Cochlear Implant Insertion Axis Into the Basal Turn: A Critical Factor in Electrode Array Translocation. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[14]  Neil S. Patel,et al.  Hearing Preservation in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing , 2017, Hearing Research.

[16]  C. Palmer,et al.  Hearing Preservation: Does Electrode Choice Matter? , 2017, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology , 2016, Hearing Research.

[18]  M. Hansen,et al.  Outcomes of Adolescents With a Short Electrode Cochlear Implant With Preserved Residual Hearing , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  Anh T. Nguyen-Huynh,et al.  Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model , 2015, Hearing Research.

[20]  T. Newman,et al.  A Retrospective Analysis of the Contribution of Reported Factors in Cochlear Implantation on Hearing Preservation Outcomes , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[21]  M. Praetorius,et al.  Variability of an Ideal Insertion Vector for Cochlear Implantation , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  D. Mawman,et al.  Straight Versus Modiolar Hugging Electrodes: Does One Perform Better Than the Other? , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[23]  R. Lang-Roth,et al.  Young Age Is a Positive Prognostic Factor for Residual Hearing Preservation in Conventional Cochlear Implantation , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  A. Sampaio,et al.  Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Surgery , 2014, International journal of otolaryngology.

[25]  J. Oleson,et al.  Risk Factors for Loss of Ipsilateral Residual Hearing After Hybrid Cochlear Implantation , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[26]  H. Skarżyńśki Long-term results of partial deafness treatment , 2014, Cochlear implants international.

[27]  A. Rivas,et al.  Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system , 2013, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[28]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Cochlear Implantation With Hearing Preservation Yields Significant Benefit for Speech Recognition in Complex Listening Environments , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[29]  G. Rajan,et al.  The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: A prospective clinical study , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[30]  H. Skarżyński,et al.  Analysis of Factors Affecting Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation , 2010, Cochlear implants international.

[31]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[32]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Comparison of Speech Recognition and Localization Performance in Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Matched on Duration of Deafness and Age at Implantation , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[33]  C. G. Wright,et al.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: The Round Window Revisited , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[34]  Antje Aschendorff,et al.  The Nucleus Contour Electrode Array: A Radiological and Histological Study , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[35]  E Lehnhardt,et al.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique]. , 1993, HNO.