Does partial difficult search help difficult search?

Olds, Cowan, and Jolicoeur (2000a, 2000b) showed that exposure to a display that affordspop-out search (a target among distractors of only one color) can assist processing of a related display that requiresdifficult search. They added distractors of an additional color to the initial simple display and analyzed response time distributions to show that exposure to the initial display aided subsequent search in the difficult portion (this finding was calledsearch assistance). To test whether search assistance depends on perceptual grouping of the initial items, we presented initial items that were more difficult to group (two colors of distractors, instead of just one). The target appeared (on 50% of the trials) among distractors of two colors, and then after a delay, more distractors of those two colors were added to the display. Exposure to the initial easier portion of the display did not assist processing of the second portion of the display when the initial display contained a large number of items; we found tentative evidence for assistance with small numbers of initial items. In the Olds et al. (2000a, 2000b) studies, it was easy to group the initial distractor items, because they were all the same color. In contrast, in the present study, it was difficult to group the heterogeneous initial distractor items. Search assistance is found only when initial item grouping is relatively easy, and thus we conclude that search assistance depends on grouping.

[1]  R. Rosenholtz.  A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena , 1999, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[3]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Elizabeth S. Olds,et al.  Tracking visual search over space and time , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search , 1998 .

[6]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[7]  The decay and interruption of interactions between search mechanisms , 2002, Vision Research.

[8]  Martin Arguin,et al.  Conjunction and linear non-separability effects in visual shape encoding , 2000, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[11]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  William B. Cowan,et al.  Convex hull test of the linear separability hypothesis in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[13]  William B. Cowan,et al.  Effective color CRT calibration techniques for perception research , 1999 .

[14]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[19]  R. Klein,et al.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[20]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Situating vision in the world , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Elizabeth S. Olds,et al.  Stimulus-determined discrimination mechanisms for color search , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  J. Palmer.  Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[26]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  In Search of Remembrance: Evidence for Memory in Visual Search , 2000, Psychological science.

[27]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[29]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[30]  S. Palmer.  Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[31]  W. Cowan,et al.  Interactions between search mechanisms in conjunction search. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[32]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[33]  Elizabeth S. Olds,et al.  The time-course of pop-out search , 2000, Vision Research.