Optimal control for an elliptic system with convex polygonal control constraints

In recent years, optimal control problems governed by partial differential equations with pointwise constraints on the controls have received a considerable amount of attention. The challenge consists in finding efficient numerical methods in spite of the nonsmoothness introduced by pointwise inequality constraints. Most investigations so far have considered the case of scalar-valued control with simple constraints (e.g. unilateral or bilateral constraints). For vector-valued controls, which appear, for example, in the context of the Navier–Stokes equations, the constraints that were investigated were of a box type. For scalar-valued controls with unilateral or bilateral constraints, the numerical realization of optimal control problems can advantageously be performed with the semismooth Newton method or, equivalently, by the primal–dual active set method. We refer to Hintermuller et al. (2003), Ito & Kunisch (2004), De Los Reyes & Kunisch (2005), Hintermuller & Hinze (2006), Ito & Kunisch (2008) and Ulbrich (2011) and the references cited therein. An alternative approach is based on interior point methods. They were analysed, for example, in Schiela & Weiser (2008) and Weiser et al. (2008). The semismooth Newton method is different from penalty—or barrier—function methods which rely on penalty—or barrier— parameters, respectively. It was proven to be locally superlinearly convergent, and for unilaterally constrained problems to be globally convergent; cf. Hintermuller et al. (2003). For vector-valued controls, there are only a few papers that deal with the case of general convex control constraints. In Wachsmuth (2006a,b) and Wachsmuth (2007), the first-order necessary and the second-order sufficient optimality conditions for general convex constraints are obtained. In Wachsmuth (2006b), a numerical procedure is proposed which, however, does not concretely exploit the structure of

[1]  Michael Ulbrich,et al.  Semismooth Newton Methods for Operator Equations in Function Spaces , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[2]  Michael Hintermüller,et al.  A SQP-Semismooth Newton-type Algorithm applied to Control of the instationary Navier--Stokes System Subject to Control Constraints , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  Daniel Wachsmuth Numerical Solution of Optimal Control Problems with Convex Control Constraints , 2006, Systems, Control, Modeling and Optimization.

[4]  Kazufumi Ito,et al.  The primal-dual active set strategy as a semi-smooth Newton method for quadratic problems with affine constraints , 2002 .

[5]  UlbrichMichael Semismooth Newton Methods for Operator Equations in Function Spaces , 2002 .

[6]  Martin Weiser,et al.  Konrad-zuse-zentrum F ¨ Ur Informationstechnik Berlin a Control Reduced Primal Interior Point Method for Pde Constrained Optimization a Control Reduced Primal Interior Point Method for Pde Constrained Optimization † , 2022 .

[7]  V. Barbu,et al.  Convexity and optimization in banach spaces , 1972 .

[8]  Arnd Rösch,et al.  Superconvergence Properties of Optimal Control Problems , 2004, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[9]  David G. Luenberger,et al.  Linear and nonlinear programming , 1984 .

[10]  S. Scholtes Introduction to Piecewise Differentiable Equations , 2012 .

[11]  Boris Vexler,et al.  Adaptive Finite Elements for Elliptic Optimization Problems with Control Constraints , 2008, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[12]  G. Burton Sobolev Spaces , 2013 .

[13]  Daniel Wachsmuth Sufficient second-order optimality conditions for convex control constraints , 2006 .

[14]  Kazufumi Ito,et al.  The Primal-Dual Active Set Method for Nonlinear Optimal Control Problems with Bilateral Constraints , 2004, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[15]  Xiaojun Chen,et al.  Smoothing Methods and Semismooth Methods for Nondifferentiable Operator Equations , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[16]  Karl Kunisch,et al.  Optimal control for elliptic systems with pointwise euclidean norm constraints on the controls , 2013, Math. Program..

[17]  J. Zowe,et al.  Regularity and stability for the mathematical programming problem in Banach spaces , 1979 .

[18]  Kazufumi Ito,et al.  The Primal-Dual Active Set Strategy as a Semismooth Newton Method , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[19]  K. Malanowski Convergence of approximations vs. regularity of solutions for convex, control-constrained optimal-control problems , 1982 .

[20]  Daniel Wachsmuth Optimal Control Problems with Convex Control Constraints , 2007 .

[21]  Michael Hinze,et al.  A Variational Discretization Concept in Control Constrained Optimization: The Linear-Quadratic Case , 2005, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[22]  Kazufumi Ito,et al.  Lagrange multiplier approach to variational problems and applications , 2008, Advances in design and control.

[23]  Martin Weiser,et al.  Superlinear convergence of the control reduced interior point method for PDE constrained optimization , 2008, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[24]  K. Kunisch,et al.  A semi-smooth Newton method for control constrained boundary optimal control of the Navier–Stokes equations , 2005 .

[25]  I. Ekeland,et al.  Convex analysis and variational problems , 1976 .

[26]  Lu Xiliang OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR AN ELLIPTIC SYSTEM WITH POINTWISE NONLINEAR CONTROL CONSTRAINTS , 2010 .

[27]  Michael Ulbrich,et al.  Semismooth Newton Methods for Variational Inequalities and Constrained Optimization Problems in Function Spaces , 2011, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization.

[28]  W. D. Evans,et al.  PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1941 .