Exploring different community attitudes to sustainable technologies

The adoption of sustainable technologies to mitigate high energy use by home owners has not been extensive. As a result of legislation there are a number of initiatives to help resolve this situation, some which recognise that communities could be a good site of influence to effect this change. Communities have different socio-economic backgrounds, which may constrain their choices. This affects their attitudes to sustainable technologies, and how they might go about adopting them. This paper refers to pilot research studying attitudes in two socioeconomically different communities in Birmingham, aiming to inform a larger study about successful interventions. These communities underwent the adoption of sustainable technologies via different interventions, here defined as an identifiable activity bringing sustainable energy technologies into an area. The interviewees presented a positive attitude to the intervention in their area, but displayed a difference in their perception of a sense of community. Socio-economic data raises important questions about a community’s capability to intervene which was supported by the interviewees. The pilot suggests that interventions can enable interactions which allow positive information transfer necessary for increasing acceptability of sustainable technologies, which will be explored in the larger study.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[2]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[3]  Simon Guy,et al.  The Sociology of Energy, Buildings and the Environment: Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice , 2001 .

[4]  A. Krishna.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/pad.280 PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANISATIONS: EXPLORING THE SCOPE FOR SYNERGY , 2022 .

[5]  F. Geels.  Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[6]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  What governs the transition to a sustainable hydrogen economy? Articulating the relationship between technologies and political institutions , 2006 .

[7]  S. Shortall.  Social or Economic Goals, Civic Inclusion or Exclusion? An Analysis of Rural Development Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[8]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[9]  C. Upton.  "Custom" and contestation: land reform in post-socialist Mongolia. , 2009 .

[10]  J L Kelsey,et al.  The measurement of social class in epidemiology. , 1988, Epidemiologic reviews.

[11]  A. Wals.  Reviews , 2007 .

[12]  P Ekins,et al.  Human Choice and Climate Change, Volumes 1-4 - Rayner, S. & Malone, E. Eds., Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio (Review) , 1999 .

[13]  Sally Shortall,et al.  Are Rural Development Programmes Socially Inclusive? Social Inclusion, Civic Engagement, Participation, and Social Capital: Exploring the Differences. , 2008 .

[14]  C. Gibson,et al.  Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia , 2007 .

[15]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[17]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[18]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  “'S Leinn Fhèin Am Fearann” (The Land is Ours): Re-Claiming Land, Re-Creating Community, North Harris, Outer Hebrides, Scotland , 2006 .

[19]  Tony Blackshaw,et al.  The Symbolic Construction of Community , 2010 .

[20]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[21]  Marilyn. Taylor,et al.  Partnerships and power in community regeneration , 2001, Partnership Working.

[22]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[23]  Mark Shucksmith,et al.  Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: perspectives from leader in the UK , 2000 .

[24]  Thomas M. Stutzman,et al.  Factors Affecting Energy Consumption: Two Field Tests of the Fishbein-Ajzen Model , 1982 .

[25]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Transition pathways for a low carbon energy system in the UK: assessing the compatibility of large-scale and small-scale options , 2008 .

[26]  R. Bradley,et al.  Socioeconomic status and child development. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[28]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  A working land: crofting communities, place and the politics of the possible in post-Land Reform Scotland1 , 2006 .

[29]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[30]  Graham Ault,et al.  Additional renewable energy growth through small-scale community orientated energy policies , 2005 .