Modeled production, oxidation, and transport processes of wetland methane emissions in temperate, boreal, and Arctic regions

Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere. The eddy covariance method provides robust measurements of net ecosystem exchange of CH4, but interpreting its spatiotemporal variations is challenging due to the co‐occurrence of CH4 production, oxidation, and transport dynamics. Here, we estimate these three processes using a data‐model fusion approach across 25 wetlands in temperate, boreal, and Arctic regions. Our data‐constrained model—iPEACE—reasonably reproduced CH4 emissions at 19 of the 25 sites with normalized root mean square error of 0.59, correlation coefficient of 0.82, and normalized standard deviation of 0.87. Among the three processes, CH4 production appeared to be the most important process, followed by oxidation in explaining inter‐site variations in CH4 emissions. Based on a sensitivity analysis, CH4 emissions were generally more sensitive to decreased water table than to increased gross primary productivity or soil temperature. For periods with leaf area index (LAI) of ≥20% of its annual peak, plant‐mediated transport appeared to be the major pathway for CH4 transport. Contributions from ebullition and diffusion were relatively high during low LAI (<20%) periods. The lag time between CH4 production and CH4 emissions tended to be short in fen sites (3 ± 2 days) and long in bog sites (13 ± 10 days). Based on a principal component analysis, we found that parameters for CH4 production, plant‐mediated transport, and diffusion through water explained 77% of the variance in the parameters across the 19 sites, highlighting the importance of these parameters for predicting wetland CH4 emissions across biomes. These processes and associated parameters for CH4 emissions among and within the wetlands provide useful insights for interpreting observed net CH4 fluxes, estimating sensitivities to biophysical variables, and modeling global CH4 fluxes.

[1]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Causality Guided Machine Learning Model on Wetland Ch4 Emissions Across Global Wetlands , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  B. Runkle,et al.  Modification of a Wavelet-Based Method for Detecting Ebullitive Methane Fluxes in Eddy-Covariance Observations: Application at Two Rice Fields , 2022, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[3]  M. Ueyama,et al.  Partitioning methane flux by the eddy covariance method in a cool temperate bog based on a Bayesian framework , 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[4]  Kaoru Irie,et al.  Log-regularly varying scale mixture of normals for robust regression , 2020, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[5]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Plant mediated methane efflux from a boreal peatland complex , 2021, Plant and Soil.

[6]  P. Ciais,et al.  Assessing methane emissions for northern peatlands in ORCHIDEE-PEAT revision 7020 , 2021, Geoscientific Model Development.

[7]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET-CH4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands , 2021, Earth System Science Data.

[8]  G. Vourlitis,et al.  Identifying dominant environmental predictors of freshwater wetland methane fluxes across diurnal to seasonal time scales , 2021, Global change biology.

[9]  W. Oechel,et al.  Substantial hysteresis in emergent temperature sensitivity of global wetland CH4 emissions , 2021, Nature Communications.

[10]  T. Tokida,et al.  Quantifying bubbling emission (ebullition) of methane from a rice paddy using high-time-resolution concentration data obtained during a closed-chamber measurement , 2021, Journal of Agricultural Meteorology.

[11]  Jiquan Chen Biophysical Models and Applications in Ecosystem Analysis , 2021 .

[12]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Ebullition dominates methane fluxes from the water surface across different ecohydrological patches in a temperate freshwater marsh at the end of the growing season. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  J. Canadell,et al.  Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[14]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data , 2020, Scientific Data.

[15]  P. Crill,et al.  Hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH4 fluxes explained by substrate availability and microbial activity , 2020, Biogeosciences.

[16]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Plant‐mediated methane transport in emergent and floating‐leaved species of a temperate freshwater mineral‐soil wetland , 2020, Limnology and Oceanography.

[17]  Y. Ryu,et al.  Comprehensive assessments of carbon dynamics in an intermittently-irrigated rice paddy , 2020 .

[18]  S. Bansal,et al.  Vegetation Affects Timing and Location of Wetland Methane Emissions , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[19]  M. Ueyama,et al.  Environmental controls on methane fluxes in a cool temperate bog , 2020 .

[20]  V. Brovkin,et al.  The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.

[21]  A. Ito Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016 , 2019, Polar Science.

[22]  M. Göckede,et al.  Quantifying the impact of emission outbursts and non-stationary flow on eddy-covariance CH4 flux measurements using wavelet techniques , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[23]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Multi-year methane ebullition measurements from water and bare peat surfaces of a patterned boreal bog , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[24]  R. Grant,et al.  Modeling Climate Change Impacts on an Arctic Polygonal Tundra: 2. Changes in CO2 and CH4 Exchange Depend on Rates of Permafrost Thaw as Affected by Changes in Vegetation and Drainage , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[25]  T. Foken,et al.  Characterisation of short-term extreme methane fluxes related to non-turbulent mixing above an Arctic permafrost ecosystem , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[26]  T. Morin Advances in the Eddy Covariance Approach to CH4 Monitoring Over Two and a Half Decades , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[27]  H. Iwata,et al.  Partitioning Eddy-Covariance Methane Fluxes from a Shallow Lake into Diffusive and Ebullitive Fluxes , 2018, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[28]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Temporal Variation of Ecosystem Scale Methane Emission From a Boreal Fen in Relation to Temperature, Water Table Position, and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes , 2018, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[29]  O. Peltola,et al.  Calibrating the sqHIMMELI v1.0 wetland methane emission model with hierarchical modeling and adaptive MCMC , 2018 .

[30]  S. Knox,et al.  Potential for negative emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) through coastal peatland re-establishment: Novel insights from high frequency flux data at meter and kilometer scales , 2018 .

[31]  V. Brovkin,et al.  HIMMELI v1.0: HelsinkI Model of MEthane buiLd-up and emIssion for peatlands , 2017 .

[32]  Shuang Ma,et al.  Data‐Constrained Projections of Methane Fluxes in a Northern Minnesota Peatland in Response to Elevated CO2 and Warming , 2017 .

[33]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Year-round simulated methane emissions from a permafrost ecosystem in Northeast Siberia , 2017 .

[34]  O. Peltola,et al.  Technical note: Comparison of methane ebullition modelling approaches used in terrestrial wetland models , 2017 .

[35]  W. Silver,et al.  Effects of seasonality, transport pathway, and spatial structure on greenhouse gas fluxes in a restored wetland , 2017, Global change biology.

[36]  L. Merbold,et al.  Plants, microorganisms, and soil temperatures contribute to a decrease in methane fluxes on a drained Arctic floodplain , 2017, Global change biology.

[37]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature , 2017, Nature.

[38]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Identifying scale‐emergent, nonlinear, asynchronous processes of wetland methane exchange , 2016 .

[39]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  CH 4 parameter estimation in CLM4.5bgc using surrogate global optimization , 2015 .

[40]  Dario Papale,et al.  Filling the gaps in meteorological continuous data measured at FLUXNET sites with ERA-Interim reanalysis , 2015 .

[41]  Jed O. Kaplan,et al.  WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia , 2015 .

[42]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere – the state and future of the eddy covariance method , 2014, Global change biology.

[43]  Jeffrey R. White,et al.  A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands , 2014, Global change biology.

[44]  E. Humphreys,et al.  Evidence for a nonmonotonic relationship between ecosystem‐scale peatland methane emissions and water table depth , 2014 .

[45]  G. Jurasinski,et al.  Controls for multi-scale temporal variation in ecosystem methane exchange during the growing season of a permanently inundated fen , 2014 .

[46]  Jiquan Chen,et al.  Net ecosystem methane and carbon dioxide exchanges in a Lake Erie coastal marsh and a nearby cropland , 2014, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[47]  David Bastviken,et al.  Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales , 2014, Nature.

[48]  E. Karofeld,et al.  Spatio‐temporal changes in bog pool bottom topography – temperature effect and its influence on pool development: an example from a raised bog in Estonia , 2014 .

[49]  C. Heppell,et al.  The importance of ebullition as a mechanism of methane (CH4) loss to the atmosphere in a northern peatland , 2013 .

[50]  Qianlai Zhuang,et al.  Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales , 2013, Global change biology.

[51]  E. Hornibrook,et al.  Trees are major conduits for methane egress from tropical forested wetlands. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[52]  Benjamin Poulter,et al.  Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP) , 2012 .

[53]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Mass fluxes and isofluxes of methane (CH4) at a New Hampshire fen measured by a continuous wave quantum cascade laser spectrometer , 2012 .

[54]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Plant-mediated CH 4 transport and contribution of photosynthates to methanogenesis at a boreal mire: a 14 C pulse-labeling study , 2011 .

[55]  W. J. Riley,et al.  Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM , 2011 .

[56]  V. Catoire,et al.  In situ quantification of CH4 bubbling events from a peat soil using a new infrared laser spectrometer , 2011 .

[57]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global Convergence in the Temperature Sensitivity of Respiration at Ecosystem Level , 2010, Science.

[58]  A. Arneth,et al.  Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation , 2010 .

[59]  R. Conrad,et al.  The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. , 2009, Environmental microbiology reports.

[60]  T. Miyazaki,et al.  Episodic release of methane bubbles from peatland during spring thaw. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[61]  T. Miyazaki,et al.  Falling atmospheric pressure as a trigger for methane ebullition from peatland , 2007 .

[62]  T. Vesala,et al.  On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm , 2005 .

[63]  Masaru Mizoguchi,et al.  Ebullition of methane from peat with falling atmospheric pressure , 2005 .

[64]  E. Pfeiffer,et al.  Effect of microrelief and vegetation on methane emission from wet polygonal tundra, Lena Delta, Northern Siberia , 2004 .

[65]  Jin Chen,et al.  A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter , 2004 .

[66]  Donald I. Siegel,et al.  Surface deformations as indicators of deep ebullition fluxes in a large northern peatland , 2004 .

[67]  R. Rame Plant-mediated methane emission from an Indian mangrove , 2004 .

[68]  Keith Beven,et al.  The Predictive Uncertainty of Land Surface Fluxes in Response to Increasing Ambient Carbon Dioxide , 2001 .

[69]  Y. Iba EXTENDED ENSEMBLE MONTE CARLO , 2000, cond-mat/0012323.

[70]  J. Chanton,et al.  Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic evidence for transport and transformation of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and CH4 in a northern Minnesota peatland , 2000 .

[71]  Martin Heimann,et al.  A process‐based, climate‐sensitive model to derive methane emissions from natural wetlands: Application to five wetland sites, sensitivity to model parameters, and climate , 2000 .

[72]  K. Butterbach‐Bahl,et al.  Impact of gas transport through rice cultivars on methane emission from rice paddy fields , 1997 .

[73]  J. E. Lawson,et al.  METHANE EFFLUX FROM EMERGENT VEGETATION IN PEATLANDS , 1996 .

[74]  J. Chanton,et al.  Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands , 1993, Nature.

[75]  Tim R. Moore,et al.  Methane flux: Water table relations in northern wetlands , 1993 .

[76]  Leslie A. Morrissey,et al.  Methane emissions from Alaska Arctic tundra: An assessment of local spatial variability , 1992 .