SISIS ABSTRACT This paper addresses the seemingly implausible project of establishing a

the design and evolution of two software packages we shift the debate from understanding how technologies are made to work within particular settings to how they are built to work across a diverse range of organizational contexts. Our question is 'How do software packages achieve the mobility that allows them to bridge the heterogeneity within organizations and between organizations in different sectors and cultures?' We describe a set of revealed strategies through which suppliers produce software that embodies characteristics common across many users; what we term generification work. One aspect of this process of generification is the configuring of users within 'managed communities', but it also includes 'smoothing' the contents of the package and, at times, reverting to 'social authority'. Our argument is that generic systems do exist but that they are brought into being through an intricately managed process, involving the broader extension of a particularized software application and, at the same time, the management of the user community attached to that solution.

[1]  J. Ravetz.  Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .

[2]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Mismatch and Tension: Standard Packages and Non-standard Users' , 1993 .

[3]  H. Scarbrough,et al.  Expertise and Innovation , 1995 .

[4]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[5]  K. K. Cetina.  Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[6]  R. Robertson.  Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture , 1992 .

[7]  Harold Salzman,et al.  Software by Design: Shaping Technology and The Workplace , 1994 .

[8]  Rob Procter,et al.  Fitting Standard Software Packages to Non-standard Organizations: The ‘Biography’ of an Enterprise-wide System , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[9]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[10]  Steven G. Epstein,et al.  Institutionalizing the new politics of difference in U.S. biomedical research: Thinking across the science/state/society divides , 2006 .

[11]  M. H. Small,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in small and midsize manufacturing firms , 2003 .

[12]  M. Berg,et al.  Standardization in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols , 1997 .

[13]  Alberto Cambrosio,et al.  Exquisite Specificity: The Monoclonal Antibody Revolution , 1995 .

[14]  Kristin Braa,et al.  Hunting for the Treasure at the End of the Rainbow: Standardizing corporate IT Infrastructure , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  G. Walsham.  Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[16]  Marianne de Laet,et al.  The Zimbabwe Bush Pump , 2000 .

[17]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Technologies as cultural artefacts , 1996 .

[18]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Les Gasser,et al.  The integration of computing and routine work , 1986, TOIS.

[20]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[21]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[22]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .

[23]  James Cornford,et al.  Computer Systems Development: History, organization and implementation , 1990 .

[24]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[25]  Joseph O'connell,et al.  Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars , 1993 .

[26]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence , 1999 .

[27]  James Stewart,et al.  Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies , 2005 .

[28]  Marc Berg,et al.  Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-support Techniques and Medical Practices , 2022 .

[29]  Steven Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software: implications of the differences from custom approaches to software development , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Margaret Tierney,et al.  The Commodification of Industry Applications Software , 1992 .

[31]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Working relations of technology production and use , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[32]  A. Whitehead.  Science and the Modern World , 1926 .

[33]  Paul Quintas,et al.  Programmed Innovation? Trajectories of Change in Software Development , 1994 .

[34]  Philippe Rouchy,et al.  Co-Realisation: Towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  T. Gieryn.  Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line , 1999 .

[36]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  A market-based perspective on information systems development , 2001, CACM.

[37]  M. Hales,et al.  Where Are Designers? Styles of Design Practice, Objects of Design and Views of Users in CSCW , 1994 .

[38]  Frederick Errington Deborah Gewertz.  On the Generification of Culture: From Blow Fish to Melanesian , 2001 .

[39]  S. Shapin.  Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science , 1998 .

[40]  Steven Shapin,et al.  The Place of Knowledge A Methodological Survey , 1991, Science in Context.

[41]  H. Mackay,et al.  Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation , 1992 .

[42]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Image Dissection in Natural Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .